Organic Letters
Letter
reduces the efficiency of the overall process and reactions with
molecular hydrogen often depend on higher pressure
(≥15 atm) for catalytic turnover.17a,d,f−i
A screening was conducted in order to identify the most
suitable conditions for the selective formation of the
The influence of different solvents (Table S1) revealed that
DME combined the highest activity with good selectivity for
3a.
Curiously, efforts to combine the dehydrogenative coupling
with catalytic hydrogenation to a full BH cycle are scarce and
limited in scope to primary alcohols using a heterogeneous Ni
catalyst20 or the Ru-catalyzed synthesis of tetrahydronaphthyr-
idines.21 Tetrahydroquinolines have been prepared in an
intramolecular N-alkylation reaction via BH,22 but the
necessary amino alcohols have to be prepared in a multistep
reaction sequence.
Among the tested bases (Table 1, entries 1−5), KH led to
the highest selectivity for 3a. The application of 150 mol % of
KH is the best choice (Table 1, entry 7), while lower amounts
of base decrease the reactivity (Table 1, entries 5 and 6) and
higher amounts (Table 1, entry 8) hamper the selectivity of the
system for 3a. The concentration as well as the ratio between
reaction volume and headspace have an additional impact on
the success of the system (Table 1, entry 7 vs entry 10; Table
S3). A substrate concentration of 1.0 M and a 1:5 ratio
between volume of reaction mixture and headspace led to the
best results. Increasing the catalyst loading to 3.0 mol % only
led to a minor improvement in conversion (Table 1, entry 11),
whereas a reduction to 1.5 mol % impairs the outcome more
clearly (Table 1, entry 9). Attempts to increase the conversion
to 3a further by extending the reaction time had only a minor
A challenging problem is the suppression of the self-
condensation of 2-aminobenzyl alcohol,10b which led to the
formation of oligomeric products. In our case, the additional
application of KOH (30 mol %) and the order of addition
seem to be crucial to minimize this competing side reaction
(Table 1, entry 12 and Table S4). No conversion was observed
with Mn(CO)5Br in the absence of the pincer ligand (Table 1,
entry 13).
Herein, we disclose the direct synthesis of 1,2,3,4-
tetrahydroquinolines starting from 2-aminobenzyl alcohols
and secondary alcohols based on the BH strategy utilizing
the manganese PN3 pincer complex 1 (Scheme 1), which
exhibited high activity in the N-alkylation of amines with
alcohols when activated with KH as base.23,24
During our investigations, we observed that the reaction
temperature and the applied base influence the outcome of the
reaction of 2-aminobenzyl alcohol with 1-phenylethanol
drastically. The usage of KOtBu at 140 °C leads to the
selective formation of the corresponding 2-phenylquinoline
(2a) (Table 1, entry 3), with significantly lower catalyst and
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for the
Synthesis of 2-Phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline (3a)
a
b
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the
selectivity of the catalytic system for a broader range of
substrates was explored (Table 2). We started our inves-
tigations by applying different aromatic secondary alcohols.
Generally good yields were obtained.25−27 The catalytic system
tolerates an alcohol containing a ferrocene moiety (3c), though
a higher catalyst loading (5 mol %) was required when an
additional nitrogen atom was present in order to obtain a
decent yield (3d). A significant decrease in yield was observed
when higher substituted alcohols were applied (3e−3g).
Aliphatic alcohols provided moderate to good conversions in
general, providing a facile and atom-efficient access to
norangustureine (3k), a precursor of the important Hancock
alkaloid ( )-angustureine.28 For products 3i−3k, the corre-
sponding regioisomers were detected as minor products in
diminishing amounts with increasing chain length. A higher
catalyst loading was required for the sterically more demanding
aliphatic alcohol 3-methylbutan-2-ol to obtain a satisfactory
yield of 3l. Small amounts of 2-(tert-butyl)quinoline (2m)
were observed as the only product for the bulkier 3,3-
dimethylbutan-2-ol and no conversion to the corresponding
tetrahydroquinoline 3m was observed. An additional methyl
group at the 2-aminobenzyl alcohol was well tolerated, which is
reflected by the good yields of 3o−3r. Even the electron-rich
heterocylic (3-aminopyridin-4-yl)methanol readily reacted
with 1-phenylethanol, yielding the corresponding 1,2,3,4-
tetrahydro-1,7-naphthyridine 3s in moderate yield. The
conversion of 2-aminobenzhydrol to 3t and 3u was low,
though the dehydrogenative quinoline products were observed
as byproducts in relatively large amounts.
base
conversion (%)
amt
cat. loading
(mol %)
no.
type
(equiv)
2a
3a
Σ
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KOH
1.00
1.00
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50, 0.30
1.50, 0.30
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
2.0
57
40
98
35
18
18
15
44
5
10
13
12
<1
2
10
<1
8
46
56
59
36
50
65
67
84
<1
59
50
98
43
64
74
74
80
55
75
80
96
<1
c
KOtBu
KOtBu
NaH
ce
,
c
c
KH
c
KH
c
KH
c
KH
d
KH
d
10 KH
11 KH
12 KH + KOH
13 KH + KOH
d
d
d
f
2.0
a
Reaction conditions: 0.275 mmol of 2-aminobenzyl alcohol,
0.250 mmol of 1-phenylethanol, stock solution of 1 in DME (0.005
mmol), closed system, Ar. GC conversion referenced to p-xylene.
Concentration: 0.3 M, ratio volume reaction mixture/headspace =
b
c
d
1:2. Concentration: 1.0 M, ratio volume reaction mixture/headspace
e
f
= 1:5. At 140 °C. Cat. = 2 mol % Mn(CO)5Br. Note: Using KH as
base led to traces of 1-phenylethanol self-condensation products
(<5%).
base loadings in comparison to previous manganese-based
catalyst systems.12 However, catalyst 1 produces preferentially
the reduced form (2-phenyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline, 3a)
when a combination of bases, KH and KOH, is employed at
120 °C. As the synthesis of quinolines via dehydrogenative
coupling has already been reported with various catalytic
systems,9−16 we decided to focus on the undeveloped
formation of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines 3.
In order to prove the feasibility of the catalyst system, the
benchmark reaction of 2-aminobenzyl alcohol with 1-phenyl-
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX