of these natural products and analogues have been achieved,4
but despite efforts by several research groups, the mechanism
of action of these compounds remains unknown.5
Scheme 1a
Taking into account the SAR correlation of cephalostatins
and OSW-1,6 a related cholestane glycoside isolated from a
terrestrial plant, it was hypothesized that the active inter-
mediate might be an oxycarbenium ion located at rings E or
F and originated by opening of the dioxaspiro grouping.7
We can deduce from this that the stereochemistries at C-22,
C-23, and C-25, which doubtless have a strong influence on
the stability of the dioxaspiro[4.4]nonane system, may also
influence the activity of cephalostatins.
With these ideas in mind, we decided to develop a simple
methodology to permit the synthesis of all possible isomers
of this system by modification of the steroidal side chain of
a spirostan sapogenin, the key step being an intramolecular
hydrogen abstraction reaction (IHA) promoted by alkoxy
radicals.8 In previous papers from this laboratory, we have
demonstrated the utility of IHA reactions in the synthesis of
dioxaspiro[4.4]nonane ring systems in the carbohydrate
field.9
The synthesis starts with 3-methoxy-23-oxotigogenin (2)
(Scheme 1) prepared using a previously described procedure
by oxidation of 3-methoxytigogenin (1) with NaNO2/BF3‚
Et2O.10 The reduction of 2 with L-Selectride gave a mixture
of alcohols 3 and 4 (72%, 1.7:1) from which the alcohol 3
with the correct natural orientation (23R) could be obtained
in moderate yield. The reduction of 2 with NaBH4 afforded
preferentially the non-natural isomer 4 (91%, 19:1). In these
preliminary studies we decided to continue with the natural
diastereoisomeric alcohol 3. The regio- and stereoselective
opening reaction of the tigogenin dioxaspiro[5.4]decane
system present in 3 was accomplished with Ph2SiH2/TiCl4
to give diol 5 in 67% yield.11
a Reagent and conditions: (a) NaNO2, BF3‚Et2O, AcOH, rt, 1 h,
68%; (b) NaBH4, EtOH, rt, 1 h, 91% (3/4 ratio 5:95) or L-Selectride,
THF, -20 °C, 2 h, 72% (3/4 ratio 63:37); (c) Ph2SiH2, TiCl4,
CH2Cl2, -20 °C, 1.5 h, 67%; (d) pivaloyl chloride, Py, CH2Cl2, rt,
24 h, 96%; (e) tBuMe2SiOTf, CH2Cl2, Et3N, rt, 3 h, 81%; (f) KOH,
MeOH, 50 °C, 24 h, 92%; (g) (i) o-NO2PhSeCN, n-Bu3P, THF, rt,
0.5 h, 99%, (ii) H2O2, THF, rt, 3 h, 92%; (h) (i) OsO4, Py, CH2Cl2,
rt, 1.5 h, (ii) Ac2O, py, rt, 99% (10/11 ratio 1:2).
Conversion of 5 to the monoprotected primary alcohol 8
was accomplished by a protection-deprotection sequence
involving formation of the primary pivalate 6 (96%),
silylation with TBSOTf (81%), and hydrolysis of pivalate 7
with KOH/MeOH (92%). Nitrophenylselenenylation of the
primary alcohol in 8 followed by oxidative elimination
furnished alkene 9 in 92% yield. Osmylation of the double
bond and subsequent acetylation afforded tertiary alcohols
10 and 11 (99%, 1:2).12
The IHA reaction was carried out by separately treating
compounds 10 and 11 with (diacetoxyiodo)benzene and
iodine under irradiation with two 80 W tungsten-filament
lamps at 50 °C. Alcohol 10 afforded a mixture of the
dioxaspirocycles 12 and 13 (83%, 28:72) while alcohol 11
gave compounds 17 and 18 (83%, 33:67) (Scheme 2). The
desired diols 14, 15 and 19, 20 (Scheme 2) were subsequently
obtained by hydrolysis of the silyl and acetate protective
groups, the structures of which were determined by extensive
1H and 13C NMR 1D and 2D studies including DEPT, COSY,
HMBC, HSQC, and NOESY experiments and confirmed by
X-ray crystallography analysis of compounds 15 and 20. The
(4) (a) Dro¨gemu¨ller, M.; Jautelat, R.; Winterfeld, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1572-1574. (b) LaCour, T. G.; Guo, C.; Bhandaru, S.;
Boyd, M. R.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 692-707. (c)
Dro¨gemu¨ller, M.; Flessner, T.; Jautelat, R.; Scholz, U.; Winterfeld, E. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 2811-2831. (d) Kim, S.; Sutton, S. C.; Guo, C.;
LaCour, T. G.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2056-2070. (e)
Jeong, J. U.; Guo, C.; Fuchs, P. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2071-
2084. (f) For a short review, see: Ganesan, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 611-615.
(5) LaCour, T. G.; Guo, C.; Boyd, M. R.; Fuchs, P. L. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 33-36.
(6) (a) Guo, C.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1099-1102.
(b) Deng, S.; Yu, B.; Lou, Y.; Hui, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 202-208.
(c) Yu, W.; Jin, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3369-3370.
(7) (a) Guo, C.; LaCour, T. G.; Fuchs, P. L. Bioorg., Med. Chem. Lett.
1999, 9, 419-424. (b) Guo, C.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1998, 39,
1099-1102.
(8) (a) Majetich, G. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7095-7129. (b) Feray, L.;
Kuznetsov, N.; Renaud, P. In Hydrogen Atom Abstraction; Renaud, P., Sibi,
M. P., Eds.; Radicals in Organic Synthesis, Vol. 2. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2001; pp 246-278. (c) Robertson, J.; Pillai, J.; Lush, R. K. Chem. Soc.
ReV. 2001, 30, 94-103.
(9) (a) Mart´ın, A.; Salazar, J. A.; Sua´rez, E. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61,
3999-4006. (b) Dorta, R. L.; Mart´ın, A.; Salazar, J. A.; Sua´rez, E.; Prange´,
T. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2251-2261.
(10) (a) Barton, D. H. R.; Sammes, P. G.; Taylor, M. V.; Werstiuk, E.
J. Chem. Soc. C 1970, 1977-1981. (b) Gonza´lez, A. G.; Freire, R.; Garc´ıa-
Estrada, M. G.; Salazar, J. A.; Sua´rez, E. Tetrahedron 1972, 28, 1289-
1297. (c) Gonza´lez, A. G.; Freire, R.; Garc´ıa-Estrada, M. G.; Salazar, J.
A.; Sua´rez, E. Anal. Chim. 1971, 67, 903-905.
(11) Oikawa, M.; Oikawa, H.; Ichihara, A. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 6237-
6254.
(12) For studies on the diastereoselective osmylation of a related olefin
see: refs 4b,c.
1296
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 8, 2002