A.A. Kalinin et al.
Dyes and Pigments 184 (2021) 108801
2.2.2.3. 2-(3-Сyano-5-(4-cyclohexylphenyl)-4-((E)-2-(6-((E)-4-(dibuty-
lamino)styryl)-3-phenylquinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-5-methylfuran-2(5H)-yli-
dene)malononitrile (DBA-VQPhV-TCFPhCy). Yield 85 mg (49%). Rf
where z-axis coincides with the charge transfer direction along the
molecule. Average linear polarizability αav is calculated as
=
ꢀ
)
1
0.37 (hexane/ethyl acetate 3:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.07–7.97
α
(av) = αxx
+
αyy
+
αzz
,
3
–
(m, 3H, Н-7.8 quinoxaline, 1H of –CH CHꢀ TCF), 7.93 (s, 1H, Н-5
–
quinoxaline), 7.57 (dd, J = 7.3, 7.3 Hz, 1H, p-Ph), 7.50–7.27 (m, 8H, o,
and βtot as
–
–
–
m-Ph, 3,5-H aniline, 1H of –CH CHꢀ DBA, 1H of –CH CHꢀ TCF), 7.14
–
√̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
∑
1
3
βtot
=
β2x + β2y + β2z ; βi = βiii
+
(βikk + βkik + βkki), i = x, y, z.
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 3,5-H p-CyPh), 7.03 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H,
–
i=∕k
–CH CHꢀ DBA), 6.99 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6-H p-CyPh), 6.66 (d, J =
–
8.7 Hz, 2H, 2,6-H aniline), 3.33 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H, NСН ), 3.40 (t, J =
2
The calculations were performed by Jaguar program package [68,
7.6 Hz, 4H, NСН ), 2.55–2.46 (m, 1H, Cy), 2.03 (s, 3H, Me), 1.92–1.81
2
69].
(m, 4H, Cy), 1.80–1.73 (m, 1H, Cy), 1.67–1.56 (m, 4H, NCH2CH2),
1.48–1.35 (m, 8H, N(CH2)2CH2, 4H of Cy), 1.32–1.20 (m, 1H, Cy), 0.98
(t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6Н, СН ). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 175.1, 172.7,
2.4. Atomistic modeling
3
155.8, 150.7, 148.9, 143.2, 143.0, 142.9, 142.8, 141.5, 137.2, 133.8,
132.2, 129.8, 129.4, 129.3, 128.8, 128.7, 128.0, 125.7, 124.8, 123.4,
121.7, 120.1, 111.7, 111.3, 110.7, 109.7, 103.2, 99.3, 58.9, 50.8, 44.2,
34.2, 34.1, 29.4, 26.7, 26.0, 24.1, 20.3, 14.0. IR (νmax, cmꢀ 1, KBr): 3462
To estimate the isolating ability of substituents in acceptor fragment
of the chromophores, molecular modeling of composite materials with
PMMA as polymer matrix and chromophores-guests was carried out. The
chromophore content in considered composite polymer materials was
20, 25 and 30 wt%. Composite polymer materials were packed in the
amorphous cell under compressive protocol (NPT ensemble) (Fig. S1) in
the course of multistage simulation to get density close to that of real
polymer. Polymer matrix was modeled by 10 chains each containing 60
monomer units. Such oligomer size provides sufficient flexibility of
chains, it contains 10 Kuhn segments [70] Polymer chains and chro-
mophores in such a cell experience steric hindrances due to environ-
ment. Chromophore number in a cell was tuned according the
chromophore molecular weight and the desired weight content in
composite material; weight content is indicated in round parentheses
after composite system notation. Molecular modeling was performed
with Desmond program [71] using OPLS3e force field [72].
– –
– –
–
–
(CH), 2927 (CH), 2229 (CN), 1582 (C C, C N), 1512 (C C). MALDI-
TOF: 789 [M+H]+.
2.2.3. 2-(3-Cyano-5-(4-cyclohexylphenyl)-4-((E)-2-(6-((E)-4-
(dibutylamino)styryl)-3-oxo-4-propyl-3,4-dihydroquinoxalin-2-yl)vinyl)-5-
methylfuran-2(5H)-ylidene)malononitrile (DBA-VQonV-TCFPhCy
)
A mixture of aldehyde 7 (60 mg, 0.13 mmol), Me-TCFPhCy (8c) (46
mg, 0.13 mmol) and anhydrous ethanol (1 mL, A and B) or anhydrous
ethanol (2.2 mL) and methylene chloride (0.8 mL, C) was stirred for 6 h
(A), 40 h (B) and 144 h (C) at 70 ◦С (A), 50 ◦С (B) and rt (C), respec-
tively, then cooled to rt (A and B). After removal of the solvent by rotary
evaporation, the residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatog-
raphy (eluent: methylene chloride/ethyl acetate = 250:1) to give a
product as black powder. Yield 34 mg (33%, A), 58 mg (56%, B), 36 mg
(35%, C). Rf = 0.32 (hexane/ethyl acetate 2.5:1). 1H NMR (600 MHz,
2.5. Film fabrication, poling and NLO measurements
–
CDCl ): δ 7.99 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H, –CH CH-TCF), 7.78 (d, J = 8.6 Hz,
–
3
–
–
1H, H-8 quinoxaline), 7.67 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H, –CH CH-TCF), 7.56 (d,
The guest-host polymer materials were prepared with PMMA as
J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, H-7 quinoxaline), 7.43 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 3,5-H aniline),
polymer matrix (Tg = 103 ◦C) and chromophores under study as guests.
