4808
S. Rossiter et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 4806–4808
Table 3. LD99 values of compounds 12–16 against susceptible and drug-resistant nematodes
Compound
LD99 (lg/mL)
H. contortus H. contortus VSRG,
susceptible
H. contortus Lawes,
H. contortus CAVR, T. colubriformis O. circumcincta
ivermectin resistant
benzimidazole resistant levamisole and
benzimidazole resistant
12
13
14
15
16
1
13
13
4.4
8.8
6.3
6.3
3.1
25
50
13
6.3
6.3
6.3
3.1
3.1
0.16
1.6
6.3
3.1
2.2
5
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
6.3
3.1
3.1
3.1
6.3
3.1
1.6
1.6
5
>100
0.16
0.78
nt
nt
nt
nt
2
1.6
nt, not tested.
3. Jones, K.; Roset, X.; Rossiter, S.; Whitfield, P. J. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 4380.
Compounds 12–16 were tested against susceptible
strains of H. contortus, strains resistant to benzothiaz-
oles (VSRG strain), ivermectin (CAVR strain) or both
benzothiazoles and levamisole (Lawes strain) plus sus-
ceptible strains of Trichostrongylus colubriformis and
Ostertagia circumcincta. Results are shown in Table 3,
with activities of thiabendazole 1 and levamisole 2 for
comparison.
4. Perrett, S.; Whitfield, P. J. Planta Med. 1995, 61, 276.
5. Rossiter, S. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1999.
6. Ziegler, E.; Gelfert, K. Monatsh. Chem. 1959, 90, 822.
7. Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457.
8. Synthesis of arylquinolines: typical procedure: 8-bromo-
2,4-dimethoxyquinoline (0.4 g, 1.5 mmol) was dissolved
in toluene (10 mL) under argon. Tetrakis-(triphenylphos-
phine)palladium (0) (52 mg, 3 mol%) and aqueous sodi-
um carbonate (2 mL of a 2 M solution) were added, and
the mixture was stirred for 5 min. Benzeneboronic acid
(0.20 g, 1.7 mmol) in ethanol (1 mL) was added, and the
mixture was then heated under reflux for 48 h. After
cooling, the mixture was poured into a separating funnel,
and the reaction flask was washed with water (20 mL)
and ether (20 mL); the washings being added to the
separating funnel. The aqueous layer was extracted with
ether (3 · 20 mL), and the combined organic layers were
dried over magnesium sulfate before removal of the
solvent under reduced pressure. The crude product was
purified by column chromatography (9:1 hexane–EtOAc)
to yield 90% of 2,4-dimethoxy-8-phenylquinoline as white
plates, mp (CH2Cl2/MeOH) 110–112 ꢁC; found M+:
265.1105, C17H15NO2 requires 265.1103; 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d 8.16 (1H, dd, J 8.2, 1.5 Hz, H5), 7.90 (2H,
dd, J 8.3, 1.5 Hz, H20, H60), 7.77 (1H, dd, J 7.2, 1.5 Hz,
H7), 7.54 (2H, m, H6 and H40), 7.47 (2H, dd, J 8.3,
7.2 Hz, H30, H50), 6.29 (1H, s, H3), 4.01 (3H, s, OMe),
3.99 (3H, s, OMe); 13C NMR (CDCl3): d 164.5, 163.4
(C2, C4), 144.7, 140.4, 138.5 (C10, C8, C8a), 131.3, 131.1,
127.9, 127.2, 123.5, 121.8 (C5, C6, C7, C20–60), 120.1
(C4a), 90.7 (C3), 56.2 (OMe), 53.8 (OMe); Anal. Calcd
for C17H15NO2: C, 76.96; H, 5.70; N, 5.28. Found: C,
76.91; H, 5.65; N, 5.19.
Of these compounds, 15 and 16 exhibited the greatest
activity against susceptible strains of H. contortus
(3.1 lg/mL), comparable in potency to levamisole. Com-
pounds 15 and 16 were also active against the various
drug-resistant strains of H. contortus, with 16 proving
to be even more potent (LD99 1.6 lg/mL) against both
the multiple-resistant Lawes strain and the ivermectin-
resistant CAVR strain. There is also evidence of activity
against the important parasitic nematodes T. colubrifor-
mis and O. circumcincta.
In summary, we have prepared novel arylquinolines in
good yield via Suzuki coupling of substituted bromo-
quinolines. We have demonstrated that a number of
these quinolines, in particular the 6-arylquinolines 15
and 16, show promising potency against susceptible
and drug-resistant strains of an important nematode tar-
get and represent a new class of anthelmintic compounds.
There is obvious potential for lead optimization and fur-
ther development to offer a new line of defence against
drug-resistant parasitic nematode infections.
9. (a) Lacey, E.; Redwin, J. M.; Gill, J. H.; Demargheriti,
V. M.; Waller, P. J. In Resistance of Parasites to
Antiparasitic Drugs; MSD AGVET: Rahway, NJ, USA,
p 177; (b) NemaTox assay: 80–100 nematode eggs were
added to each well of a multiwell plate containing the
compound under investigation (at a range of concentra-
tions from 100 lg/mL downwards in sequential twofold
dilutions) in an agar matrix. The wells were supplement-
ed with nutrient medium and incubated at 26 ꢁC until
larvae in the control wells had developed to the 1.3 larval
stage. On Day 5, a qualitative assessment of the larvae
was performed to determine the lowest concentration at
which development was inhibited in 99% of the larvae
present.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust student-
ship (S.R.). The authors thank Schering-Plough Animal
Health for arranging the biological testing.
References and notes
1. Albonico, M.; Bickle, Q.; Ramsan, M.; Montresor, A.;
Savioli, L.; Taylor, M. Bull. World Health Organ. 2003,
81, 343.
2. (a) Besier, R. B.; Love, S. C. J. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 2003, 43,
1383; (b) Thomaz-Soccol, V.; de Souza, F. P.; Sotomaior,
C.; Castro, E. A.; Milczewski, V.; Mocelin, G.; Silva, M.
D. C. P. E. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2004, 47, 41.
10. Stavenuier, J.; Hamzink, M.; van der Hulst, R.;
Zomer, G.; Westra, G.; Kriek, E. Heterocycles 1987,
10, 2711.