1122
nucleophilic attack. This can easily be explained by the fact that the ring closure involves deprotonation
of the OH group, which is hindered in the presence of acids.
(3)
The above results show that the basicity of the reaction medium has opposite effects on the palladade-
silylation and on the nucleophilic attack of the OH group. Accordingly, neutral conditions are expected
to give the best results, which can be ensured when CuCl2 is used as the reoxidant and activator of the
nucleophilic attack. Using alcoholic solvents is beneficial for both processes of eq (3). The alcoholic
solvents facilitate the elimination of the silyl group under the palladadesilylation through the formation
of stable alkyl-siloxanes, and hindering the silyl migration to the OH group of the substrate. Furthermore,
in the nucleophilic attack the solvent molecules may also act as weak bases providing assistance in the
deprotonation of the hydroxy group.
In summary, we have shown that under mild conditions allyl–silyl alcohols undergo a nucleophilic
substitution reaction in the presence of catalytic amounts of palladium salts and CuCl2. As far as we
know, this is the first example of palladium catalyzed allylic substitution of the silyl functionality by
nucleophiles. In addition, employment of a silyl leaving group offers an interesting alternative to acetate
and carbonate functionalities, which are commonly used in palladium catalyzed allylic substitution
reactions.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Swedish Natural Science Research Council (NFR).
References
1. (a) Fleming, I.; Dunogues, J.; Smithers, R. Org. React. 1989, 37, 57. (b) Fleming, I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. Rev.
1997, 97, 2063. (c) Horn, K. A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 1317. (d) Ibrahim, M. R.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 819. (e) Wilson, S. R.; Augelli-Safran, C. E. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 3983. (f) Arimoto, M.; Yamaguchi, H.; Fujita, E.;
Ochiai, M.; Nagao Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6298. Ochiai, M.; Fujita, E.; Arimoto, M.; Yamaguchi, H. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1985, 33, 41 and 989. (g) Fuchigami, T.; Yamamoto, K. Chem. Lett. 1996, 937. Chiai, M.; Fujita, E., Arimoto, M.;
Yamaguchi, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1984, 32, 5027. (h) Hu, N. X.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T.; Ogura, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 29,
4949. (i) Yoshida, J.; Murata, T.; Isoe, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3373. Takanami, T.; Suda, K.; Ohomori, H.; Masui, M.
Chem. Lett. 1986, 1335. (j) Riahi, A.; Cossy, J.; Muzart, J.; Pete, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 839.
2. (a) Macsári, I.; Hupe, E.; Szabó, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 9547. (b) Bäckvall, J.-E.; Byström, S. E.; Nordberg, R. E. J.
Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 4619. (c) Hansson, S.; Heumann, A.; Rein, T.; Åkermark, B. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 975.
3. General procedure: The iPrOH (5 ml) solution of the allylsilane (0.5 mmol), Li2PdCl4 (0.025 mmol, 5 mol%, 0.007 g) and
CuCl2 (1.25 mmol, 0.168 g) was stirred under argon for the temperatures and times listed in Table 1. After the reaction was
complete, the reaction mixture was diluted with ether, washed with brine, then dried over anhydrous MgSO4. Removal of the
solvent in vacuo and purification of the residual oil by chromatography in pentane/ether afforded the corresponding product.
4. (a) Kliegman, J. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 29, 73. (b) Hayashi, T.; Konishi, M.; Kumada, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1983, 736. (c) Ogoshi, S.; Yoshida, W.; Ohe, K.; Murai, S. Organometallics 1993, 12, 578.
5. Szabó, K. J. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1677.