7.29 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, C6H4Cy), 7.26 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, C6H4Cy), 7.24
Thin polymer films were cast onto glass substrates (cover glasses 100 μm
–
(d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, –CH CH-An), 7.15 (s, 1H, H-5 quinoxaline), 6.94
–
thick) from a 5–7% solution of the polymer in cyclohexanone via spin-
coating at 5000 rpm for 90 s. After casting, the samples were kept in a
vacuum drying oven at room temperature for 10–16 h to remove the
solvent residue. Films were poled at the corona-triode setup in the
corona discharge field, voltage 6.5 kV, poling time ~20 min, the dis-
tance from the tungsten needle electrode to the surface of the film being
1 cm; the field was applied to the films heated to 108–118 ◦C. Second
harmonic generation (SHG) was performed by the femtosecond ampli-
fied laser system which allowed measuring the SHG intensity emitted by
the sample without any micro-objective or another focusing system. The
principal scheme of the experimental setup is presented in the Supple-
mentary information and in [73]. The laser system produced pulses with
the following parameters: the wavelength is 1028 nm, the pulse repe-
–
(d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, –CH CH-An), 6.65 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6-H ani-
–
line), 4.26–4.19 (m, 1H, N–CH2), 4.19–4.12 (m, 1H, N–CH2), 3.33 (t, J
= 7.4 Hz, 4H, N–CH2), 2.60–2.49 (m, 1H, Cy), 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3),
1.90–1.79 (m, 6H, 4H of Cy, N(CO)CH2CH2), 1.78–1.72 (m, 1H, Cy),
1.67–1.64 (m, 4H, N–CH2CH2), 1.44–1.34 (m, 8H, N-(CH2)2CH2, 4H of
Cy), 1.32–1.23 (m, 1H, Cy), 1.09 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H, CH3), 0.98 (t, J = 7.4
Hz, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 175.1, 172.7, 154.7, 150.7,
149.1, 146.36, 143.7, 140.6, 134.0, 133.9, 133.0, 132.6, 131.6, 128.9,
128.0, 125.9, 122.9, 122.0, 121.5, 121.1, 111.8, 111.4, 110.9, 110.7,
110.0, 103.2, 99.8, 58.6, 50.8, 44.2, 44.1, 34.2, 34.1, 29.5, 26.7, 26.0,
24.4, 20.6, 20.3, 14.0, 11.4. IR (νmax, cmꢀ 1, KBr): 3068 (C–H), 3030
–
–
N), 1657
–
+
–
(C–H), 2957 (C––H), 2–928 (C–H), 2855 (C–H), 2229 (C
(C O), 1582 (C N, C C). MALDI-TOF: 771 [M+H] .
– – –
tition rate is 3 kHz, pulse duration is 200 fs, a pulse energy is 164 μJ, and
mean power of the laser beam is 492 mW. The beam diameter of 3 mm
2.3. DFT calculations
resulted in the peak pulse intensity of about 11.6 GW/cm2. SHG in-
tensity was measured by using a z-cut α-quartz crystal as a source of a
Structure and NLO characteristics of chromophores under study were
calculated in the framework of Density Functional Theory (DFT).
Chromophores geometrical parameters were optimized in gas phase at
reference signal. We followed [74] to obtain the NLO coefficient of the
sample d33,s
:
√̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
/
B3LYP/6-31G(d) level and electric characteristics (dipole moments, μ,
d33,s
d11,q
l
ls
=
Is Iq c,q F,
components of linear polarizability tensor, αij
, and first hyper-
polarizability tensor, βijk) were calculated at the M06-2X/aug-cc-pVDZ
level; the use of M06-2X density functional [61,62] and Dunning basis
sets [63,64] are recognized as an adequate choice for this purpose
[65–67]; further on the computational level for electric characteristics
calculations is denoted as B3LYP/6-31G(d)//M06-2X/aug-cc-pVDZ.
These chromophores are systems with intramolecular charge transfer,
where d11,q is known quartz nonlinear coefficient (0.45 pm/V), Is and Iq
are SHG intensities produced by the sample and the quartz, respectively,
and measured in the same configuration, lc,q is quartz coherence length
related to 1028 nm (assumed as 13 μm), ls is sample thickness (of 0.3 μm
mean value), F is correction factor (1.2 when lc,q≫ls). It was assumed in
analyzing experimental data that d33/d13 ≈ 3.
the dominating component of first hyperpolarizability tensor is βzzz
,
3