Notes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 23, 2001 7881
cautiously hydrolyzed with an aqueous 10% ammonium chloride
solution. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous layer
extracted twice with diethyl ether. The combined organic phases
were dried, the solvent removed under vacuum, and the residue
chromatographed to give the title compound (9.5 g, 75%): oil;
IR νmax (neat, cm-1) 3434 (OH); MS m/z 164 (M+ - 90, 100), 91
(36), 57 (50); 1H NMR (200 MHz) δ 1.27 (9 H, s, t-Bu), 2.04 (1 H,
bs, OH), 2.86 (2 H, d, J ) 6.3 Hz, CH2), 5.38 (1 H, t, J ) 6.3 Hz,
Ch a r t 2
CH), 6.99-7.17 (7 H, m, Ar-H), 7.20 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 7.4 Hz, J 2
)
1.9 Hz, Ar-H), 7.54 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 7.4 Hz, J 2 ) 1.9 Hz, Ar-H);
13C NMR (50 MHz) δ 32.06, 35.26 (q), 45.45 (CH2), 71.07 (CH),
125.43, 126.34, 127.25, 128.20, 128.33, 129.28, 138.86 (q), 142.95
(q), 146.10 (q) (2 aromatic CH overlapped). Anal. Calcd for
C18H22O: C, 84.99; H, 8.72. Found: C, 85.30; H, 8.70.
1-(2-ter t-Bu tylp h en yl)-2-p h en yleth a n on e (1). Following
the literature,24 concentrated sulfuric acid (2.4 mL) was cau-
tiously added, at 0 °C, to a solution of CrO3 (2.86 g, 29 mmol) in
water (20 mL). The resulting mixture was added dropwise to a
stirred solution of the above alcohol (5.6 g, 22 mmol) in acetone
(10 mL). The reaction course was monitored by TLC; after a few
hours, an approximately 1:1 ketone/alcohol ratio was obtained
that did not change by prolonging the reaction time. After 12 h,
the mixture was diluted with water and extracted with diethyl
ether. The organic phase was dried, the solvent removed under
vacuum, and the residue chromatographed to give, together with
some unreacted starting alcohol (45%), the title ketone (2.8 g,
50%): oil; IR νmax (neat, cm-1) 1703 (CO); MS m/z 252 (M+, 1),
237 (3), 161 (100), 91 (45); 1H NMR (200 MHz) δ 1.35 (9 H, s,
t-Bu), 4.14 (2 H, s, CH2), 7.11 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 7.1 Hz, J 2 ) 2.0 Hz,
Ar-H), 7.15 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 6.5 Hz, J 2 ) 1.2 Hz, Ar-H), 7.20-7.38
(6 H, m, Ar-H), 7.47 (1 H, bd, J ) 7.1 Hz, Ar-H); 13C NMR (50
MHz) δ 32.46, 36.60 (q), 51.88 (CH2), 125.84, 126.92, 127.60,
127.87, 129.09, 129.81, 130.46, 134.45 (q), 142.10 (q), 147.62 (q),
207.24 (q). Anal. Calcd for C18H20O: C, 85.67; H, 7.99. Found:
C, 85.82; H, 7.96.
Met h yla t ion of 1-(2-ter t-Bu t ylp h en yl)-2-p h en ylet h a -
n on e. According to the literature,25 in a three-necked round-
bottomed flask sodium hydride (60% dispersion in mineral oil,
0.64 g, 16 mmol) was suspended under stirring at 10 °C in
anhydrous DMF (20 mL) under nitrogen. Methyl iodide (2.8 g,
20 mmol) was added, followed by dropwise addition of a solution
of the above ketone (3.68 g, 15 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (10
mL). After 5 h, the mixture was carefully hydrolyzed with water
and extracted with diethyl ether. The organic phase was dried
and the solvent removed to give an oily residue that was purified
twice by column chromatography and finally by preparative TLC
to yield 1-(2-tert-butylphenyl)-2,2-dimethyl-2-phenylethanone 3
(1.03, 25%) [oil; IR νmax (neat, cm-1) 1690 (CO); MS m/z 280 (M+,
<1), 265 (3), 161 (100), 91 (44); 1H NMR (200 MHz) δ 1.42 (9 H,
s, t-Bu), 1.62 (6 H, s, CMe2), 6.43 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 7.7 Hz, J 2 ) 1.4
Hz, Ar-H), 6.86 (1 H, bt, J ) 7.5 Hz, Ar-H), 7.16-7.60 (7 H, m,
Ar-H); 13C NMR (50 MHz) δ 28.18, 33.07, 36.63 (q), 52.32 (q),
125.18, 126.68, 127.48, 128.50, 129.33, 129.53, 140.16 (q), 145.41
(q), 148.53 (q), 213.26 (q) (two aromatic CH overlapped). Anal.
