C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Two-photon fluorescence excitation spectra of 1 and 1-Np have
the same shape as shown in Figure 3, in accord with the one-photon
spectra. 1 showed a peak δ value of 165 GM (1 GM ) 10-50 cm4
s photon-1). The nanoparticles showed a huge per-particle δ value
of 2.7 × 105 GM and an ηδ of 0.9 × 105 GM. The value for the
1-Np is consistent with a linearly additive contribution from the
roughly 2500 chromophores and no significant enhancement
induced by the nanoparticle.21
The two-photon action cross section (ηδ) of the 1-coated
nanoparticle is one of the highest ever reported10b,12,22 and dem-
onstrates the utility of using the particles as a tool for concentrating
chromophores. The optical properties coupled with polyfunction-
alization to provide water solubility may allow for applications in
biological imaging. We believe that the use of nanoparticles as a
carrier for large numbers of chromophores is promising and may
have an impact on ultrasensitive detection.
Figure 2. Absorption (solid line) and fluorescence (dashed line) spectra
of 1 (red) and of 1-Np (black) in 1,2-dichlorobenzene.
Acknowledgment. Support of this work by NSF (BES-0086944
and CHE-0107105), AFOSR (F49620-02-1-0358), and NIH
(5R01RR14312-02) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Stephanie
J. K. Pond for technical assistance. T.M.-F. thanks DFG for financial
support.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis, infrared, and optical
spectra of 1 and of 1-Np (mixed- and mono-ligand) (PDF). This material
References
(1) Klein, D. L.; Roth, R.; Lim, A. K. L.; Alivisatos, A. P.; McEuen, P. L.
Nature 1997, 389, 699-701.
Figure 3. Two-photon absorption spectra of 1 (red, abscissa on the left)
and of 1-Np (black, abscissa on the right) in 1,2-dichlorobenzene. Inset:
TEM image and electron diffraction pattern of 1-Np. Scale bar 66 nm.
(2) Taton, T. A.; Lu, G.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5164-
5165.
(3) Shipway, A. N.; Katz, E.; Willner, I. ChemPhysChem 2000, 1, 18-52.
(4) Brust, M.; Walker, M.; Bethell, D.; Schiffrin, D. J.; Whyman, R. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 801-802.
1330 cm-1) on going from the free ligand 1 in chloroform solution
to crystallites of 1 in KBr pellets. The band frequencies for the
O-D/1-Np and the 1-Np (both nanoparticle samples in KBr pellets)
were intermediate to those for the ligand in the solution and solid
state, see Supporting Information. These results suggest that the
environment of the chromophores on the nanoparticles is intermedi-
ate to the solution and solid state of the unbound chromophore.
Electrochemical measurements indicated that there was no change
in reduction potential on going from the free dye to the dye bound
to the nanoparticle (both in solution), ruling out a significant
electronic coupling of the ligand molecular orbitals and the metal
electron levels.
(5) Terrill, R. H.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12537-12548.
(6) Templeton, A. C.; Wuelfing, M. P.; Murray, R. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000,
33, 27-36.
(7) Williams, R. M.; Zipfel, W. R.; Webb, W. W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2001, 5, 603-608.
(8) (a) Cumpston, B. H.; et al. Nature 1999, 398, 51-54. (b) Stellacci, F.; et
al. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 194-198.
(9) Bhawalkar, J. D.; He, G. S.; Prasad, P. N. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1996, 59,
1041-1070.
(10) (a) Grayson, S. K.; Frechet, J. M. J. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3819-3867.
(b) Drobizhev, M.; Karotki, A.; Rebane, A.; Spangler, C. W. Opt. Lett.
2001, 26, 1081-1083.
(11) Kang, S. Y.; Kim, K. Langmuir 1998, 14, 226-230.
(12) Albota, M.; et al. Science 1998, 281, 1653-1656.
(13) Imahori, H.; Fukuzumi, S. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 1197-1199.
(14) (a) Hu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1464-1470. (b) Ingram, R. S.;
Hostetler, M. J.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9175-
9178.
The absorption and fluorescence spectra of the 1-Np in solution
are nearly identical to those of free 1 (Figure 2).19 Little difference
was observed in the fluorescence quantum yield of the free dye (η
) 0.47) and the dye-coated mono- or mixed-ligand nanoparticles
(η ) 0.33) in solution, consistent with the small spectral overlap
of the dye fluorescence and the nanoparticle absorption. The same
trend was observed for the fluorescence lifetime (2.13 ns vs 1.85
ns).20 The optical spectroscopy indicates that there is little interaction
between the bound chromophores for the nanoparticles in solution,
in contrast to the IR evidence for the nanoparticles dispersed in
the solid. These results suggest that a large degree of disorder in
the arrangement of the chromophores is induced by the high
temperature used to solvate the nanoparticles.
(15) Aguila, A.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5949-5954.
(16) Gittins, D. I.; Caruso, F. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 110-113.
(17) (a) Badia, A. et al. Chem.-Eur. J. 1996, 2, 359-363. (b) Sandhyarani,
N.; et al. Phys. ReV. B 2000, 62, R739-R742.
(18) Bauer, C. A.; Stellacci, F.; Marder, S. R.; Perry, J. W., manuscript in
preparation.
(19) This is due to the large number of chromophores on the nanoparticle,
which dominate the absorption relative to the core. For O-D/1-Np, the
absorption of both the chromophore and the metal core was observed.
(20) Lakowicz, J. R. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 298, 1-24. These small changes
are associated with changes in both the radiative and the nonradiative
rates when the dye is bound to the nanoparticle [see also refs 14, 15a].
(21) Wenseleers, W.; et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 6853-6863.
(22) (a) Najechalski, P.; Morel, Y.; Stephan, O.; Baldeck, P. Chem. Phys. Lett.
2001, 343, 44-48. (b) van Oijen, A. M.; et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79,
830-832.
JA0281277
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 2, 2003 329