Michael addition of arenethiols to R,â-unsaturated carbonyl
compounds has been reported to give excellent diastereo-
and enantioselectivity.9 An elegant enantioselective conden-
sation of configurationally labile R-thiobenzyllithium with
electrophile has recently been developed.10
A neighboring group participation could bypass the
trigonal planar carbenium ion intermediate and give rise to
stereocontrolled substitution products via a double SN2
process.11 In the case of â-amino alcohols, stereoselective
transformation via aziridinium and aziridine intermediates
is well documented.12 We report herein a diastereoselective
synthesis of amino sulfide and provide evidences for the
formation of an iminocarbonate intermediate by way of the
O-5 participation of the vicinal N-carbamate.13
While working on the hydrolysis of compound 3,14 we
found that treatment of its methanol solution with aqueous
HCl led to the stereoselective incorporation of the methoxy
function at the benzylic position (yield ) 40%, de ) 10/1).
Although the transformation itself can be understood on the
solvolysis basis, a process involving N-3 and/or O-5 par-
ticipation of the vicinal N-carbamate can also be advanced,
leading to a stereoselective process. This assumption together
with our interests in the synthesis of chiral amino sulfides
prompted us to examine the thiolation of amino diol 3 using
6-acetoxyhexanethiol (4) as a sterically nonbiased nucleo-
phile (Scheme 1). After a brief survey of reaction conditions,
of 3 and 4 (1.1 equiv relative to 3) at 0 °C for 10 min
provided the sulfide 5 in 95% yield after the reintroduction
of the N-Boc function. The concentration was found to be
an important factor that governs the diastereoseletivity of
this reaction. While a de of 6/1 in favor of the syn-
stereoisomer (vide infra) was obtained at 0.03 M, it decreased
to 3/1 when the reaction was performed at 0.3 M. These
results are indicative of the interplay between a simple
nucleophilic substitution and a double SN2 process via the
participation of the N-carbamate function. Even better
diastereoselectivity (10/1) was observed when the thiolation
was performed on diol 6 under otherwise identical conditions.
The reaction conditions developed were found to be quite
general, and various thiols including cysteine derivatives are
effective reaction partners (Figure 2). The relative stereo-
Scheme 1
Figure 2.
chemistry of 5 was determined to be syn by comparing the
coupling constant (J ) 8-10 Hz) with that of the starting
material as well as the related sulfide derived from pseudo-
ephedrine.15 This stereochemical assignment was further
corroborated by NMR analysis of thiomorpholinone (7)
obtained from 5c under classic conditions (i. TFA; ii. toluene,
2-hydroxypyridine). The benzylic proton resonanced at δ )
4.53 ppm with a coupling constant of 9.1 Hz clearly indicated
the trans-diequatorial orientation of the 1-aryl and the
2-hydroxymethyl groups and hence the syn-stereochemistry
of 5c. Thus, thiolation occurred with overall retention of
configuration at the benzylic position. The high diastereo-
selectivity observed made the SN1 process unlikely and is
in line with a double SN2 process via neighboring group
participation.
a i) toluene-TFA (v/v ) 1/1), 4, c ) 0.03 M 0 °C; ii) Boc2O,
NaHCO3, THF.
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was found to be the acid of choice.
Thus, simply stirring a toluene-TFA (v/v ) 1/1) solution
(6) Lohray, B. B.; Jayachandran, B.; Bhushan, V.; Nandanan, E.;
Ravindranathan, T. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5983-5985.
(7) (a) Allevi, P.; Anastasia, M.; Ciuffreda, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,
32, 6927-6930. (b) Yin, S. F.; Ma, W. Y.; Wang, T. D.; Chen, X. H.;
Zhang, C. N. Acta Pharm. Sin. 1993, 28, 668-672.
(8) (a) Corey, E. J.; Gin, D. Y.; Kania, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 9202-9203. (b) Zhou, B.; Guo, J.; Danishefsky, S. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 43-46.
(9) (a) Nishimura, K.; Tomioka, K. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 431-434
and references therein. (b) Diastereoselective intramolecular sulfur transfer,
see: Palomo, C.; Oiarbide, M.; Dias, F.; Ortiz, A.; Linden, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 5602-5603.
(10) Nakamura, S.; Nakagawa, R.; Watanabe, Y.; Toru, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 11340-11347.
(11) Capon, B. Q. ReV. 1964, 8, 45-111.
(12) For recent reviews, see: (a) Tanner, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1994, 33, 599-619. (b) Osborn, H. M. I.; Sweeney, J. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1693-1715. (c) Atkinson, R. A. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 1519-1559. (d) McCoull, W.; David, F. Synthesis 2000, 1347-1365.
(13) For nomenclature, see Winstein, S.; Allred, E.; Heck, R.; Glick, R.
Tetrahedron 1958, 3, 1-13. (b) Reference 10, p 45.
(14) Compound 3 was synthesized by a phenolic aldol condensation
between sesamol and Garner’s aldehyde followed by selective O-methy-
lation, see: Casiraghi, G.; Cornia, M.; Rassu, G. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
4919-4922.
(15) Poelert, M. A.; Hof, R. P.; Peper, N. C. M. W.; Kellog, R. M.
Heterocycles 1994, 37, 461-475.
1236
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 7, 2002