applying our methodology toward the synthesis of C-
glycosides and C-glycopeptides. This field is currently
expanding with a number of C-linked glycopeptide libraries
appearing in the recent literature.7-9 The choice of linker
was governed by our desire to lessen the reactivity differential
between primary, secondary, and tertiary carbon-centered
radical additions while also developing a generic method for
the synthesis of certain classes of C-linked glycopeptides.
Others have shown how Wang acrylate can be utilized as
an acceptor in radical additions.3 However, it is interesting
to note that these additions were not reported using tributyltin
hydride and AIBN (although Enholm et al. have reported
free-radical allyl transfers using allyl tributyltin on soluble
non-cross-linked resins4). Others have reported difficulties
when using the more conventional conditions with activated
acceptors on solid supports.10 There are also problems
associated with using Wang acrylate when the addition does
not proceed to completion since acrylic acid is not released
cleanly from the resin under conditions required for product
cleavage.
We decided to use the tetrafluorophenol linker 3 to address
these problems for a variety of reasons. First, the acrylate
acceptor is expected to have enhanced activity over a
conventional acrylate ester due to the strong electron-
withdrawing effects of the fluoro-aromatic moiety. Second,
we anticipate that the release of products into solution by a
range of nucleophiles would provide an extra point of product
diversity and can be exploited in a combinatorial library as
shown recently.11 The corollary of this is that an array of
saturated amides can be synthesized by radical addition and
subsequent nucleophilic amine cleavage. Finally, since the
cleavage reaction is responsible for introducing the product
diversity essential for library generation, the radical addition
need only be carried out upon a single acceptor, reducing
the requirement for method development.
Loading for the phenol was assessed by acetylation (excess
acetic anhydride/Et3N, DCM, 16 h) and cleavage (4-methyl-
benzylamine, 2 equiv, DCM, 16 h); subsequent loadings and
yields quoted are based on this calculation. Formation of
acrylate ester 3 was carried out in DMF by sequential
addition of acrylic acid, DMAP, and DIC.
We began by examining the addition of simple alkyl
radicals to acceptor 3 (Scheme 1, Table 1).
Table 1
entry
R-X
R-NH2
product yield %a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
t-butyl iodide
n-butyl iodide
isopropyl iodide
cyclohexyl iodide
phenethyl iodide
4-Me-BnNH2
4-Me-BnNH2
4-Me-BnNH2
4-Me-BnNH2
4-Me-BnNH2
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4gb
4h b
4ib
4jb
4k b
4lb
98
79
99
78
68
68
53
44
57
21
16
37
cyclopentyl iodide 4-Me-BnNH2
5
5
5
5
5
6
4-Me-BnNH2
PheOEt
TrpOMe
TyrOMe
SerOMe
PheOEt
10
11
12
a Isolated yields. b Column chromatography was required for analytical
purity.
These reactions proceeded smoothly on resin with yields
as quoted in Table 1 based on the loading of 3. In the case
of entries 1-6, product purification was limited to removal
of excess amine either by washing the organic phase with 2
M HCl or filtration of the solution through an SCX solid-
phase extraction cartridge. These results demonstrate the
reactivity of acrylate acceptor 3 as well as the advantages
of the solid-phase approach, with good to excellent yields
reported for tertiary, secondary, and primary radicals (4a-
f).12
The next stage of our research saw the application of this
technology to the synthesis of C-linked glycosides. Radical
addition of 6-iodo-1,2:3,4-O-diisopropylidene-R-l-fucopy-
ranose 5 to acceptor 3 followed by cleavage with a selection
of amines, including amino acid derivatives, afforded
products 4g-l in moderate yields as shown in Scheme 2
and Table 1 (entries 7-12).
Since we began this work, synthesis of the tetrafluorophe-
nol linker 2 has been reported11 and some of our methodology
has been adapted accordingly. Aminomethyl-polystyrene
resin 1 was coupled to 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-hydroxy-benzoic
acid under standard conditions as shown below (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1a
The synthesis of C-linked glycosides via solid-phase
radical methodology has not, to our knowledge, been
(7) Arya, P.; Kutterer, K. M. K.; Barkley, A. J. Comb. Chem. 2000, 2,
120-126.
(8) Eniade, A.; Murphy, A. V.; Landreau, G.; Ben, R. N. Bioconjugate
Chem. 2001, 12, 817-823.
(9) Peri, F.; Cipolla, L.; Rescigno, M.; La Ferla, B.; Nicotra, F.
Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 325-328.
(10) Yim, A.-M.; Vidal, Y.; Viallefont, P.; Martinez, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 4535.
(11) Salvino, J. M.; Kumar, N. V.; Orton, E.; Airey, J.; Kiesow, T.;
Crawford, K.; Mathew, R.; Krolikowski, P.; Drew, M.; Engers, D.;
Krolikowski, D.; Herpin, T.; Gardyan, M.; McGeehan, G.; Labaudiniere,
R. J. Comb. Chem. 2000, 691-697.
(12) For a discussion on the effects of substituents on the rates and yields
of tin-mediated radical additions to various electron-deficient alkenes, see:
Giese, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 753-764; 1985, 24, 553-
565.
a Reaction conditions: (a) 3.5 equiv of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-
hydroxy-benzoic acid, 3.5 equiv of EDC, 7 equiv of DIPEA, DCM,
16 h; repeat using 2/3 of the amount of (b) 5 equiv of acrylic acid,
5 equiv of DIC, 0.2 equiv of DMAP, DMF; (c) 5 equiv of RI, 5
equiv of Bu3SnH, 1 equiv of AIBN, toluene, 100 °C, 1.5 h; (d) 3
equiv of R′NH2, DCM, 16 h.
1776
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 10, 2002