currently studying an asymmetric version of this reaction by
adding chiral zinc ligands to the reaction mixture.
Notes and references
† Typical experimental procedure: to a suspension of zirconocene hydro-
chloride (1.2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) under an N2 atmosphere at 20 °C was
added hex-1-yne (1.8 mmol) using standard Schlenk procedures. The
reaction was stirred at 20 °C until a homogeneous solution was formed. All
volatiles were then removed under reduced pressure at 20 °C, to give a
yellow vinylchlorozirconocene reagent. To the resultant solid was added
CH2Cl2 (2 mL) and the mixture was cooled to 265 °C. Diethylzinc (1.2
mmol, as a 1.1 M solution in toluene), was added dropwise (over 10 min) at
265 °C and allowed to stir for 15 min at 265 °C. The vessel was then
immersed in an ice bath and a solution of (N-benzylidene)benzylamine N-
oxide (1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2 mL) was added dropwise. After 6 h stirring at
0 °C, the reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution (2 mL),
and extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic extracts were
washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and filtered through a pad of silica.
Removal of the solvents under reduced pressure and purification by
chromatography (silica, cyclohexane–ethyl acetate 90+10) yielded the pure
adduct 3.
Scheme 2 Rearrangement of N-allylhydroxylamines 3.
phenylacetylene (entry q) all yielded substoichiometric
amounts of vinylzinc reagent, presumably due to a less efficient
hydrozirconation step. In these runs, the conversions of nitrones
2 were incomplete, and the expected products 3 were contami-
nated with N-propargylhydroxylamines,‡ derived from the
addition of the alkyne 1 onto the nitrone 2.§
‡ The IUPAC name for propargyl is prop-2-ynyl.
§ We found that a mixture of alkyne 1, nitrone 2 and diethylzinc in
CH2Cl2 or toluene at rt leads quantitatively to N-propargylhydroxylamine
adducts, and we are currently studying this reaction. A similar addition of
species generated from the reaction of dialkylzinc with terminal alkynes
onto aromatic aldehydes has been described previously.14
All the vinyl adducts freshly obtained from this procedure
were the expected (E)-N-allylhydroxylamines 3. Surprisingly
however, we observed that on standing (at room temperature),
some of the samples (neat or in CDCl3 solutions) isomerized
slowly, with allylic transposition, to yield (E)-O-allylhydrox-
ylamines 4 (Scheme 2). This process occurs particularly readily
for N-arylhydroxylamines. In these cases, the rearrangement
was complete within 24 h at 20 °C and consequently, the
rearranged adducts were isolated after completion of this step
(entries e, f, m, o). This rearrangement also occurred in the case
of N-tert-butylhydroxylamine 3g. The structure of 4o was
confirmed by its reduction to the (E)-allylic alcohol 5 (Zn,
AcOH–MeOH 1+9, 40 °C, 2 h, quant.).
To our knowledge, this rearrangement has not been pre-
viously described, although it can be related with several
observations, involving allylic N–O bonds, including the
Meisenheimer rearrangement of tertiary amine N-oxides.12
We observed qualitatively that the rate of this rearrangement
depends strongly on the nitrogen atom substitution: Aryl > t-Bu
> > Bn. Several observations hint at a radical mechanism. First,
the reaction seems to be initiated by air: in an early experiment,
we observed a 50+50 mixture of 3o and 4o 2 h after working-up
the reaction. We repeated the experiment, using for the
hydrolytic work-up freshly distilled solvents and freshly boiled
water phases, and handling the crude materials with simple
anaerobic precautions: the amount of isomer 4o was then
reduced to less than 3% (NMR) of the crude material.
Thereafter, exposure to air induced the rearrangement. EPR of
the crude materials during isomerization showed a strong
signal, with a fine structure consistent with the aminoxyl radical
derived from 3. Obviously, this radical could be the active
species, undergoing a Meisenheimer [2,3] rearrangement. We
are currently investigating the mechanism, scope, and limita-
tions of this new reaction.
1 C. Dagoneau, A. Tomassini, J. N. Denis and Y. Vallee, Synthesis, 2001,
1, 150 and references therein.
