10 000 times higher than that of CC-1065 against KB human
cancer cells.16 Studies also have shown that some synthetic
compounds, which contain two CPI moieties linked from
two positions by a flexible methylene chain of variable
length, are significantly more potent than CC-1065 both in
vitro and in vivo.18
Prevously we reported the synthesis and biological evalu-
ation of seco-CBI dimers against nine types of cancer cells.
Certain examples showed significant activity against CCRT-
CEM, HL-60 (TB), MOLT-4, leukemia, CNS cancer,
melanoma, and prostate cancer cell lines with Gl50 values
<0.01 µm.19
To our knowledge no attempt has been made to synthesize
bis 1-chloromethyl-5-hydroxy-1,2-dihydro-3H-benz[e]indole
(seco-CBI)-pyrrole polyamide conjugates 13, 17 (bis seco-
CBI pyrrole polyamide dimers). To investigate the structure-
activity relationship systematically, we have designed and
synthesized bis seco-CBI pyrrole polyamide dimers, which
contain two racemic CBI moieties linked from two different
positions with pyrrole polyamide by a flexible methylene
chain of variable length.
Figure 1.
doxorubicin, 80 times more potent than actinomycin D, and
about twice as potent as maytansine against L1210 leukemia
cells in vitro. Despite its high potency CC-1065 cannot be
used in humans because it was found that it caused delayed
death in the experimental animals. Because of the unique
structure and properties of these natural products, many
chemists were stimulated to synthesize derivatives and
analogues of CC-1065 and duocarmycins with better anti-
tumor selectivity and DNA-sequence-specific binding prop-
erties,13 in an attempt to avoid the undesired side effects while
retaining potency against tumor cells.13 As a successful
example of modification of 1,2,8,8a-tetrahydro-7-methyl
cyclopropa[c]pyrrolo[3,2-e]indole-4-one (CPI), the DNA
alkylating moiety of CC-1065, Boger first reported that the
simplified moiety, 1,2,9,9a-tetrahydrocyclo-propa[c]benzo-
[e]indole-4-one (CBI) and its analogues were more stable
and more potent than the CPI counterparts.14
In our previous work the seco-CBI moiety was synthesized
by using the following convenient route in good yield.
Deprotonation of carbamate 1,17 using NaH, followed by
alkylation of the resulting anion with 1,3-dichloropropene
in the presence of phase transfer catalyst Bu4NI gave an
mixture of Z and E isomers of vinyl chloride 2. Selective
reduction of the nitro group of 2 using hydrazine provided
amine 3, the desired precursor for the intramolecular aryl
radical cyclization on to a tethered vinyl chloride. A
deoxygenated solution of 3 in dry benzene was heated at
reflux for 15 h in the presence of 2 equiv of Bu3SnH and a
catalytic amount of AIBN to give the bifunctionalized seco-
CBI prodrug 4. To deactivate the amine group at the C7
position by reaction with acetyl chloride almost quantitatively
to afford its acetyl derivative 5 (Scheme 1).
In addition, studies on netropsin, distamycin, and related
compounds have led to the concept of polyamides as
information reading agents.15 A predominantly 4-5 AT base
pair sequence is recognized by netropsin and distamycin in
the minor groove of DNA. In our group attempts have been
made to link CPI16 and CBI17 with polyamides, which are
well-established DNA minor groove binders, to improve their
pharmacological properties and potencies. We found that
certain CPI-polyamide conjugates exhibit potency up to
Scheme 1a
(13) (a) Boger, D. L.; Colemon, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
4796. (b) Lin, C. H.; Sun, D.; Hurley, L. H. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1991, 4,
21.
(14) (a) Boger, D. L.; Ishizaki, T.; Wysocki, R. J.; Munk, S. A.; Kitos,
P. A.; Suntornwat, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6461. (b) Boger, D.
L.; Ishizaki, T. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5823. (c) Aristoff, P. A.; Johnson,
P. D. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 6234.
(15) (a) Lown, J. W. Synthesis of Sequence-specific Agents: Lexitrop-
sins. In Molecular Aspects of Anticancer Drug-DNA Interactions; Neidle,
S., Waring, M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1993; Vol. 1, p 322.
(b) Dervan, P. B. Science 1986, 232, 464. (c) Trauger, J. W.; Baird, E. E.;
Dervan, P. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1421. (d) Mrksich, M.;
Parks, M. E.; Dervan, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7983.
(16) (a) Fregeau, N. L.; Wang, Y.; Pon, R. T.; Wylie, W. A.; Lown, J.
W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8917. (b) Iida, H.; Lown, J. W. Recent
Res. DeV. Synth. Org. Chem. 1998, 1, 17.
a (i) NaH; (ii) ClCHdCHCH2Cl, Bu4NI; (iii) hydrazine hydrate,
FeCl3, C; (iv) Bu3SnH, AIBN; (v) CH3COCl, DIEA.
(17) (a) Jia, G.; Iida, H.; Lown, J. W. Hetrocycl. Commun. 1998, 4, 557.
(b) Jia, G.; Iida, H.; Lown, J. W. Chem. Commun. 1999, 119. (c) Jia, G.;
Iida, H.; Lown, J. W. Synth. Lett. 2000, 5, 603.
Treatment of the seco-CBI 4 with 1.0 equiv succinic
anhydride in the presence of triethylamine in dry THF at
1852
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 11, 2002