Aza-nido-dodecaboranes and -borates from Aza-closo-dodecaboranes
Table 3 Amounts of starting materials 1 and base and yields of
adducts 1·base of the neutral type 1·L or the anionic type [cat-
ion][1X]
1
mmol base
mmola) 1·base
yield
b)
1a
"
"
"
"
1b
"
"
1c
1d
"
1e
1f
1g
0.69
1.00
1.00
1.38
1.70
0.68
0.32
0.59
0.50
0.56
0.70
0.27
0.23
0.20
NHEt2
0.68
10.1
1.05
1.37
1a·NHEt2
[NH3Bu][1a(NHBu)]
1a·NH2tBu
NH2Bu
NH2tBu
py
b)
b)
collocation [9]. We assume that the type 2 isomers are gene-
rally formed from the aza-closo-dodecaboranes by a
[3c,1c]-collocation.
Summarizing, the results show that Fig. 2 represents the
most plausible mechanism for the opening of aza-closo-do-
decaboranes by Lewis bases.
1a·py
Na[FeCp(CO)2] 1.70
Na{[1a[FeCp(CO)2]}
[NEt4][1bBr]
[N(PPh3)2][1b(N3)]
[NH3tBu][1b(NHtBu)]
1c·NEt3
1d·NEt3
Li[1dMe]
1e·NEt3
H[1f(OH)]
1g·NH2tBu
74
57
78
83
46
67
88
[NEt4]Br
[N(PPh3)2]N3
NH2tBu
NEt3
0.70
0.32
9.5
0.72
0.72
0.64c)
0.72
ca.1d)
0.20
"
LiMe
NEt3
H2O
NH2tBu
65
b)
Experimental
60
a) Amount of amines measured by a calibrated micro-syringe. b) Yield quanti-
tative, according to the NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture. c) 0.40 ml
1.6 M solution in Et2O. d) 1 ml aqueous MeOD.
NMR spectra: Varian UNITY 500; 499.83, 160.36, 125.70,
470.27 MHz for 1H, 11B, 13C, 19F, respectively. We used external
standards for 11B (BF3(OEt2)) and 19F (CFCl3); residual protons
and 13C atoms of the deuterated solvents acted as standards for
1H and 13C, respectively, converted finally into the common tms
standard. CD2Cl2 was the solvent, but [D8]thf was used for 1a,
1a·py, 1a·NH2tBu, Li[1dMe], and Na{1a [FeCp(CO)2]} and a di-
luted solution of H2O in MeOD for H[1f(OH)]. COSY 45 was ap-
plied for pulse recurrence in 2D-11B/11B NMR spectra; cluster-exo-
H atoms were assigned with the aid of 2D-1H/11B HMQC. 11B
and then stirred for 12 h. The adducts were isolated by removing
Ϫ
all volatile materials in vacuo; in the case of N3 as the base, the
product precipitated by adding hexane to the reaction mixture. No
purification took place with NHBuϪ and the ferrate as the bases;
the solid red ferrate product was pure with respect to the NMR
spectra and was present in a 2:3 ratio of the type 3 and 7 isomers;
this ratio changed in favour of the type 7 isomer on standing in thf
solution. The adducts of 1c؊e with NEt3 and Li[1dMe] were iso-
lated as viscous colourless oils; impurities could be extracted by
digesting with hexane or (in the case of Li[1dMe]) Et2O. Extraction
with hexane was also applied to the colourless solids with BrϪ and
1
NMR peaks are listed in Table 1, H NMR peaks in Table 2.
7,8,9,10,11-Pentamethyl-1-phenyl-12-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)aza-
closo-dodecaborane: A mixture of 1-phenylaza-closo-dodecaborane
(1b) [4] (380 mg, 1.72 mol), methyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (me-
thyl triflate) (2.1 ml), and trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (0.6 ml)
was heated to 140 °C for 20 h. Excess triflate and triflic acid were
removed in vacuo. The black residue was extracted with three por-
tions of hexane (5 ml). Colourless product (420 mg, 56 %) was ob-
tained from the hexane solution, after removal of hexane, by subli-
mation (80 °C/0.001 mbar). Recrystallization from hexane was pos-
sible at Ϫ40 °C. C12H25B11F3NO3S (439.3), found (calcd.): C 32.58
(32.81), H 6.45 (5.74), N 3.03 (3.19).
