A R T I C L E S
Crich and Dudkin
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
underwent rapid isomerization to the R-anomer simply on
standing in deuteriochloroform and could not be isolated.7 We
reasoned that the poor diastereoselectivity observed was a
function of the low nucleophilicity of 8 and that this might be
countermanded by moving to a less polar solvent. This would
enhance the stability of the triflate 10 and so suppress R-selec-
tive, dissociative mechanisms in favor of â-selective, associative
ones. This argument holds whether the nucleophilic displace-
ment of triflate from 10 is a true SN2 reaction or, as is quite
possible, proceeds via attack on a contact ion pair that is in
dynamic equilibrium with 10. In the event, in toluene at -78
°C, the reaction was completely selective and afforded only 12
in 56% isolated yield (Scheme 2) with the mass balance
consisting mainly of 2,3-di-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-D-
mannopyranose, that is, the hydrolysis product of 10. We first
attempted deprotection of 12 by hydrogenolysis but, under all
conditions assayed, noted substantial hydrolysis and the forma-
tion of D-mannopyranose. We therefore turned to the Birch
reduction and found that exposure of 12 to sodium in liquid
ammonia, followed by quenching with ammonium chloride,
minimized this problem and enabled the isolation of 3, as its
sodium salt, in 92% yield. Importantly, no anomerization was
observed during the deprotection process and 3 was isolated in
the form of a single diastereomer. Its anomeric configuration
was confirmed by the NOE correlation of its anomeric hydrogen
synthesis of â-mannosyl phosphates dictated that we begin our
study with a model investigation. Accordingly, the phytanyl
â-mannosyl phosphate 3 was selected as a first target. Toward
this end commercial phytol, a mixture of isomers, was reduced
over Adam’s catalyst to give phytanol 4 quantitatively. Benzyl
2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite 5 was prepared
in 94% yield from commercial 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropyl-
chlorophosphoramidite and benzyl alcohol in the presence of
Hunig’s base and coupled with 4 in the presence of tetrazole
giving 6, which was immediately oxidized with tert-butyl
hydroperoxide to provide 7 in 96% overall yield from 4 (Scheme
1). Treatment of 7 with tetrabutylammonium hydroxide in a
dichloromethane/water biphasic system then afforded the salt
8 quantitatively (Scheme 1).
The R-mannosyl sulfoxide 9,8 a single diastereomer,13 was
converted at -78 °C to the triflate 10,14 by treatment of a
dichloromethane solution with triflic anhydride in the presence
of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine (DTBMP). Two equiva-
lents of salt 8 were added and the resulting mixture was stirred
for several hours before quenching, extraction, and chromato-
graphic separation. In this manner, the R- and â-mannosyl
phosphates 11 and 12 were isolated in 63 and 11% yields,
respectively (Scheme 2). Both anomers were approximately 1/1
mixtures of diastereomers at phosphorus and, in 12, these could
be separated even if the configuration was not assigned. The
anomeric configuration of 11 and 12 was assigned on the basis
of the chemical shifts of the mannose H5 signals, especially
that of the â-anomer 12 (δ 3.41 and 3.44 for the two
diastereomers at P), which is diagnostic of configuration in 4,6-
O-benzylidene protected mannopyranosides.8 Although the
diastereoselectivity of this process was disappointing, the
isolation of 12, following chromatography on silica gel, was
viewed as very encouraging given that Schmidt and co-workers
had reported that a related dibenzyl â-mannosyl phosphate
1
to both H3 and H5 as well as by its anomeric JCH coupling15
of 157.6 Hz.12
With the essential methodology established, we turned to the
preparation of the branched C30 alcohol 13 required for the
synthesis of 1. As the structure of 1 had been deduced purely
from mass spectral considerations, no information was available
regarding the relative or absolute stereochemistry of the five
stereogenic centers in the isoprenoid chain.1,16 In the absence
of any stereochemical information or of a rational hypothesis
predicting a particular stereoisomer, a stereorandom synthesis
was designed with a view to expediency and the verification of
(15) Bock, K.; Pedersen, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1974, 293-297.
(16) The original report1 on the isolation, structural elucidation, and activity of
1 and 2 did not consider, being based solely on mass spectrometric evidence,
the relative and absolute stereochemistry of the five stereogenic centers in
their isoprenoid chains. It was further reported1 that a semisynthetic fully
saturated C35 â-mannosyl phosphoisoprenoid, obtained by transfer of
mannose from GDP mannose to a pure, naturally derived saturated
polyprenol with a mannosyl transferase, had a comparable effect on the
proliferation of human CD1 c-restricted T-cell lines to that of 1 and 2.
Given that the exact location of methylation (the first methyl of this model
compound being one methylene unit closer to the phosphate than in 1 and
2) does not have a significant effect on activity, it is unlikely that the
absolute and relative stereochemistry of the chain in 1 and 2 has a major
influence on the activity of these compounds.
(9) Crich, D. In Glycochemistry. Principles, Synthesis, and Applications; Wang,
P. G., Bertozzi, C. R., Eds.; Dekker: New York, 2001, pp 53-75.
(10) Besra, G. S.; Sievert, T.; Lee, R. E.; Slayden, R. A.; Brennan, P. J.;
Takayama, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 12735-12739.
(11) Yokoyama, K.; Ballou, C. E. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 21621-21628.
(12) Crich, D.; Dudkin, V. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3941-3943.
(13) Crich, D.; Mataka, J.; Sun, S.; Lam, K.-C.; Rheingold, A. R.; Wink, D. J.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 2763-2764.
(14) Crich, D.; Sun, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11217-11223.
9
2264 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 10, 2002