efficiency of >95% for each cycle. The PNA portions of
PNA-APNA chimeras were synthesized from Fmoc/Cbz-
protected monomers, prepared as previously described,6b
followed by oligomerization on solid support using stand-
ard chain elongation reactions.8 The oligomers were
then cleaved from the resin and purified as previously
described.5
Hybridization of APNA-PNA/DNA or APNA-PNA/
RNA Duplexes. Similar experiments were conducted with
APNA-PNA chimeras designed to form duplex structures
with DNA and RNA. A base sequence previously described
by Nielsen and co-workers was chosen so that we could make
direct comparisons to published data (i.e., oligomer 13, Table
3).10,11 In our hands, the PNA decamer 13 gave Tm values of
Hybridization of (APNA-PNA)2:DNA or (APNA-PNA)2:
RNA Triplexes. The hybridization properties of triplexes
between the PNA decamer 9 and complementary DNA or
RNA were examined by Tm measurements and compared to
those of the APNA-PNA chimeras 10-12 (Table 2). The
Table 3. Summary of Tm Values for Complexes Formed
between PNA 13-17 and Oligonucleotides 20-26
a
Tm of PNA strand
target strand
13
14
15
16
17
24
<10
26
Table 2. Summary of Tm Values for Complexes Formed
between PNA 9-12 and DNA 18 or RNA 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
54
39
58
42
34b
36
44
40
34
48
31
27
nd
nd
30
26
38
27
nd
17
nd
43
28
45
28
nd
nd
38
a
Tm of PNA strand
20
nd
nd
nd
target strand
9
10
11
12
18
19
34
51
27
40
26
35
29
38
a Duplex concentration ) 4-5 µM. Tm experiments were performed as
described for data presented in Table 2. Buffer conditions: 100 mM NaCl,
10 mM NaH2PO4, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH ) 7.0. b Mismatched base in
compounds 24-26 is indicated in bold text (see Table 1).
a PNA:DNA or PNA:RNA molar ratio was 1:1. Solutions were 4-5 µM
in both PNA and DNA or RNA. Samples were heated from 5 to 95 °C
and/or cooled from 90 to 5 °C at a rate of 0.5 °/min, and the absorbance at
260 nm was monitored as a function of temperature. Tm values are the
maxima of the first derivative plots of the absorbance versus temperature
data. Buffer conditions: 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 0.1 mM EDTA,
pH ) 7.0.
54 °C (antiparallel, 13:21) and 39 °C (parallel, 13:22) with
DNA (Table 3)12 and slightly higher values with RNA (Tm
) 58 °C for antiparallel, 13:23) and (Tm ) 42 °C for parallel,
13:24). Surprisingly, the degree of destabilization observed
upon introduction of a single APNA unit in the middle of
an antiparallel PNA:DNA duplex (Table 3, 14:20) was far
greater than that observed for the PNA2:DNA triplex (Table
2, 10:18). However, the degree of destabilization observed
with the parallel PNA:DNA, antiparallel PNA:RNA and
parallel PNA:RNA duplexes was similar in magnitude to that
observed with the corresponding triplexes reported in Table
2.
Subsequently, the effects of longer APNA inserts into the
APNA-PNA chimeras were examined. Incorporation of two
APNA units (decamer 15) led to further destabilization of
the complexes formed with both DNA (15:20 and 15:21)
and RNA (15:22 and 15:23). However, chimeras 16 which
is composed of four APNA units at the N-terminal of the
decamer did not exhibit the same degree of destabilization
per APNA insert as chimera 15 relative to the control
oligomer 13. These results further support the existence of
some cooperative intraresidue interaction between adjacent
APNA momoners that enhances the stability of the duplexes
hybridization affinities of all the oligomers with comple-
mentary antiparallel RNA strands were always greater than
those observed with the complementary antiparallel DNA
strands, consistent with the known properties of PNAs (Table
1).1 Although the APNA-PNA chimeras 10-12 gave com-
plexes with both DNA and RNA that were thermally less
stable than those of the PNA decamer 9, they were
significantly more stable than the corresponding DNA:DNA
and DNA:RNA complexes under the same conditions (data
not shown). The destabilization observed with chimera 10
was consistent with our previous hybridization results for
this class of monomer.5 Moreover, since APNA-PNA
decamer 12 was found to hybridize equally or more favorably
than the APNA-PNA decamers 10 and 11, it seemed that
multiple insertions of APNA monomers into PNA oligomers
was well tolerated. Job plots9 confirmed a 2:1 stoichiometry
of binding between the PNA strands, or the APNA-PNA
chimeras, and the DNA or RNA oligomers. In addition, the
Tm values showed a dependence on the pH of the solution,
indicating that the complexes formed were most likely tri-
plexes, presumably involving Watson-Crick and Ho¨ogsteen
base pairing.
(10) (a) Hyrup, B.; Egholm, M.; Nielson, P. E.; Wittung, P.; Norde´n,
B.; Buchardt, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7964. (b) Sforza, S.; Haaima,
G.; Marchelli, R.; Nielsen, P. E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 197, 7-204.
(11) In some cases the N-terminal of the oligomers are capped with an
acetate unit in order to prevent acyl transfer of the last nucleobase-
carboxymethyl moiety. However, this measure was not taken with chimeras
14-17 since the sequences studied in ref 13 were not capped in this way.
For comments on the influence a positively charged N-terminal has on the
stability of PNA:DNA complexes, see: Egholm, M.; Buchardt, O.; Nielsen,
P. E.; Berg, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1895.
(7) (a) Chang, C.-D.; Felix, A. M.; Jimenez, M. H.; Meienhofer, J. Int.
J. Pept. Protein Res. 1980, 15, 485. (b) Peptide and Peptidomimetic
Synthesis. Reagents for Drug DiscoVery; Fluka Chemie GmbH: Buchs,
2000; p 123.
(8) (a) Christensen, L.; Fitzpatrick, R.; Gildea, B.; Petersen, K. H.;
Hansen, H. F.; Koch, T.; Egholm, M.; Buchardt, O.; Nielsen, P. E.; Coull,
J.; Berg, R. H. J. Pept. Sci. 1995, 3, 175. (b) Christensen, L.; Fitzpatrick,
R.; Gildea, B.; Petersen, K. H.; Hansen, H. F.; Koch, T.; Egholm, M.;
Buchardt, O.; Nielson, P. E. J. Pept. Sci. 1995, 1(3), 185.
(9) Job, P. Ann. Chim. (Paris) 1928, 9, 113-203.
(12) The Tm value given for this PNA sequence in refs 10a,b was 50 °C
in the case of the antiparallel complex.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 1, 2002
65