Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2001, Vol. 44, No. 23 3819
alkyl-N-(3-hydroxy)benzyl]aminoalkoxy derivative (0.001 mol),
the selected alkyl isocyanate (0.001 mol), and 10 mg of NaH
in dry toluene was stirred at room temperature for 24 h,
quenched with water, and then extracted with dichloromethane.
The organic layer was washed with water, dried, and evapo-
rated to dryness. The residue was purified by crystallization
or by flash chromatography.
was analyzed in triplicate. The percent inhibition of the
enzyme activity due to the presence of increasing test com-
pound concentration was calculated by the following expres-
sion: 100 - (vi/v0 × 100), where vi is the rate calculated in
the presence of inhibitor and v0 is the enzyme activity.
Inhibition curves were obtained for each compound by plotting
the percent inhibition versus the logarithm of inhibitor
concentration in the assay solution. The linear regression
parameters were determined for each curve and the IC50
extrapolated.
1H NMR for Com p ou n d s 12a -12j, 13, 14, 15a -d . 12a :
δ (CDCl3) 1.45 (m, 6H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 2.1 (s, 3H), 2.3 (t, 2H),
2.8 (d, 3H), 3.4 (s, 2H), 4.0 (t, 2H), 4.85 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-
8.3 (m, 11H, Ar). 12b: δ (CDCl3) 1.5 (m, 8H), 1.85 (m, 2H), 2.2
(s, 3H), 2.35 (t, 2H), 2.8 d, 3H), 3.5 (s, 2H), 4.1 (t, 2H), 4.9
(broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-8.35 (m, 11H, Ar). 12c: δ (CDCl3) 1.45
(m, 10H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 2.1 (s, 3H), 2.3 (t, 2H), 2.8 (d, 3H), 3.4
(s, 2H), 4.0 (t, 2H), 4.85 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-8.3 (m, 11H,
Ar). 12d : δ (CDCl3) 1.45 (m, 12H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 2.1 (s, 3H),
2.3 (t, 2H), 2.8 (d, 3H), 3.4 (s, 2H), 4.0 (t, 2H), 4.85 (broad, 1H,
NH), 6.8-8.3 (m, 11H, Ar). 12e: δ (CDCl3) 1.45 (m, 14H), 1.8
(m, 2H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 2.35 (t, 2H), 2.8 (d, 3H), 3.4 (s, 2H), 4.1
(t, 2H), 4.95 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-8.4 (m, 11H, Ar). 12f: δ
(DMSO-d6) 2.25 (t, 2H), 2.65 (d, 3H), 2.7 (s, 3H), 3.2 (t, 2H),
4.1-4.5 (m, 4H), 7.0-7.8 (m, 13H, Ar). 12g: δ (DMSO-d6) 2.15
(t, 2H), 2.65 (d, 3H), 2.7 (s, 3H), 3.2 (t, 2H), 3.85 (s, 2H), 4.0 (t,
2H), 4.3 (m, 2H), 6.8-7.8 (m, 13H, Ar). 12h : δ (DMSO-d6) 2.25
(t, 2H), 2.65 (d, 3H), 2.75 (s, 3H), 3.2 (t, 2H), 4.1-4.5 (m, 4H),
7.1-7.9 (m, 11H, Ar). 12i: δ (DMSO-d6) 2.25 (t, 2H), 2.65 (d,
3H), 2.7 (s, 3H), 3.2 (t, 2H), 4.0 (t, 2H), 4.3 (m, 2H), 6.9-7.8
(m, 9H, Ar). 12j: δ (CDCl3) 2.0 (m, 2H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.6 (t,
2H), 2.87 (d, 3H), 3.55 (s, 2H), 4.08 (t, 2H), 6.95-7.58 (m, 13H,
Ar). 13: δ (DMSO-d6) 2.65 (s, 3H), 2.75 (d, 3H), 4.1 (s, 2H),
4.3 (s, 2H), 5.2 (s, 2H), 7.1-8.2 (m, 11H, Ar). 14: δ (CDCl3)
2.24-2.43 (m, 2H), 2.66 (d, 3H), 3.29-3.48 (m, 4H), 3.71-3.83
(m, 2H), 4.25-4.68 (m, 4H), 7.04-8.12 (m, 10H, Ar), 10.80
(broad, 1H, NH).15a : δ (CDCl3) 1.2-1.6 (m, 8H), 2.05 (t, 2H),
2.3 (m, 5H), 2.45 (m, 4H), 2.6 (t, 2H), 3.25 (m, 2H), 3.55 (s,
2H), 3.75 (m, 4H), 4.2 (t, 2H), 5.05 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-8.4
(m, 11H, Ar). 15b: δ (CDCl3) 1.3-1.6 (m, 10H), 2.05 (t, 2H),
2.3 (m, 5H), 2.45 (m, 4H), 2.6 (t, 2H), 3.25 (m, 2H), 3.55 (s,
2H), 3.75 (m, 4H), 4.2 (t, 2H), 5.0 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.9-8.4
(m, 11H, Ar). 15c: δ (CDCl3) 1.2-1.6 (m, 12H), 2.05 (t, 2H),
2.3 (m, 5H), 2.45 (m, 4H), 2.55 (t, 2H), 3.25 (m, 2H), 3.5 (s,
2H), 3.7 (m, 4H), 4.2 (t, 2H), 5.0 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-8.4 (m,
11H, Ar). 15d : δ (CDCl3) 1.2-1.6 (m, 14H), 2.05 (t, 2H), 2.3
(m, 5H), 2.45 (m, 4H), 2.55 (t, 2H), 3.25 (m, 2H), 3.5 (s, 2H),
3.7 (m, 4H), 4.2 (t, 2H), 5.0 (broad, 1H, NH), 6.8-8.4 (m, 11H,
Ar).
