C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
cyclic enamide 20 proceeded under mild conditions to give the
tricyclic nucleus as in 21 that constitutes the right half of 1. Thus,
19 was converted to the key intermediate 20 by a four-step sequence
involving mesylation of the phenol, introduction of a Boc group
onto the lactam nitrogen, partial reduction of the ring carbonyl with
NaBH4, and dehydration of the resultant hemiaminal derivative by
treatment with CSA and quinoline. The crucial Heck reaction of
20 was performed in the presence of 5 mol % of Pd2(dba)3 and 20
mol % of P(o-tol)3 to afford the desired tricycle 21 in 83%.
The next challenge in the synthesis is the construction of the
pentacyclic framework via elaboration of the tricyclic aldehyde such
as 4 while controlling the stereochemistry at the C-3 position. After
switching the protecting groups of the amine and the phenol of 21
to the corresponding N-Troc-O-Ac compound, the enamide was
oxidized with dimethyldioxirane15 in MeOH-acetone to generate
an acid-sensitive epoxide, which, without isolation, was immediately
treated with CSA to afford methoxyalcohol 22 (90%) as a single
isomer. The subsequent acyliminium ion-mediated reduction under
acidic conditions occurred from the less hindered exo-face of the
molecule to afford alcohol 23 as a single product with the correct
stereochemistry (94%). Conversion of 23 to the oxazolidine 24 was
achieved in a four-step sequence involving silylation of the alcohol,
cleavages of the two acetyl groups,16 selective benzylation of the
phenolic hydroxyl group, and partial reduction of the lactam
carbonyl with Red-Al with concomitant formation of the oxazolidine
ring. Cleavage of the oxazolidine 24 with TMSCN and BF3‚OEt2
afforded the aminonitrile as a single stereoisomer, which was
subsequently converted to aldehyde 25 by a sequence involving
acetylation of the regenerated hydroxyl group, cleavage of the TBS
ether, and oxidation of the resultant alcohol with Dess-Martin
periodinane.17 As expected from our earlier model studies, hydro-
genolysis of the benzyl ethers 25 invoked a spontaneous cyclization,
giving the desired pentacycle 26, a synthetic equivalent of 3, in
84% yield. Having succeeded in obtaining the key intermediate 26
with the correct oxidation state at the C-4 position, we then turned
our attention to the formation of the ten-membered sulfide ring.
Selective allylation of the phenols, cleavage of the acetyl group,
and condensation of the resultant alcohol with L-cysteine derivative
27 furnished ester 28. Chemoselective hydrazinolysis of the
thioacetate gave the thiol, which, upon exposure to TFA in 2,2,2-
trifluoroethanol under high dilution conditions (0.009 M), smoothly
underwent cyclization to give the ten-membered sulfide. Subsequent
acetylation of the resultant phenol gave 29 (71% in 2 steps).
With the desired ten-membered sulfide 29 in hand, all that is
necessary to complete the total synthesis of 1 is the construction
of the last tetrahydroisoquinoline moiety. Cleavage of the Troc
group followed by reductive alkylation afforded N-methyl amine,
whose Alloc group and allyl ether were simultaneously cleaved
with palladium catalyst to give the aminophenol. According to the
protocol reported by Corey,3a biomimetic transamination reaction18
afforded the known R-ketolactone,3b and subsequent Pictet-
Spengler reaction with amine 30 furnished ecteinascidin 770 (2).19
Finally, generation of the labile hemiaminal from the aminonitrile
was effected by treatment with AgNO3 in CH3CN-H2O to give
ecteinascidin 743 (1), which gave spectral data (1H NMR, 13C NMR,
IR, and HR MS) in full agreement with those of the natural product.
In conclusion, an enantioselective total synthesis of ecteinascidin
743 (1) has been accomplished. Our synthesis features Ugi’s four-
component condensation reaction for a ready access to diketopi-
perazine 19, the intramolecular Heck reaction of the cyclic enamide
20 to give tricycle 21, phenol-aldehyde cyclization to construct
the pentacyclic key intermediate 26, and acid-induced ten-membered
sulfide formation. Further modifications of the present route to
establish a truly practical synthesis of 1 and its analogues are
currently underway in our laboratories.
Acknowledgment. This research was supported in part by the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
We thank Dr. Naoki Saito (Meiji Pharmaceutical University) for
providing spectral data of the natural products.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
spectroscopic data (PDF). This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) (a) Rinehart, K. L.; Holt, T. G.; Fregeau, N. L.; Stroh, J. G.; Keifer, P.
A.; Sun, F.; Li, L. H.; Martin, D. G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4512. (b)
Sakai, R.; Rinehart, K. L.; Guan, Y.; Wang, A. H.-J. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1992, 89, 11456. For a recent review on antitumor compounds
from tunicates, see: (c) Rinehart, K. L. Med. ReV. 2000, 20, 1.