Calcd for C20H24O: C, 85.67; H, 8.63. Found: C, 85.89; H, 8.59],
1-(2-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-2-phenylethanone 2 (0.66, 17%)
[oil; IR νmax (neat, cm-1) 1697 (CO); MS m/z 251 (M+ - 15, 3),
161 (100), 91 (55); 1H NMR (200 MHz) δ 1.32 (9 H, s, t-Bu), 1.62
(3 H, d, J ) 7.0 Hz, CHMe), 4.30 (1 H, q, J ) 7.0 Hz, CHMe),
6.62 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 7.8 Hz, J 2 ) 1.4 Hz, Ar-H), 6.96 (1 H, ddd, J 1
) J 2 ) 7.2 Hz, J 3 ) 1.0 Hz, Ar-H), 7.19-7.35 (6 H, m, Ar-H),
7.45 (1 H, dd, J 1 ) 8.2 Hz, J 2 ) 1.0 Hz, Ar-H); 13C NMR (50
MHz) δ 19.90, 32.71, 36.56 (q), 55.04, 125.43, 127.82, 128.01,
128.99, 129.37, 129.60, 140.99 (q), 141.74 (q), 147.73 (q), 210.74
(q) (two aromatic CH overlapped). Anal. Calcd for C19H22O: C,
85.67; H, 8.32. Found: C, 85.92; H, 8.30], and the starting ketone
(0.56 g, 15%). Some fractions of the first column contained minor
amounts of 1-(tert-butyl)-2-[1-methoxy-2-phenylethenyl]benzene
[1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 1.44 (9 H, s, t-Bu), 3.40 (3 H, s, MeO),
5.50 (1 H, s, CdCH), 7.10-7.40 (6 H, m, Ar-H), 7.49-7.59 (1 H,
m, Ar-H), 7.63-7.73 (2 H, m, Ar-H)] and 1-(tert-butyl)-2-[1-
methoxy-2-phenyl-1-propenyl]benzene [1H NMR (300 MHz) δ
1.44 (9 H, s, t-Bu), 1.73 (3 H, s, CdCMe), 3.19 (3 H, s, OMe),
two diastereoisomers happen to be accidentally coinci-
dent, we must conclude that only one of the two diaste-
reoisomers is appreciably populated. Actually an acci-
dental coincidence is not very plausible since, for instance,
the lines of the five quaternary carbons of 2 have a width
of only 2 or 3 Hz at -160 °C. Had two diastereoisomers
been present in comparable amount, it is unlikely that
not even one of these sharp lines would display the
expected splitting.
It has also to be considered that the poor solubility at
such low temperatures makes, in practice, invisible the
13C spectrum of a minor species having a population
lower than 10-15%. The MM calculations estimate that
diastereoisomer 2 RM is 0.4 kcal mol-1 more stable than
2 RP (Table 1), thus entailing a 85:15 ratio at -160 °C.
Likewise, ab initio calculations22 predict an energy dif-
ference of 0.55 kcal mol-1, which corresponds to a RM
population of 92% at that temperature. If we consider
the differences likely to come about between the situation
computed for the isolated molecule and the experimental
situation occurring in solution, it is quite plausible that
the actual population of the major diastereoisomer is
definitely larger than 90%. This would account for the
NMR detection of only one of the two diastereoisomers,
to which the RM structure should be therefore assigned.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es a n d Ma ter ia l. Mass spectra (MS)
were performed by electron impact with a beam energy of 70
eV: relative intensities are given in parentheses. Column
chromatography was carried out on silica gel (63-200, 60 Å) by
gradual elution with light petroleum (40-70 °C)/diethyl ether
mixtures (from 0 up to 100% diethyl ether). Preparative TLC
chromatography was performed on 1 mm thick aluminum oxide
plates. 2-tert-Butylbenzaldehyde was prepared according to a
known procedure.23
1-(2-ter t-Bu tylph en yl)-2-ph en yleth an ol. A solution of 2-tert-
butylbenzaldehyde (8.0 g, 50 mmol) in dry diethyl ether (25 mL)
was added dropwise to a stirred solution of benzylmagnesium
chloride, obtained by treatment of benzyl chloride (6.85 g, 50
mmol) with magnesium turnings (1.35 g, 50 mmol) in dry diethyl
ether (150 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 3 h and
(22) Calculations carried out at the RHF 6-31G* level using the
J aguar 3.5-42 version, as implemented in the computer package Titan,
Wavefunction Inc., Irvine, CA.
(23) Meyers, A. I.; Himmelsbach, R. J .; Reuman, M. J . Org. Chem.
1983, 48, 4053.
(24) Teitei, T. Aust. J . Chem. 1983, 33, 605.
(25) Leardini, R.; Lucarini, M.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L. J . Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 3726.