Ϫ
N3 as the bases. A recrystallisation from CH2Cl2 could be achie-
ved with the salts containing the anions [1bBr]Ϫ and [1b(NHtBu)]Ϫ
and with 1g·NH2tBu. Amounts of the starting materials and yields
of the purified products are listed in Table 3.
1H NMR: δ ϭ 0.55 (s, 15 H, Me), 2.37 (H2ϪH6), 6.55Ϫ6.84 (5H, Ph). Ϫ
11B NMR: δ ϭ Ϫ8.8 (d, J ϭ 165 Hz, B2ϪB6), Ϫ4.2 (s, B7ϪB11), 16.8 (s,
B12). Ϫ 13C NMR: δ ϭ Ϫ4.1 (Me), 119.2 (q, 1J ϭ 314 Hz, CF3) 123.1,
127.9, 129.1, 145.1 (Ph). Ϫ 19F NMR: δ ϭ Ϫ77.4.
Crystal structure of 8-(diethylammonio)-1-methyl-1-aza-nido-dode-
caborane: Data were collected on an ENRAF-Nonius CAD4 dif-
fractometer, using MoKα radiation (λ ϭ 154.184 pm, graphite mo-
nochromator) at 228 K. Space group P21/c (Nr. 14); a ϭ 755.9(2),
b ϭ 1371.6(4), c ϭ 1449.9(3) pm; β ϭ 94.31(2)°; V ϭ 1.4991(6) nm3;
General procedure of the adduct formation: The closo-clusters of
type 1 were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 ml); other solvents were used,
however, before the salt Na[FeCp(CO)2] (thf, 2 ml) and the bases
NH2tBu and py (both 1:1; [D8]thf, 3 ml), LiMe (Et2O, 5 ml) were
added, and aqueous MeOD was added to undissolved 1f. The solu-
tions were cooled down to Ϫ50 °C, but were cooled down to
Ϫ78 °C, when LiMe was added to 1d and NEt3 to 1c؊e; MeOD
was added to 1f at room temperature. The amines or salts (in the
case of anionic bases) were added undissolved, except the sodium
ferrate (thf, 5 ml) and LiMe (1.6 molar solution in Et2O). In the
case of the 1:1 reaction of 1a with amines, the adducts were not
isolated from the reaction mixture; NMR samples were taken from
the reaction flask at Ϫ50 °C and measured at different temperatu-
res, as indicated above; crystals of 1a·NHEt2 grew in the flask at
Ϫ40 °C and were isolated for the X-ray structural investigation as
usual. The reaction mixture from 1f and aqueous MeOD was im-
mediately treated by NMR methods. In all of the other cases, the
reaction mixture was brought to room temperature within 30 min
Z
ϭ
4; calculated density 1.029 g cmϪ3
0.60·0.60·0.60 mm3; 3.18 cmϪ1
sec. extinction coeff.
;
crystal size
µ
ϭ
;
0.696·10Ϫ6; range of Θ: 5Ϫ70°. The structure was solved by direct
methods and refined on reflection intensities [10]. Measured reflec-
tions: 4337; observed independent reflns. (I Ͼ σ(I)): 2417; refined
parameters: 264; R ϭ 0.048; Rw ϭ 0.057 (wϪ1 ϭ σ2(Fo)); GOF ϭ
1.657; max. residual electron density: 0.2 e AϪ3. The crystallo-
˚
graphic data have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallo-
graphic Data Centre as supplementary publication No. CCDC 169
169. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on applica-
tion to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1 EZ UK (e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
Acknowledgement: We are grateful to Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft and to Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for the support of
this work.
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2002, 628, 632Ϫ640
639