E. Szyman´ska et al. / Il Farmaco 57 (2002) 39–44
43
Hz, 2H, H-3%%, H-5%%), 7.22–7.53 (m, 5H, H-3%, H-4%,
4.2. Biological test procedures
H-5%, H-2%%, H-6%%), 7.98 (br.s, NHꢁCH2), 9.16 (br.s,
1-NH), 9.84 (br.s, 3-NH), 10.10 (br.s, 3-NH). Anal.
C17H13ON3Cl2 (C, H, N).
4.2.1. In 6itro e6aluation of antimycobacterial acti6ity
against M. tuberculosis H37R6
1
Primary screening was conducted at 12.5 or 6.25
mg/mL against M. tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC 27294;
American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) in
BACTEC 12B medium using the BACTEC 460-radio-
metric system [21]. Compounds demonstrating at least
90% inhibition were retested against M. tuberculosis
H37Rv at lower concentration to determine the actual
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in the Mi-
croplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA). The MIC was
defined as the lowest concentration inhibiting 99% of
the inoculum. Rifampin (Sigma Chemical Compound,
St. Louis, MO) or isoniazid were included as a positive
drug control.
3i: H NMR l (ppm)=6.70 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.42–7.66
(m, 4H, H-3%, H-5%, H-2%%, H-6%%), 7.77 (d, J=8.7 Hz,
2H, H-3%%, H-5%%), 8.80 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H, H-6%), 10.10–
11.20 (br.s, 2H, NHaniline, 3-NH). Anal. C16H10ON3Cl3
(C, H, N).
1
3j: H NMR l (ppm)=6.59 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.38–7.47
(m, 4H, H-3%, H-5%, H-5%%, H-6%%), 7.76 (br.s, 1H, H-3%%),
8.25 (br.s, 1H, H-6%), 10.24 (br.s, 2H, NHaniline, 3-NH).
Anal. C16H9ON3Cl4 (C, H, N).
1
3k: H NMR l (ppm)=6.72 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.14 (d,
J=8 Hz, 1H, H-6%%), 7.36–7.46 (m, 2H, H-4%%, H-5%%),
7.59 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 1H, H-5%), 7.66 (s, 1H, H-3%), 8.06
(s, 1H, H-2%%), 8.81 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, H-6%), 10.38 (br.s,
1H, NHaniline), 11.00 (br.s, 1H, 3-NH). Anal.
C16H10ON3Cl3 (C, H, N).
4.2.2. Antimicrobial acti6ity
1
The activity of the obtained compounds was investi-
gated, using disc diffusion method [22,23], against type
strains of microorganisms as follows: S. aureus (ATCC
25923), S. pneumoniae (ATCC 49619), Enterococcus
faecalis (ATCC 29212), Pseudomonas aeruginosa
(ATCC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), B.
cereus (ATCC 11778), M. catarrhalis (CBM 5), M.
luteus (CBM 4), Streptococcus pyogenes (CBM 7), H.
influenzae (CBM 15) and yeast fungi: C. albicans (CBM
26). As test medium for aerobic bacteria Mueller–Hin-
ton agar (Difco Laboratories USA) was used (for H.
influenzae Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with he-
matin and yeast extract). Tests for fungi were per-
formed on Yeast Nitrogen Base medium (Difco).
Gentamycin and nalidixic acid were used as positive
drug controls.
The compounds studied were solubilized using
DMSO. The basic concentration was 10 000 mg/mL.
From such a solution a series of dilutions with concen-
trations ranging from 5 to 10 000 mg/mL were prepared
(for reference substances the concentrations ranged
from 0.0045 to 10 000 mg/mL). Minimum inhibitory
concentration (MIC) values of the compounds were
determined with reference to standard microorganism.
The corresponding solution (20 ml) with a different
concentration was put on the sterile paper disc (9 mm
of diameter). Discs were placed on the solid medium
with suspension of a tested microorganism at 0.9%
NaCl. The MIC breakpoints were determined: after 24
h at 37 °C for bacteria and after 48 h at 28 °C for
fungi.
3l: H NMR l (ppm)=6.61 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.15 (t,
J=7.4 Hz, 1H, H-4%%), 7.38 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H, H-5%%),
7.46–7.52 (m, 2H, H-5%, H-6%%), 7.65 (s, 1H, H-3%), 7.94
(br.s, 1H, H-3%%), 8.58 (br.s, 1H, H-6%), 10.97 (br.s, 2H,
NHaniline, 3-NH). Anal. C16H10ON3Cl3 (C, H, N).
1
3m: H NMR l (ppm)=6.68 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.10 (t,
J=7.3 Hz, 1H, H-4%%), 7.38 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 2H, H-3%%,
H-5%%), 7.52 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 1H, H-5%), 7.64 (s, 1H, H-3%),
7.74 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, H-2%%, H-6%%), 8.85 (br.s, 1H,
H-6%), 10.17 (br.s, 1H, NHaniline), 10.80 (br.s, 1H, 3-
NH). Anal. C16H11ON3Cl2 (C, H, N).
1
3n: H NMR l (ppm)=4.57 (s, 2H, CH2), 6.51 (s,
1H, CHꢀ), 7.22–7.47 (m, 6H, H-5%, H-2%%, H-3%%, H-4%%,
H-5%%, H-6%%), 7.59 (s, 1H, H-3%), 8.32 (br.s, 1H,
NHꢁCH2), 8.90 (d, J=8.1 Hz, 1H, H-6%), 11.03 (br.s,
1H, 3-NH). Anal. C17H13ON3Cl2 (C, H, N).
3o: 1H NMR l (ppm)=6.81 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.27–7.52
(m, 5H, H-3%, H-4%, H-5%, H-3%%, H-5%%), 7.80 (d, J=8.7
Hz, 2H, H-2%%, H-6%%), 8.80 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H, H-6%),
10.25 (br.s, 1H, 1-NH), 10.98 (br.s, 1H, 3-NH). Anal.
C16H11ON3Cl2 (C, H, N).
3p: 1H NMR l (ppm)=6.63 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.26–7.52
(m, 6H, H-3%, H-4%, H-5%, H-3%%, H-5%%, H-6%%), 8.30 (br.s,
1H, H-6%), 10.20 (br.s, 1H, NHaniline), 10.74 (br.s, 1H,
3-NH). Anal. C16H11ON3Cl2 (C, H, N).
1
3q: H NMR l (ppm)=6.83 (s, 1H, CHꢀ), 7.14 (d,
J=6.8 Hz, 1H, H-6%%), 7.27–7.43 (m, 5H, H-3%, H-4%,
H-5%, H-4%%, H-5%%), 8.19 (s, 1H, H-2%%), 8.83 (d, J=6.9
Hz, 1H, H-6%), 10.34 (br.s, 1H, NHaniline), 11.05 (br.s,
1H, 3-NH). Anal. C16H11ON3Cl2 (C, H, N).
In the 1H NMR spectra of the compounds 3f–h
double signals assigned to 1-NH and 3-NH protons are
observed. The splits are probably connected with the
phenomenon of coexistence of two (or more) tau-
tomeric forms. The discussion of dynamic nature of the
described compounds is going to be presented in the
separate article [27].
All antimicrobial potency tests, the medium and mi-
croorganisms suspensions were performed according to
NCCLS procedures. In each assay the control of both
microorganism culture sterility and standard microor-
ganism growth was performed. It was found that
DMSO showed neither antibacterial nor fungicidal
activity.