3570 J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2004, Vol. 47, No. 14
Zlotos et al.
(6) Christopoulos, A.; Kenakin, T. G-Protein-coupled receptor al-
losterism and complexing. Pharmacol. Rev. 2002, 54, 323-374.
(7) Christopoulos, A. Allosteric binding sites on cell-surface recep-
tors: novel targets for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discuss.
2002, 1, 198-210.
(8) Ellis, J .; Huyler, J .; Brann, M. R. Allosteric regulations of cloned
m1-m5 muscarinic receptor subtypes. Biochem. Pharmacol.
1991, 42, 1927.
(9) Tra¨nkle, C.; Mies-Klomfass, E.; Botero Cid, M. H.; Holzgrabe,
U.; Mohr, K. Identification of a [3H]ligand for the common
allosteric site of muscarinic acetylcholine M2 receptors. Mol.
Pharmacol. 1998, 54, 139-145.
(10) Ellis, J .; Seidenberg, M. Two allosteric modulators interact at a
common site on cardiac muscarinic receptors. Mol. Pharmacol.
1992, 42, 638-641.
binding data (from two to five independent experiments with
quadruplicated values) in the presence of allosteric modulator
were expressed in percent relative to the control binding in
the absence of modulator, which was set as 100%.
Molecu la r Mod elin g. Geom et r y Op t im iza t ion a n d
Align m en t. The three different ring skeletons of 6, 10, and
34
34 were selected as template structures for the alignment
procedure necessary for CoMSIA studies. As a first step, the
structures were aligned using SYBYL’s multifit procedure.50
For this alignment, the torsional angle between atoms C12-
C13-N-C17′ found in the AM1 calculations34 were con-
strained to their current value. Then the corresponding
quaternary nitrogen atoms and the centroids of the aromatic
rings C8-C13 and C8′-C13′ were aligned with spring con-
stants of 20 and 10, respectively. The resulting alignment was
very good. The remaining compounds of the data set were built
based on these template structures. For the latter step, the
backbone of the template structures was kept fixed, and only
the N-substituents were geometry optimized. For all optimiza-
tion steps, the Tripos force field with a Powell minimizer was
applied for 300 iterations. All other options were set to their
respective default values. Compounds with unsubstituted
nitrogen were ionized. After the alignment step, AM1 charges
were calculated for all structures (MOPAC keywords: 1SCF
AM1 MMOK).
3D-QSAR. CoMSIA fields were generated using SYBYL.50
The CoMSIA region was automatically defined and all avail-
able fields (steric, electrostatic, acceptor, donor, and hydro-
phobic) were calculated. Coefficient contour maps showing the
product of standard deviation and coefficient (“StdDev*Coeff”)
were used for interpretation purposes. To identify appropriate
contour levels, field value histograms for each feature were
analyzed, and levels that gave meaningful results were ap-
plied. It should be noted that contour maps showing steric and
electrostatic fields highlight those regions of the ligand which
enhance or decrease activity. In contrast to that, CoMSIA plots
for hydrogen bonding properties highlight areas where hydro-
gen-bond donor and hydrogen-bond acceptor features could be
located within a hypothetical receptor site.
(11) Tra¨nkle, C.; Mohr, K. Divergent modes of action among cationic
allosteric modulators of muscarinic M2 receptors. Mol. Pharma-
col. 1997, 51, 674-682.
(12) Buller, S.; Zlotos, D. P.; Mohr, K.; Ellis, J . Allosteric site on
muscarinic acetylcholine receptors:
a single amino acid in
transmembrane region 7 is critical to the subtype selectivities
of caracurine V derivatives and alkane-bisammonium ligands.
Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 61, 160-168.
(13) Tra¨nkle, C.; Kostenis, E.; Burgmer, U.; Mohr, K. Search for lead
structures to develop new allosteric modulators of muscarinic
receptors. J . Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 279, 926-933.
(14) Bejeuhr, G.; Blaschke, G.; Holzgrabe, U.; Mohr, K.; Su¨rig, U.;
Terfloth, G. Molecular modelling and synthesis of potent stabi-
lizers of antagonist binding to M2-cholinoceptors. J . Pharm.
Pharmacol. 1994, 46, 108-112.
(15) Botero Cid, M. H.; Holzgrabe, U.; Kostenis, E.; Mohr, K.; Tra¨nkle,
C. Search for the pharmacophore of bispyridinium-type allosteric
modulators of muscarinic receptors. J . Med. Chem. 1994, 37,
1439-1445.
(16) Botero Cid, H. M.; Tra¨nkle, C.; Baumann, K.; Pick, R.; Mies-
Klomfass, E.; Kostenis E.; Mohr, K.; Holzgrabe, U. Structure-
activity relationships in a series of bisquaternary phthalimidine
derivatives modulating the muscarinic M2-receptor allosterically.
J . Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2155-2164.
(17) Raasch, A.; Scharfenstein, O.; Tra¨nkle, C.; Holzgrabe, U.; Mohr,
K. Elevation of ligand binding to muscarinic M2 acetylcholine
receptors by bis(ammonio)alkane-type allosteric modulators. J .
Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 3809-3812.
(18) Muth, M.; Bender, W.; Scharfenstein, O.; Holzgrabe, U.; Balat-
kova, E.; Tra¨nkle, C.; Mohr, K. Systematic development of high
affinity bis(ammonio)alkane-type allosteric enhancers of mus-
carinic ligand binding. J . Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1031-1040.
(19) Nassif-Makki, T.; Tra¨nkle, C.; Zlotos, D.; Bejeuhr, G.; Cambareri,
A.; Pfletschinger, C.; Kostenis, E.; Mohr, K.; Holzgrabe, U.
Bisquaternary ligands of the common allosteric site of M2
acetylcholine receptors: optimization of the distances between
the pharmacophoric elements. J . Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 849-
858.
(20) Gharagozloo, P.; Lazareno, S.; Popham, A.; Birdsall, N. J . M.
Allosteric interactions of quaternary strychnine and brucine
derivatives with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J . Med.
Chem. 1999, 42, 438-445.
(21) Urbansky´, M.; Prosˇka, J .; Ricˇny, J .; Drasˇar, P. Truxillic acid
derivatives, neuromuscular blocking agents with very high
affinity for the allosteric binding site of muscarinic acetylcholine
receptors. Collect. Czech, Chem. Commun. 1999, 64, 1980-1992.
(22) Lysikova´, M.; Fuksova´, K.; Elbert, T.; J akubik, J .; Tucˇek, S.
Subtype-selective inhibition of [methyl-3H]-N-methylscopola-
mine binding to muscarinic receptors by alpha-truxillic acid
esters. Br. J . Pharmacol. 1999, 127, 1240-1246.
(23) Urbansky´, M.; Prosˇka, J .; Drasˇar, P. On steroids. CDII. Fused
thiazoloandrostanes and their quaternary salts, synthesis and
cooperative ligand binding to muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.
Collect. Czech, Chem. Commun. 1999, 64, 1457-1470.
(24) Gharagozloo, P.; Lazareno, S.; Miyauchi, M.; Popham, A.;
Birdsall, N. J . M. Substituted pentacyclic carbazoles as novel
muscarinic allosteric agents: synthesis and structure-affinity
and cooperativity relationships. J . Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1259-
1274.
Only the steric, electrostatic, and hydrogen-bond acceptor
CoMSIA field were applied in this study since preliminary
knowledge gained from the SAR study motivated their use (see
Results and Discussion). The first two fields were thought to
be useful in identifying the patterns of the N-substitution,
whereas the hydrogen-bond acceptor field was thought to be
useful for identifying the different skeletons (open and closed
ring systems).
Ack n ow led gm en t. Thanks are due to the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (MO 821/1) and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie, Deutschland, for financial sup-
port, as well as to Mechthild Kepe, Institute of Phar-
macy, University of Bonn, for her skillful technical
assistance.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: IR and 1H and 13C
NMR data of all compounds and a 2D-QSAR model. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
Refer en ces
(1) Stockton, J . M.; Birdsall, N. J . M.; Burgen, A. S. V.; Hulme, E.
C. Modification of the binding properties of the muscarinic
receptors by gallamine. Mol. Pharmacol. 1983, 23, 551-557.
(2) Lee, N. H.; El-Fakahany, E. E. Allosteric antagonists of the
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991, 42,
199-205.
(25) Zlotos, D. P.; Buller, S.; Holzgrabe, U.; Mohr, K. Bisquaternary
dimers of strychnine and brucine. A new class of potent enhanc-
ers of antagonist binding to muscarinic M2 receptors. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 2627-2634.
(26) Holzgrabe, U.; Wagener, M.; Gasteiger, J . Comparison of struc-
turally different allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors
by self-organizing neural networks. J . Mol. Graphics 1996, 14,
185-193.
(27) Holzgrabe, U.; Hopfinger, A. J . Conformational analysis, mo-
lecular shape comparison, and pharmacophore identification of
different allosteric modulators of muscarinic receptors. J . Chem.
Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1018-1024.
(3) Ellis, J . Allosteric binding site on muscarinic receptors. Drug
Dev. Res. 1997, 40, 193-204.
(4) Christopoulos, A.; Lanzafame, A.; Mitchelson, F. Allosteric
interactions at muscarinic cholinoceptors. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol.
Phys. 1998, 25, 185-194.
(5) Holzgrabe, U.; Mohr, K. Allosteric modulation of antagonist
binding to muscarinic receptors. Drugs Discovery Today 1998,
3, 214-222.