G. Marc, A. Stana, A. Pîrna˘u et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1241 (2021) 130629
132.984, 128.350, 127.076, 124.172, 122.401, 122.023, 116.990,
116.647, 115.759, 44.044, 31.172; FT IR (KBr) νmax cm−1: 3408
its spectral analysis (Tables 1–3) allowed us to analyze this type of
signal and to observe how it can influence the interpretation of the
1H NMR spectrum in the spectral area of interest, 8.5–14 ppm. In
the case of compound 5a, it is obvious that the single broad sig-
nal given by a deshielded proton is given by the phenolic moiety
at 10.446 ppm. Because the broad signal characteristic to its much
deshielded proton at 12.431 ppm totally disappeared, it is obvious
that the alkylation took place at the nitrogen atom. A similar situ-
ation is found for the compound 5b, where the broad signal of the
deshielded proton of the phenol can be found at 10.370 ppm. The
supplementary peak given by the proton from the amino group is
found as a strong sharp signal at 10.198 ppm (Table 1). Guided by
the appearance and the chemical shift of this proton, this type of
proton cannot be confused with the proton of an amide or with
that of a thiazolidinedione.
=
(Ar-OH), 1734, 1708, 1672 (C O); MS: m/z = 426.1 (M + 1).
(Z)−2-(5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)−2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)-N-
(thiazol-2-yl)acetamide (5d): yellow solid; m.p. carbonization >
280 °C; yield = 58%; 1H NMR (DMSO–d6, 500 MHz) δ: 12.705
(br, 1H, NH), 10.689 (br, 1H, OH), 7.892 (s, 1H, -CH2-), 7.524 (d,
J = 9 Hz, 2H, Ar), 7.501 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H, Th), 7.270 (d, J = 3.5 Hz,
1H, Th), 7.009 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H, Ar), 4.639 (s, 2H, -CH2-); 13C
NMR (DMSO–d6, 125 MHz) δ: 167.770, 165.859, 164.488, 163.221,
161.093, 138.219, 134.748, 133.152, 124.081, 117.032, 116.598,
114.499, 43.806; FT IR (KBr) νmax cm−1: 3426 (Ar-OH), 1735, 1699,
=
1467 (C O); MS: m/z = 362.1 (M + 1).
(Z)-ethyl 2-(2-(5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)−2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-
yl)acetamido)−4-methylthiazole-5-carboxylate (5e): yellow solid;
m.p. carbonization > 265 °C; yield=63%; 1H NMR (DMSO–d6,
500 MHz) δ: 13.073 (br, 1H, NH), 10.618 (br, 1H, OH), 7.884 (s, 1H,
-CH2-), 7.515 (d, J = 9 Hz, 2H, Ar), 6.997 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar),
4.669 (s, 2H, -CH2-), 4.229 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, -CH2-), 2.551 (s, 3H,
-CH3), 1.264 (t, J = 7 Hz, 3H, Th); 13C NMR (DMSO–d6, 125 MHz)
δ: 167.728, 166.092, 165.789, 162.423, 161.058, 159.483, 156.571,
134.797, 133.159, 124.088, 117.011, 116.563, 115.052, 61.073, 43.946,
17.440, 14.626; FT IR (KBr) νmax cm−1: 3408 (Ar-OH), 1714, 1711,
This second type of alkylating agents used, the chloroacetamide
derivatives 4c-f aimed at obtaining the other final compounds (5c-
f), bearing an amide group. Based on these facts, the signals char-
acteristic to the proton from the amide group in the 8.5–14 ppm
spectral area were analyzed. In the compounds 5c-e, the aro-
matic amide gave the supplementary expected signals as broad,
between 12.705–13.078 ppm and the phenolic proton between
10.508–10.689 ppm. For compound 5f, the aliphatic amide gave the
supplementary expected signal as sharp at 8.899 ppm and the phe-
nolic proton at 10.372 ppm (Table 1).
=
1675, 1658 (C O); MS: m/z = 448.3 (M + 1).
(Z)−2-(5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)−2,4-dioxothiazolidin-3-yl)-N-
((2-phenylthiazol-4-yl) methyl)acetamide (5f): yellow solid; m.p.
