Chemistry Letters 2001
1327
a dinuclear complex.6–8
Czuchajowska, and X. Feng, Inorg. Chem., 29, 4329
(1990); F. A. Cotton, and J. Czuchajowska, Polyhedron, 9,
2553 (1990); J. Hesschenbrouck, E. Solari, R. Scopelliti, C.
Floriani, and N. Re, J. Organomet. Chem., 596, 77 (2000);
J. Magull and A. Simon, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 615, 81
(1992).
S. D. Angelis, E. Solari, E. Gallo, C. Floriani, A. Chiesi-
Villa, and C. Rizzoli, Inorg. Chem., 31, 2520 (1992); Z.
Wang, K. Sakata, and M. Hashimoto, Polyhedron, 17,
4451 (1998); Z. Wang, N. Hu, K. Sakata, and M.
Hashimoto, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 1695; J.
Magull and A. Simon, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 615, 77
(1992).
M. C. Weiss, and V. L. Goedken, Inorg. Chem., 18, 819
(1979); C. E. Housmekerides, D. L. Ramage, C. M. Kretz,
J. T. Shontz, R. S. Pilato, G. L. Geoffroy, A. L. Rheingold,
and B. S. Haggerty, Inorg. Chem., 31, 4453 (1992).
P. Berno, C. Floriani, A. Chiesi-Villa, and C. Guastini, J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1989, 551.
W. J. Belcher, P. J. Brothers, A. P. Meredith, C. E. F.
Rickard, and D. C. Ware, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.,
1999, 2833.
It is very interesting that the structure of [{Ge(tmtaa)}(µ-
Cl){Ge(tmtaa)Cl}]2+ cation has no symmetry, revealing one
five- and one six-coordinate macrocyclic units. This is also dif-
ferent from O, S, CH2-bridged tmtaa dimers which have two
five-coordinate configurations and C2 symmetry, with the C2
axis passing through the bridged atoms.6–8
5
6
The distance between bridged chloro and five-coordinate
germanium (1.686(3) Å) is about 0.124 Å shorter than that
between bridged chloro and six-coordinate germanium
(1.810(3) Å). Both of them are much shorter than bond length
of six-coordinate germanium atom and the mono chloro atom
(2.433(1) Å) in the cation. Two germanium atoms are all dis-
placed from the N4 planes toward the benzenoid faces of the
saddle-shaped tmtaa ligands, as commonly observed in other
six- and five-coordinate tmtaa complexes. However, because
of the steric influence, the displacements are 0.468(2) Å in the
five-coordinate unit and 0.082(2) Å in the six-coordinate unit.
The average Ge–N bond lengths in two units are all about 1.938
Å and do not depend on coordination numbers and displace-
ments of germanium atoms from the N4 planes. This suggests
that two germanium atoms are in the same oxidation states (+4)
and that Ge dπ and N pπ orbital interaction are analogous.
Parameters characterizing the Ge(IV)–Cl–Ge(IV) bridge are of
considerable interest. The angle of Ge–Cl–Ge is 171.0(2)° and
is significantly bigger than that of other analogous tmtaa bridg-
ing configurations (155.0(8)° in Ti–O–Ti,6 142.75° in
Fe–O–Fe,6 126.3(1)° in Fe–S–Fe7 and 122.5(3)° in
Sn–CH2–Sn8). This enhances the linear configuration of the
three atoms and makes two tmtaa ligands in the complex orien-
tation at an angle of 6.534(0.110)° between the two N4 planes
which are almost parallel to each other. Furthermore, two
tmtaa ligands are rotated with respect to each other by about
90° and two groups of benzenoid rings in two tmtaa ligands are
in the face-to-face configuration, which are similar to Type I
and II dinuclear complexes.4,5 It is clear that the dimer is in the
most stable state when it adopts this configuration.
7
8
9
V. L. Goedken and J. A. Ladd, Chem. Commun., 1981,
910.
10 D. A. Atwood, V. O. Atwood, A. H. Cowley, J. L. Atwood,
and E. Roman, Inorg. Chem., 31, 3871 (1992); D. A.
Atwood, V. O. Atwood, A. H. Cowley, H. R. Gobran, and
J. L. Atwood, Inorg. Chem., 32, 4671 (1993).
11 W. J. Belcher, P. J. Brothers, M. V. Land, C. E. F. Rickard,
and D. C. Ware, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1993, 2101.
12 The yield of [{Ge(tmtaa)}(µ-Cl){Ge(tmtaa)Cl}](Cl)
[C6H4(NO2)CH2O]·CH3CN is 28% (Found: C, 56.57; H,
5.00; N, 12.67%. Calcd for C53H53Cl3Ge2N10O3: C, 56.35;
H, 4.73; N, 12.40%). λmax/nm (ε/dm3mol–1cm–1 )(CHCl3)
272 (28100), 380 (48200), 431 (20700). νmax (KBr)/cm–1
1581s, 1548s, 1471s and 1416s (C=N, C=C), 1548s and
1
1372s (N=O). H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, 293K) δ/ppm
C6H4(NO2)CH2O: 8.23 (s, 1H, 2-H), 8.13 (d, J = 7.2 Hz,
1H, 4-H), 7.69 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H, 6-H), 7.52 (dd, J = 7.2,
6.1 Hz, 1H, 5-H), 4.79 (s, 2H, CH2); [{Ge(tmtaa)}(µ-Cl)-
{Ge(tmtaa)Cl}]: 7.19, 7.15 (m, m, 8H, 8H, CH4), 5.42 (br,
s, 4H, CH), 2.53 (s, 24H, CH3); 2.00 (s, 3H, CH3CN).
Λm(CH3NO2, 298 K): 135.6 s cm2 mol–1.
We thank Mr. Daisuke Hirayama in our laboratory for X-
ray structure determination.
References and Notes
1
2
P. Mountford, Chem. Soc. Rev., 27, 105 (1998).
D. A. Summerville and I. A. Cohen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98,
1747 (1976); A. D. Cian, M. Moussavi, J. Fischer, and R.
Weiss, Inorg. Chem., 24, 3162 (1985); M. Moussavi, A. D.
Cian, J. Fischer, and R. Weiss, Inorg. Chem., 27, 1287
(1988).
13 Crystal data: [{Ge(tmtaa)}(µ-Cl){Ge(tmtaa)Cl}](Cl)
[C6H4(NO2)CH2O]·CH3CN, C53H53Cl3Ge2N10O3,Mr =
1129.61; red prism, 0.40 × 0.80 × 0.80 mm, monoclinic,
space group P21/n, a = 12.862(2), b = 21.089(3), c =
18.797(2) Å, β = 98.09(1)°, V = 5047(1) Å3, Z = 4, Dc =
1.486 g/cm3, µ = 1.404 mm–1. Using Mo Kα radiation (λ
= 0.71069 Å) at 293 K, a total of 12438 reflections was
collected (2θmax = 55.0°), of which 11591 were independ-
ent. Refinement converged to R1 = 0.055 [I > 2σ(I)] and R
= 0.095, Rw = 0.198 (all data).
3
4
C. W. Dirk, T. Inabe, K. F. Schoch, Jr., and T. J. Marks, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 1539 (1983).
D. Mandon, J. Giraudon, L. Toupet, J. Sala-Pala, and J. E.
Guerchais, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 3490 (1987); J. J. H.
Edema, S. Gambarotta, P. Sluis, W. J. J. Smeets, and A. L.
Spek, Inorg. Chem., 28, 3784 (1989); F. A. Cotton, J.