(2) For recent reports on the biological mode of action of 1, see: (a)
Takebayashi, Y.; Pourquier, P.; Zimonjic, D. B.; Nakayama, K.; Emmert,
S.; Ueda, T.; Urasaki, Y.; Kanzaki, A.; Akiyama, S.; Popescu, N.; Kraemer,
K. H.; Pommier, Y. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 961. (b) Zewail-Foote, M.; Li,
V.-S.; Kohn, H.; Bearss, D.; Guzman, M.; Hurley, L. H. Chem. Biol. 2001,
8, 1033.
(3) Total synthesis of 1: (a) Corey, E. J.; Gin, D. Y.; Kania, R. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9202. Semisynthesis of 1: (b) Cuevas, C.; Perez,
M.; Martin, M. J.; Chicharro, J. L.; Fernandez-Rivas, C.; Flores, M.;
Francesch, A.; Gallego, P.; Zarzuelo, M.; Calle, F.; Garcia, J.; Polanco,
C.; Rodriguez, I.; Manzanares, I. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2545. For the previous
reports on synthetic approaches toward 1, see: (c) Zhou, B.; Guo, J.;
Danishefsky, S. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 43. (d) Herberich, B.; Kinugawa,
M.; Vazquez, A.; Williams, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 543. (e)
Myers, A. G.; Plowright, A. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5114. (f)
Saito, N.; Tachi, M.; Seki, R.; Kamayachi, H.; Kubo, A. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 2000, 48, 1549. (g) Zhou, B.; Guo, J.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 2043. (h) Zhou, B.; Edmondson, S.; Padron, J.; Danishef-
sky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 2039. (i) Martinez, E. J.; Corey, E.
J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 993. (j) Endo, A.; Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T. Synlett
1999, 1103. (k) Martinez, E. J.; Owa, T.; Schreiber, S. L.; Corey, E. J.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 3496. (l) Martinez, E. J.; Corey,
E. J. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 75. (m) Saito, N.; Kamayachi, H.; Tachi, M.;
Kubo, A. Heterocycles 1999, 51, 9.
(4) For the preparation of the chiral auxiliary 6 and its application to the
synthesis of a variety of optically active arylglycine derivatives, see:
Tohma, S.; Endo, A.; Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T. Synlett 2001, 1179.
(5) Phenol 5 was prepared from commercially available sesamol in 2 steps:
(i) MOMCl, NaH, THF-DMF, 0 °C to room temperature (97%); (ii)
n-BuLi, B(OMe)3, THF, 0 °C to room temperature; H2O2, AcOH, room
temperature (92%). For experimental details, see the Supporting Informa-
tion.
(6) Hayashi, T.; Konishi, M.; Kobori, Y.; Kumada, M.; Higuchi, T.; Hirotsu,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 158.
(7) Burk, M. J.; Feaster, J. E.; Nugent, W. A.; Harlow, R. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 10125.
(8) Bromide 10 was prepared from commercially available 3-methylcatechol
in 5 steps: (i) TsCl, TEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C (83%); (ii) Br2, AcOH, CH2Cl2,
room temperature (97%); (iii) MeI, K2CO3, acetone, reflux (96%); (iv)
NaOH, EtOH-H2O, reflux (97%); (v) MOMCl, i-Pr2NEt, CH2Cl2, 0 °C
(97%). For experimental details, see the Supporting Information.
(9) (a) Snieckus, V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 879. (b) Plaumann, H. P.; Keay,
B. A.; Rodrigo, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 51, 4921.
(10) Schmidt, U.; Lieberknecht, A.; Wild, J. Synthesis 1984, 53.
(11) For a review, see: Gokel, G.; Lu¨dke, G.; Ugi, I. In Isonitrile Chemistry;
Ugi, I., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1971; p 145.
(12) Gokel, G. W.; Widera, R. P.; Weber, W. P. Organic Syntheses; Wiley:
New York, 1988; Collect. Vol. VI, p 232.
(13) (()-Saframycin A: (a) Fukuyama, T.; Yang, L.; Ajeck, K. L.; Sachleben,
R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3712. (-)-Saframycin B: (b)
Fukuyama, T.; Sachleben, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4957.
(14) For reviews, see: (a) Link, J. T.; Overman, L. E. In Metal-Catalyzed
Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998; p 231. (b) Brase, S.; De
Meijere, A. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Diederich, F.,
Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998;
p 99. (c) Shibasaki, M.; Boden, C. D. J.; Kojima, A. Tetrahedron 1997,
53, 7371.
(15) Murray, R. W.; Singh, M. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1998;
Collect. Vol. IX, p 288.
(16) Ellervik, U.; Magnusson, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 1627.
(17) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 902.
(18) Mild and simple biomimetic conversion of amines to carbonyl com-
pounds: Buckley, T. F.; Rapoport, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4446.
(19) Isolation of ecteinascidin 770 (2) from a Thai tunicate: Suwanborirux,
K.; Charupant, K.; Amnuoypol, S.; Pummangura, S.; Kubo, A.; Saito, N.
J. Nat. Prod. In press.
JA026216D
9
6554 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 23, 2002