In h ibition of ACh E a n d Bu Ch E. The method of Ellman12
was followed. ATCh iodide solution (0.037 M) was prepared
in water. 5,5′-Dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, Ellman’s
reagent) (0.01 M) was dissolved in pH 7.0 phosphate buffer,
and 0.15% (w/v) NaHCO3 was added. AChE solution was
prepared dissolving 20 units in 5 mL of 0.2% aqueous gelatin
by sonication at 35 °C. A dilution 1:1 with water was performed
before use, to obtain the enzyme activity comprised between
0.13 and 0.100 AU/min. Stock solutions of the test compounds
(0.5-1 mM) were prepared in ethanol as well as the physos-
tigmine reference stock solution. The assay solutions were
prepared by diluting the stock solutions in water. Five different
concentrations of each compound were used in order to obtain
inhibition of AChE activity comprised between 20 and 80%.
The assay solution consisted of a 0.1 M phosphate buffer
pH 8.0, with the addition of 340 µM DTNB, 0.035 unit/mL
AChE derived from human erythrocytes (Sigma Chemical),
and 550 µM ATCh iodide. The final assay volume was 1 mL.
Test compounds were added to the assay solution and prein-
cubated with the enzyme for 20 min, the addition of substrate
following.
Inhibition of BuChE was measured as described above,
substituting 0.035 unit/mL of BuChE from human serum and
550 µM butyrylthiocholine (BuTCh) for enzyme and substrate,
respectively.
Kinetic characterization of carbamoylation events. The
stopped time assay was performed, in which AChE and
inhibitors at five concentrations comprised in the range 0.34-
1.35 nM (12a ), 0.81-57 nM (15b), and 10-200 nM (physos-
tigmine as reference compound) were mixed in the assay buffer
at pH 8.0. After few minutes incubation at 37 °C, the
determination of residual activity of the AChE-catalyzed
hydrolysis of ATCh was followed spectrophotometrically at 412
nm. A parallel control (i.e., no inhibitors in the mixture)
allowed to adjust activities measured at various time.
The data were fitted to eq 1, and kobs values were calculated
accordingly. KC and k3 values were calculated from the plots
of kobs against [I] (eq 2).
Deca r ba m oyla tion Kin etics. Stock solutions in replicates
were prepared as following: the free enzyme (1.0 units in 2
mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 8.0), the same amount of
enzyme plus 12a (1.39 × 10-8 M) and 15b (2.6 × 10-7 M).
The solutions were gently stirred and incubated at 37 °C
for 20 min. They were then loaded into 12.000 MW cutoff
dialysis bags and dialyzed at 4 °C against 2 L of 0.1 M
phosphate buffer pH 8.0. Dialysis was interrupted after 6-12-
18-24-48-96 h. The solutions were diluted five times with
the same buffer and kept at 20-22 °C under magnetic stirring.
Aliquots of 0.95 mL of each solution were sampled, and the
enzyme activity was spectrophotometrically tested after ad-
dition of 0.034 mL of DTNB and 0.016 mL of ATCh as above-
described. Plots of enzyme activities for each compound
expressed as a percentage of the dialyzed free enzyme activity
against the time of dialysis were calculated for each inhibitors.
The obtained curves were fitted to one phase exponential
growth or two phase exponential growth with the Prism 3.0
program and the experimental rate constants k5 derived. Half
time is 0.69/k5.
Ack n ow led gm en t. Investigation supported by Uni-
versity of Bologna (funds for selected research topics)
and by MURST. M.R. thanks Corwin Hansch for the
access to the C-QSAR program.
Refer en ces
(1) Selkoe, D. J . Translating Cell Biology into Therapeutic Advances
in Alzheimer’s Disease. Nature 1999, 399, A23-A31.
(2) Siddiqui, M. F.; Levey, A.-I. Cholinergic Therapies in Alzheimer’s
Disease. Drugs Fut. 1999, 24, 417-424.
(3) Bartus, R. T.; Dean, L. D. III; Beer, B.; Lippa, A. S. The
Cholinergic Hypothesis of Geriatric Memory Dysfunction. Sci-
ence 1982, 217, 408-417.
(4) Reiner, E.; Radic´, Z. Mechanism of Action of Cholinesterase
Inhibitors. In Cholinesterases and Cholinesterase Inhibitors;
Giacobini, E., Ed.; Martin Dunitz Ltd: London, UK, 2000; pp
103-119.
(5) (a) Valenti, P.; Rampa, A.; Bisi, A.; Fabbri, G.; Andrisano, V.;
Cavrini, V. Cholinergic Agents. Synthesis and Acetylcholin-
esterase Inhibitory Activity of Some ω-[N-Methyl-N-(3-alkyl-
carbamoyloxyphenyl)methyl]aminoalkoxyxanthen-9-ones. Med.
Chem. Res. 1995, 5, 255-264. (b) Rampa, A.; Bisi, A.; Valenti,
P.; Recanatini, M.; Cavalli, A.; Andrisano, V.; Cavrini, V.; Fin,
L.; Buriani, A.; Giusti, P. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: Syn-
thesis and Structure-Activity Relationships of ω-[N-methyl-N-
(3-alkylcarbamoyloxyphenyl)methyl]aminoalkoxyheteroaryl de-
rivatives. J . Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3976-3986.
Initial rate assays were performed at 37 °C with a J asco
Uvidec-610 double beam spectrophotometer: the rate of ab-
sorbance increase at 412 nm was followed for 5 min. Assays
were performed with a blank containing all components except
AChE, to account for nonenzymatic reaction. The reaction
rates were compared, and the percent inhibition due to the
presence of test compounds was calculated. Each concentration