involve functionalization at the 2- and/or 5-positions of
pyrroles due to the inherent reactivity of these sites. In
marked contrast, very little work has addressed the C-H
functionalization of 2,5-disubstituted pyrroles.8c,9b,11-13 Most
relevant to the current studies, Doucet and Santelli have
reported the Pd(OAc)2-catalyzed 3-arylation of several 1,2,5-
trisubstituted pyrroles with aryl bromides (Scheme 2).12
ined Pd(OAc)2 as the catalyst in AcOH at room temperature,
since these were effective conditions for the C2-arylation of
1-methylpyrrole.14 Gratifyingly, traces (3%) of the desired
product 1 were obtained (Table 1, entry 1). A screen of other
Table 1. Optimization of the Pd-Catalyzed C-H Phenylation of
a
1,2-Dimethyl-5-Phenylpyrrole with Ph2IBF4
Scheme 2. Previous Example of C3 Arylation of Pyrroles
entry
[Pd]
solvent
temp (°C)
yieldb
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pd(OAc)2
AcOH
AcOH
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
25c
25c
25c
40c
60d
80e
3%
7%
11%
42%
60%
84%
(MeCN)2PdCl2
(MeCN)2PdCl2
(MeCN)2PdCl2
(MeCN)2PdCl2
(MeCN)2PdCl2
While this was an important advance, the reaction suffers
from several key limitations, including (i) a modest scope
of pyrrole substrates, (ii) the requirement for electron-
deficient aryl bromides, (iii) high reaction temperatures (130
°C), and (iv) moderate yields (typically <65%).
a 1 equiv (0.5 mmol) of pyrrole, 1 equiv (0.5 mmol) of Ph2IBF4, 2.5
mL of solvent, 2.5 mol % of [Pd]. b Isolated yields (average of two or three
runs). c 15 h. d 5 h. e 2 h.
Previous studies from our group have shown that PdII
catalysts promote the 2-arylation of indoles and pyrroles with
diaryliodonium salts.14,15 These reactions proceed with high
functional group tolerance and under extremely mild condi-
tions (typically at room temperature). In contrast, most other
Pd-catalyzed indole/pyrrole arylation methods require tem-
peratures in excess of 100 °C.16 On the basis of our prior
work, we hypothesized that the combination of a PdII catalyst
and Ar2IBF4 might also promote the C-H arylation of 2,5-
substituted pyrrole derivatives. We report herein that this is
an effective strategy for the synthesis of tri-, tetra-, and even
penta-substituted pyrrole products.
17
PdII catalysts revealed that (MeCN)2PdCl2 provided a
significantly higher yield (7%, entry 2). Moving from AcOH
to DCE as the solvent and increasing the reaction temperature
from 25 to 84 °C further enhanced the yield to 84% (entry
6). Notably, the optimal conditions (2.5 mol % of [Pd], 84
°C, 2 h in DCE) are mild compared to most other Pd-
catalyzed pyrrole arylation reactions reported in the litera-
ture.6,7,12,13 In addition, this transformation was highly site
selective, providing 1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenylpyrrole as the
only regioisomer detected by GC and GCMS analysis.
As shown in Table 2, a variety of 1,2-dimethyl-5-aryl
pyrrole derivatives were effective substrates for this trans-
formation.18 Electron-withdrawing and -donating substituents
as well as ortho-substitution on the aryl ring were all well-
tolerated (Table 2, entries 2-6). With all of these substrates,
excellent (>50:1) selectivity was observed for C-H func-
tionalization adjacent to the CH3 substituent. The only case
in which another isomer was even detected was with the
electron-rich p-MeOC6H4-substituted pyrrole (entry 2). Prod-
uct 2 was formed along with traces (∼0.3%) of a minor
isomer. Interestingly, 2-methyl-5-phenylpyrrole also showed
modest reactivity to form 7 under these conditions (entry
7).
Our initial investigations focused on the phenylation of
1,2-dimethyl-5-phenylpyrrole with Ph2IBF4. We first exam-
(8) For examples of pyrrole C-H olefination, see: (a) Beck, E. M.;
Grimster, N. P.; Hatley, R.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
2528. (b) Beck, E. M.; Hatley, R.; Gaunt, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 3004. (c) Garcia-Rubia, A.; Urones, B.; Arrayas, R. G.; Carretero,
J. C. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 9676
.
(9) For examples of pyrrole C-H alkynylation, see: (a) Trofimov, B. A.;
Sobenina, L. N.; Stepanova, Z. V.; Vakul’skaya, T. I.; Kazheva, O. N.;
Alexsandrov, G. G.; Dyachenko, O. A.; Mikhaleva, A. I. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 5541. (b) Brand, J. P.; Charpentier, J.; Waser, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 9346
.
(10) For examples of pyrrole C-H borylation, see: (a) Tse, M. K.; Cho,
J. Y.; Smith, M. R., III. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2831. (b) Takagi, J.; Sato, K.;
Hartwig, J. F.; Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5649.
(c) Ishiyama, T.; Takagi, J.; Yonekawa, Y.; Hartwig, J. F.; Miyaura, N.
AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 1103. (d) Harrisson, P.; Morris, J.; Marder,
T. B.; Steel, P. G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3586. (e) Kallepalli, V. A.; Shi, F.;
Paul, S.; Onyeozili, E. N., Jr.; Smith, M. R., III. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
9199. (f) Mkhalid, I. A. I.; Barnard, J. H.; Marder, T. B.; Murphy, J. M.;
2,5-Methyl/alkyl substituted pyrroles also underwent ef-
ficient C-H arylation with diphenyliodonium tetrafluorobo-
rate (Table 2, entries 8-11). In all cases examined, arylation
adjacent to the CH3 substituent was favored. The selectivity
was modest (2.0:1) with R1 ) ethyl but was very good (29:
1) with R1 ) cyclohexyl (entries 9 and 10, respectively).
Hartwig, J. F. Chem. ReV. 2010, 110, 890
.
(11) Ban, I.; Sudo, T.; Taniguchi, T.; Itami, K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
3607
.
(12) Fall, Y.; Doucet, H.; Santelli, M. ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 153
(13) Roger, J.; Gottumukkala, A. L.; Doucet, H. ChemCatChem 2010,
2, 20
.
(17) Abrunhosa, I.; Delain-Bioton, L.; Gaumont, A. C.; Gulea, M.;
Masson, S. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9263.
.
(14) Deprez, N. R.; Kalyani, D.; Krause, A.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem.
(18) Pyrrole substrates were prepared according to the following: (a)
Biava, M.; Porretta, G. C.; Poce, G.; De Logu, A.; Meleddu, R.; De Rossi,
E.; Manetti, F.; Botta, M. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 4734. (b) De, S.
Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 803.
Soc. 2006, 128, 4972
.
(15) Merritt, E. A.; Olofsson, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9052
.
(16) Bandini, M.; Eichholzer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9608.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011
289