functionalization.6 Subsequently, these auxiliaries have
been used by a number of groups for palladium-, nickel-,
iron-, and ruthenium-catalyzed sp2 and sp3 CÀH bond
functionalization.7 Recently, we have developed amino-
quinoline- and picolinamide-directed, copper-catalyzed
sulfenylation, amination, and fluorination of arene and
heteroarene CÀH bonds.8 The common feature of these
reactions is the coupling of a nucleophile with a CÀH
bond. We speculated that copper-catalyzed etherification
of sp2 CÀH bonds should be possible if aminoquinoline or
picolinic acid directing groups are employed. Additionally,
in an insightful mechanistic study of Cu(II)-mediated sp2
CÀH bond oxidation, Stahl has reported the methoxyla-
tion of N-(8-quinolinyl)benzamide by employing metha-
nol solvent and 2 equiv of Cu(OAc)2.9a
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditionsa
entry
catalyst
base
oxidant
yield (%)
1b
Cu(OAc)2
Ag2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
NMO
NMO
NMO/O2
air
21
64
67
68
88
2c
Cu(OAc)2
3c,d
4e
5e,f
Cu(OAc)2
(CuOH)2CO3
(CuOH)2CO3
air
Reaction of 8-aminoquinoline 3-trifluoromethylbenz-
amide 1 was investigated with respect to Cu catalyst,
oxidant, and base (Table 1). The conditions developed
for arene amination8b resulted in a low yield of coupling
product (entry 1). Replacing Ag2CO3 with K2CO3 was
beneficial (entry 2), and the reaction could be run under
an atmosphere of oxygen for additional increase of yield
(entry 3). Interestingly, omission of NMO oxidant and
running the reaction under air in an open flask was
successful (entry 4). Furthermore, the yield could be
increased if reaction time was decreased from 12 to 6 h
(entry 5). Thus, the optimal reaction conditions involve
1 equiv of phenol, K2CO3 base, 11% (22% based on Cu)
of (CuOH)2CO3 catalyst, DMF solvent, 110 °C, and air
as oxidant.
a Amide (0.1 mmol), phenol (0.1 mmol), catalyst (0.02 mmol), base
(0.2 mmol). Yields determined by NMR of crude reaction mixtures.
b NMO (N-methylmorpholine oxide) (0.2 mmol), NMP solvent. c NMO
(0.2 mmol), DMF solvent. d Under 1 atm of O2. e Reaction open to air, 11
mol % catalyst (22% Cu). f Isolated yield, reaction time 6 h.
tolerated (entry 6). Ortho-substituted phenols are reactive
(entry 8). Interestingly, bisphenol A can be used and
double arylation product 2 was isolated in 66% yield
(eq 1). The yields range from good to excellent, and
reaction times are 2À8 h. A 3.2 mmol scale reaction of 1
with 4-tert-butylphenol afforded 73% isolated yield of
product (entry 1).
The reaction scope with respect to phenols is presented
in Table 2 and eq 1. Reactions were run on a 0.5 mmol
scale. Electron-rich (entries 1, 8, and 9) and electron-poor
(entries 3À6) phenols are reactive. The reactions tolerate
most functional groups, such as thioether (entry 2), bro-
mide (entry 4), chloride (entries 7 and 8), amino (entry 9),
and even iodide (entry 5). Ester functionality is also
(6) (a) Zaitsev, V. G.; Shabashov, D.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 13154. (b) Shabashov, D.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 3965. (c) Nadres, E. T.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,
134, 7.
Reaction scope with respect to aliphatic alcohols is
presented in Table 3. Optimal base for alkoxylation is
tetramethylguanidine (TMG), and the best results were
obtained by employing 5 equiv of alcohol in pyridine
solvent. Air was used as an oxidant. Simple primary alkyl
alcohols such as cyclopropylmethanol afford good yields
of the product (entry 1). Trifluoromethanol (entry 2) and
allyl alcohol (entry 3) are reactive, and coupling products
were isolated in 73 and 71% yields. More complex struc-
tures such as carbitol (entry 4), cinchonine (entry 5), and
ethyl lactate (entry 6) gave products in fair to excellent
yields. The latter examples show that aliphatic esters,
amines, esters, and polyethers are tolerated in the reaction.
Reaction with trifluoroethanol was carried out in closed
vessel pressurized with O2 due to volatility of the alcohol.
The reaction scope with respect to aminoquinoline
benzamides is presented in Table 4. Cyano- (entry 1),
trifluoromethyl- (entry 2), nitro- (entry 3), and methoxy-
substituted (entries 4 and 5) amides are reactive, and
(7) (a) He, G.; Lu, C.; Zhao, Y.; Nack, W. A.; Chen, G. Org. Lett.
2012, 14, 2944. (b) He, G.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Lu, C.; Chen, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3. (c) Zhang, S.-Y.; He, G.; Zhao, Y.; Wright, K.;
Nack, W. A.; Chen, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7313. (d) Gou, F.-
R.; Wang, X.-C.; Huo, P.-F.; Bi, H.-P.; Guan, Z.-H.; Liang, Y.-M. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 5726. (e) Gutekunst, W. R.; Gianatassio, R.; Baran, P. S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7507. (f) Ano, Y.; Tobisu, M.; Chatani,
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12984. (g) Gutekunst, W. R.; Baran,
P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19076. (h) Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy,
L. R.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3391. (i) Aihara, Y.; Chatani, N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5308. (j) Nishino, M.; Hirano, K.; Satoh,
T.; Miura, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4457. (k) Shang, R.; Ilies,
L.; Matsumoto, A.; Nakamura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6030.
(8) (a) Tran, L. D.; Popov, I.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012,
134, 18237. (b) Tran, L. D.; Roane, J.; Daugulis, O. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2013, 52, 6043. (c) Truong, T.; Klimovica, K.; Daugulis, O. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9342.
(9) (a) Suess, A. M.; Ertem, M. Z.; Cramer, C. J.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9797. (b) Ribas, X.; Jackson, D. A.; Donnadieu,
B.; Mahıa, J.; Parella, T.; Xifra, R.; Hedman, B.; Hodgson, K. O.;
Llobet, A.; Stack, T. D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2991. (c)
Huffman, L. M.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9196. (d) King,
A. E.; Huffman, L. M.; Casitas, A.; Costas, M.; Ribas, X.; Stahl, S. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12068. (e) Campbell, A. N.; Stahl, S. S. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 851.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 22, 2013
5843