2 D. Enders and U. Reinhold, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 1895; R.
Bloch, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1407; M. Lombardo and C. Trombini,
Synthesis, 2000, 6, 759.
3 A. Dondoni, D. Perrone and M. Rinaldi, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 9252;
P. Merino, S. Franco, F. Merchan and T. Tejero, Recent Res. Dev. Synth.
Org. Chem., 1998, 1, 109; P. Merino, S. Franco, F. L. Merchan and T.
Tejero, Synlett, 2000, 4, 442; Y. Ukaji, Y. Shimizu, Y. Kenmoku, A.
Ahmed and K. Inomata, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2000, 73, 447.
4 H. M. S. Kumar, S. Anjaneyulu, E. J. Reddy and J. S. Yadav,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 9311.
5 P. Merino, S. Franco, F. L. Merchan and T. Tejero, J. Org. Chem., 1998,
63, 5627; P. Merino, E. Castillo, S. Franco, F. L. Merchan and T. Tejero,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1998, 9, 1759; J.-N. Denis, S. Tchertchian, A.
Tomassini and Y. Vallee, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 5503; D. E.
Frantz, R. Faessler and E. M. Carreira, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
11 245.
6 G. Alvaro, P. Pacioni and D. Savoia, Chem. Eur. J., 1997, 3, 726.
7 M. T. Reetz, R. Jaeger, R. Drewlies and M. Hübel, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 103.
8 F. L. Merchan, P. Merino and T. Tejero, Synth. Commun., 1994, 24,
2551.
9 P. Merino, S. Anoro, S. Franco, J. M. Gascon, V. Martin, F. L. Merchan,
J. Revuelta, T. Tejero and V. Tunon, Synth. Commun., 2000, 30, 2989;
Z.-Y. Chang and R. M. Coates, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 3475; A. M.
Palmer and V. Jäger, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 1293.
10 P. Wipf and S. Ribe, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 6454.
11 A. M. Sun and X. Huang, Synthesis, 2000, 775 and references
therein.
12 M. T. Reetz and E. M. Lauterbach, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 4481;
T. D. Lee and F. W. Keana, J. Org. Chem., 1976, 41, 3237; R. L. Craig
and J. S. Roberts, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1972, 1142; E.
Dumez and J.-P. Dulcère, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1998, 479; S.
G. Davies, S. Jones, M. A. Sanz, F. C. Teixeira and J. F. Fox, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 2235; P. Aschwanden, D. E. Frantz and E. M. Carreira,
Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 23; D. Enders and H. Kempen, Synlett, 1994, 969;
S. G. Davies and G. D. Smyth, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1996, 7, 1001;
J. Blanchet, M. Bonin, L. Micouin and H.-P. Husson, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2000, 41, 8279; M. B. Gravestock, D. W. Knight, K. M. A. Malik and
S. R. Thornton, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2000, 3292; A. Guarna,
E. G. Occhiato, M. Pizzetti, D. Scarpi, S. Sisi and M. van Sterkenburg,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2000, 11, 4227; J. E. H. Buston, I. Coldham
and K. R. Mulholland, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999, 2327; C. S.
Penkett and I. D. Simpson, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 3029.
13 K. Soai and S. Niwa, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 833; L. Pu and H.-B. Yu,
Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 757.
It is important to note that the above isomerization amounted
only to traces if the R3 substituent on the nitrogen atom was a
benzyl group: as seen in Table 1, the N-benzyl-N-allylhydrox-
ylamines 3 can be isolated in good yields. They can be readily
reduced to provide the corresponding (E)-N-benzyl-N-allyl-
amines.
In conclusion, we have shown that the sequence: terminal
alkyne hydrozirconation, Zr to Zn exchange and addition to
nitrones, is a good method to stereoselectively synthesize (E)-
N-allylhydroxylamines, under mild conditions and in good
yields. It is noteworthy that this reaction occurs with no need for
an external activating agent such as amino-alcohols.13 We are
14 Z. Li, V. Upadhyay, A. E. DeCamp, L. DiMichele and P. J. Reider,
Synthesis, 1999, 1453.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 1806–1807
1807