dynamically request firewall services or carriers already understand the dynamics monopolistic control is less likely.
different levels of security based on the of this explosion in demand, as evidenced
network connection. Moreover, the way by their ability to characterize demand
an application enters or exits the network and the huge investments that they are
can be selected in the same manner that making in their core networks. However,
different levels of service can be requested the unpredictability will not be in the
The critical juncture that major carriers
are facing is now understandable. Based
on the opening up of the local market in
the US, it is becoming more and more dif-
ficult to delay the deployment of competi-
tive access technology. An alternative is to
provision a commodity-like access service
and expand through the acquisition of
other local players, expanding into the
long-distance market and reinforcing
their position in wireless as well. These
choices have merits, but what major carri-
ers really need to do is focus on creating
demand in their networks versus competi-
tive networks by providing enhanced ser-
vices and new applications. They can
remain competitive only by deploying an
infrastructure technology that supports
an open service creation capability, allow-
ing users to drive the network.
from Federal Express.
core, but where the core touches the ac-
cess network, namely the edge of the net-
work. This edge is where most bandwidth
decisions will be made, including where
and how users enter and exit networks.
The core itself is a reservoir of bandwidth
while the real network intelligence lies at
its edge.
Previously, it was easy for the local in-
cumbent, as the only supplier of access
technology, to control the services avail-
able to the user. Unfortunately, in parts of
the world where deregulation has not yet
occurred, this situation will continue.
However, in the new telecommunications
environment, there is new competition
from wireless and cable companies as well
as new service providers who now have ac-
cess to the copper plant, so the possibly for
As more applications become available
across the network rather than residing
on the desktop, service differentiation be-
comes paramount. Indeed, a vast range of
applications is now beginning to appear.
The ability to discriminate among individ-
uals and applications will drive a new gen-
eration of technology to be deployed
within networks. Today’s WAN is more or
less a commodity; i.e., a supply of informa-
tion pipelines. The next-generation net-
work will have to reach a new level of
sophistication.
Today’s WANs are essentially planned
environments that manage demand ac-
cording to the constraints of the network
infrastructure and the tariffing structure.
In many respects, these networks were
simple to plan because they could be
mapped to areas of greatest demand and
between areas of the most communica-
tion. They are similar in many ways to the
mainframe model. However, these net-
works are now becoming distorted as a re-
sult of the PC and the Internet. Now it is
difficult to predict where demand will oc-
cur in the WAN environment, so the natu-
ral tendency is to overprovision the
network.
Hubert Whyte is president and CEO of
net.com, located in Fremont, California.
CD■
Remarkably, overprovisioning is exactly
what is happening in North America and
Europe with respect to the core and in
some metropolitan WANs. Investment by
next-generation carriers and someincum-
bents is at an all-time high as they pave
their way to accommodate the increased
demand that they hope will materialize.
Much of this investment is specifically in
optical technology, which will put in place
an unlimited amount of bandwidth, form-
ing the basic plumbing of the network.
Of course, moving from a predictable
environment where demand is controlled
to an unpredictable one with little con-
trol will be a challenge for the incumbent
carriers, particularly those where the fo-
cus has traditionally been the local-ac-
cess network. Traditional long-distance
■
36 ■
CIRCUITS & DEVICES SEPTEMBER 2000