232–233 °C; yield = 61%; 1H NMR (DMSO–d6, 500 MHz) δ: 10.373
(br, 1H, OH), 8.899 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H, NH), 7.947 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.882
(s, 1H, -CH=), 7.535–7.506 (m, 5H, Ar), 7.457 (s, 1H, Th), 6.945
(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar), 4.465 (d, J = 6 Hz, 2H, -CH2-), 4.377 (s,
2H, -CH2-); 13C NMR (DMSO–d6, 125 MHz) δ: 167.847, 167.665,
166.048, 165.845, 160.771, 155.192, 134.286, 133.481, 133.145,
130.758, 129.736, 126.572, 124.284, 117.039, 116.941, 116.130,
43.946, 39.774; FT IR (KBr) νmax cm−1: 3401 (Ar-OH), 1728, 1681,
The electrons conjugation effect found in the parent compound
2 between the benzylidene nucleus and thiazolidine-2,4–dione is
present in the final compounds 5a-f too. The alkylation of com-
pound 2 (whether N-alkylation or O-alkylation would take place)
would not make the conjugation of electrons disappear, but the
substitution on the nitrogen or oxygen atoms would influence the
conjugation of electrons and consequent the changes in the chem-
ical shift of protons can be found.
For a better analysis of the signals, we have used the spec-
tral data of a supplementary compound (6), previously reported
by our group [4,23]. This compound has a similar structure with
the parent compound 2, but has the oxygen atom substituted with
a carbon atom. Compound 6 can be considered an O-alkylated
derivative of compound 2, but it was obtained by another syn-
thetic route, independent of compound 2 and independent of
the hypothesis studied in the present paper, being obtained by
Knoevenagel condensation between p-methoxybenzaldehyde and
thiazolidin-2,4–dione in alkaline environment. Spectral data of
compound 6 was used in the present paper for spectral com-
parison, to strengthen the previously formulated conclusion, that
under the reaction conditions presented in the hypothesis, takes
place the N-alkylation of compound 2, not the O-alkylation.
The benzylidene proton from the parent compound 2 was found
at 7.699 ppm, while in compounds 5a-f it was found between
7.882–7.907 ppm. Comparing to the chemical shift of this proton
from the compound 2, in compounds 5a-f, the benzylidene pro-
ton appears with 0.208–0.183 ppm (average 0.192 ppm) downfield.
On the other hand, compared to the signal given by the benzyli-
dene proton in compound 6 (substituted at the oxygen atom sub-
stituted with methyl), it appears at 7.687 ppm, with a deviation of
only 0.012 ppm. Therefore, the benzylidene proton being negligi-
bly influenced by the presence of the carbon atom on the phe-
nolic oxygen, the shift to higher values is due to the substitu-
tion at the level of the nitrogen atom in the case of compounds
5a-f.
=
1663 (C O); MS: m/z = 452.3 (M + 1).
The molecular peaks found for all final compounds 5a-f sug-
gested that alkylation took place at just one out of the two possible
atoms (N or O) of the (Z)−5-(4-hydroxybenzylidene)-thiazolidine-
2,4–dione.
Analyzing the IR spectrum, the two peaks of the potential aryl-
alkyl ether, which could appear in case of the O-alkylation, given
by the symmetric stretch (near 1040 cm−1) and the asymmet-
ric stretch (near 1250 cm−1) of the etheric bonds C O C are not
found, suggesting that alkylation took place on the nitrogen atom
for all final compounds 5a-f and not on the phenolic oxygen.
Comparing the 1H NMR spectrum of the (Z)−5-(4-
hydroxybenzylidene)-thiazolidine-2,4–dione (compound 2) with
its parent compound thiazolidine-2,4–dione (compound 1), the
most deshielded proton gave a broad signal at 12.023 ppm in
the compound 1, respectively at 12.431 ppm in the compound 2,
by the NH proton. The other supplementary broad signal found
for compound 2 in the 1H NMR spectrum, corresponding to a
less deshielded proton at 10.310 ppm is given by the phenolic
hydrogen. After assignment of the protons from the structure of
compound 2 that gave these broad signals, further analysis of
the 1H NMR spectrum of the resulted 5a-f compounds can be
performed, to trace the appearance or disappearance of signals of
interest.
–
–
Structurally, compounds 4a and 4b are chloromethyl azoles.
These compounds have no amide groups in their structures. The
reason for choosing these two compounds was that they would
not give in the 1H NMR spectrum signals of the amide NH group,
which could interfere with the observation in the same spectral
zone of signal characteristic to the NH proton of thiazolidinedione
moiety or the phenolic OH proton. Compound 4b has, in addition
to 4a, a secondary aromatic amine. This compound’s synthesis and
The four benzylidene protons on the aromatic nucleus that ap-
pear as two coupled doublets (J = 8.5 Hz or J = 9 Hz), are found
in the spectrum of the parent compound 2 at 7.454 ppm and
6.919 ppm, respectively. Two benzylidene protons are found in
compounds 5a-f at 0.059–0.099 ppm (average 0.074 ppm) down-
field compared to the parent compound 2, while in compound
3