Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 299–301
spectrum of 5c (Y = +NH2Cl–), an LC/MS analysis was performed
imidazolone cycle in 6 [Figure 1(b)] is planar (within 0.01 Å).
The torsion angle C(6)C(3)C(1)C(12) that characterizes the mutual
disposition of phenyl substituents in 6 is 3.8(3)°, with the angle
between their mean planes being 66.0(3)°. As the molecule lacks
any convenient proton donors, in a crystal it forms weak C–H···O
and C–H···p contacts only.
In summary, the herein discovered contraction of the perhydro-
triazine cycle in 3-oxo-, 3-thioxo- and 3-iminoperhydroimidazo-
[4,5-e][1,2,4]triazin-6-ones to the imidazolidine cycle may serve
as a new synthetic pathway to prepare glycolurils and their analogues,
which may promote their wider use in medicinal chemistry and
related areas.
that confirmed a presence of the molecular ion with m/z 322.1.
According to the X-ray data, compound 5b [Figure 1(a)] crys-
tallizes in a centrosymmetric space group Pbca. The imidazolidine
cycles in this bicyclic system have an envelope conformation
with the atoms C(1) and C(3) deviated by 0.43(1) and 0.41(1) Å
in dimethyl-substituted and NH containing fragments, respec-
tively; the angle between their mean planes being 71.8(2)°. The
pseudotorsion angle C(5)C(1)C(3)C(11) is equal to 26.3(2)°; the
angle between the phenyl rings is 46.9(2)°.
In a crystal of 5b, the molecules are held together by N(3)–
H···O(2) and N(4)–H···O(1) hydrogen bonds of intermediate
strength [N···O 2.804(2) and 2.867(2) Å, ÐNHO 176(1) and
160(1)°]. The resulting H-bonded chains are assembled in a 3D
framework by various weak interactions of C–H···O and C–H···p
types.
References
1 T. J. Schwan, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1983, 20, 547.
2 G. A. Gazieva, S. V. Vasilevskii, P. A. Belyakov, Yu. V. Nelyubina, E. D.
Lubuzh and A. N. Kravchenko, Mendeleev Commun., 2010, 20, 285.
3 A. N. Kravchenko, G. A. Gazieva, V. V. Baranov, L. V. Anikina, Yu. B.
Vikharev, I. O. Krylova, M. V. Zlygosteva and N. N. Makhova, Abstracts
of Scientific Conference ‘Biologically Active Substances: Fundamental
and Applied Problems’, Novy Svet, AR Crimea, Ukraine, May 23–28,
2011, p.96.
4 H. B. Jenson, P. Heard and M. P. Moyer, Toxicology, 1999, 133 (1), 35.
5 M. D. Rosa and P. Haberfield, J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 2639.
6 S. V. Vasilevskii, Yu. V. Nelyubina and A. N. Kravchenko, Mendeleev
Commun., 2009, 19, 279.
Compound 6 has already been described in literature;10 how-
ever, no X-ray diffraction data for it were available to date. The
‡
Crystallographic data.
Crystals of 5b (C18H18N4O2, M = 322.36) are orthorhombic, space group
Pbca, at 120 K: a = 16.405(5), b = 11.891(4) and c = 16.595(5) Å, V =
= 3237.2(17) Å3, Z = 8 (Z' = 1), dcalc = 1.323 g cm–3, m(MoKa) = 0.89 cm–1,
F(000) = 1360.
Crystals of 6 (C17H16N2O, M = 264.32) are monoclinic, space group
P21/n, at 120 K: a = 5.9478(6), b = 16.7752(18) and c = 13.4216(14) Å,
b = 90.408(2)°, V = 1339.1(2) Å3, Z = 4 (Z' = 1), dcalc = 1.311 g cm–3,
m(MoKa) = 0.83 cm–1, F(000) = 560.
7 H. Biltz, Ber., 1908, 41, 1387.
8 H. Biltz, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1909, 368, 270.
9 D. Kuehling, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1973, 263.
Intensities of 16375 and 14537 reflections for 5b and 6, respectively, were
measured with a Bruker SMART 1000 CCD diffractometer [l(MoKa) =
= 0.71072 Å, w-scans, 2q < 58°]. Then 3873 and 3553 independent reflec-
tions [Rint = 0.0476 for 5b and 0.0468 for 6] were used in further refine-
ment. The structures were solved by the direct method and refined by the
full-matrix least-squares technique against F2 in the anisotropic–isotropic
approximation. The hydrogen atoms of NH groups in 5b were located
from the Fourier density synthesis. The H(C) atom positions were cal-
culated. All hydrogen atoms were refined in the isotropic approximation
within riding model. For 5b, the refinement converged to wR2 = 0.1432
and GOF = 1.001 for all the independent reflections [R1 = 0.0541 was
calculated against F for 2101 observed reflections with I > 2s(I)]. For 6,
the refinement converged to wR2 = 0.1043 and GOF = 1.002 for all the
independent reflections [R1 = 0.0428 was calculated against F for 2203
observed reflections with I > 2s(I)]. All calculations were performed
using SHELXTL PLUS 5.0.17
10 Y. B. Kim, Ch. S. Kim and Ch. K. Lee, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1994, 31,
1653.
11 H. Petersen, Synthesis, 1973, 243.
12 A. N. Kravchenko, A. S. Sigachev, E. Yu. Maksareva, G. A. Gazieva,
N. S. Trunova, B. V. Lozhkin, T. S. Pivina, M. M. Il’in, K. A. Lyssenko,
Yu. V. Nelyubina, V. A. Davankov, O. V. Lebedev, N. N. Makhova and
V. A. Tartakovsky, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2005, 680 (Russ. Chem.
Bull., Int. Ed., 2005, 54, 691).
13 Ch. Broan and A. Butler, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2, 1991, 1501.
14 C. F. Marcos, O. A. Rakitin and T. Torroba, Recent Res. Dev. Org. Chem.,
1998, 2, 145.
15 O. A. Rakitin and L. S. Konstantinova, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem., 2008,
96, 175.
16 R. G. Neville, J. Org. Chem., 1958, 23, 1588.
17 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXTL v. 5.10, Structure Determination Software
Suite, Bruker AXS, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1998.
CCDC 907773 and 907774 contain the supplementary crystallographic data
for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
For details, see ‘Notice to Authors’, Mendeleev Commun., Issue 1, 2012.
Received: 30th May 2012; Com. 12/3934
– 301 –