C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Working model for nucleophilic addition to a cation-π complex.
supported by structural optimization of the intermediary pyridinium
cation by ab initio calculations at the RHF/3-21G* level,17 where
conformer II is 2.1 kcal/mol more stable than conformer I. There-
fore, the equilibrium between conformers I and II favors II; as a
result, a nucleophile will attack the conformer II from the non-
shielded side to give a chiral dihydropyridine in good stereoselec-
tivity.
In summary, we have shown the first evidence for the existence
of an intramolecular cation-π interaction between a pyridinium
cation and a benzyl moiety. Moreover, the utility of the intramo-
lecular cation-π interaction was demonstrated by the synthesis of
chiral 1,4-dihydropyridines with excellent stereoselectivity. Since
the cation-π interaction generally has a stronger interactive force
than the π-π interaction, it will be a promising conformation-
controlling tool for a variety of synthetic reactions.
Figure 1. X-ray structures for 1b (a) and 2b (b). The thermal ellipsoids
are set at the 30% probability level for each. The hydrogen atoms and a
counterion are omitted for clarity. Selected interatomic distances for 2b
(Å): C3‚‚‚C8 3.323, C3‚‚‚C13 3.491, C4‚‚‚C8 3.551, C4‚‚‚C9 3.557, C4‚
‚‚C10 3.530, C4‚‚‚C11 3.511, C4‚‚‚C12 3.441, C4‚‚‚C13 3.454, C5‚‚‚C12
3.354.
Table 2. Addition of Ketene Silyl Acetals to 1
Acknowledgment. This work was financially supported by a
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 13650901) from the
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
de/% of
4 or 5b
a
entry
compd
acetal
solv
yield/%
(1,4-: 1,6-)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1b
1c
3a
3a
3a
3a
3a
3bc
3b
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CHCl3
THF
toluene
CH3CN
CH2Cl2
94
60(94)
90
56(99)
70(99)
80
86:14
78:22
93:7
87:13
97:3
>99
Supporting Information Available: Crystallographic data for 1b,
2b and 4b, synthetic procedures and spectral data for 1a-1c, 2a, 2b,
4b and 5b, and optimized structures for two isomers of 5b with their
stereochemical assignment (PDF). This material is available free of
12
1b
1b
1b
1b
1b
>99
>99
>99
>99:1
93:7
>99(93:7)d
61(99)
>99(94:6)d
References
a Isolated yields. Conversion yield is indicated in parentheses. b Deter-
mined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. c Eight equivalents were used. d syn/anti
diastereomer ratio.
(1) For reviews see, (a) Jones, G. B.Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7999. (b) Jones,
G. B.; Chapman, B. J. Synthesis 1995, 475.
(2) For a review, see: Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97,
1303.
(3) Neda, I.; Sakhaii, P.; Wassmann, A.; Niemeyer, U.; Gu¨nther, E.; Engel,
J. Synthesis 1999, 1625.
in Table 2 (entries 1 and 2). Remarkable is the significant difference
in the stereoselectivities depending on the chiral auxiliaries; addition
to 1b gave excellent selectivity (entry 1), whereas the selectivity
in the case of 1c was very low (entry 2). This would be attributable
to the geometrical differences between the intermediary pyridinium
salts; the benzyl group much more effectively shields one side of
the pyridinium face than does the phenyl group. Various solvents,
such as CHCl3, THF, toluene, and CH3CN are available in these
reactions (entries 3-6). Ketene silyl acetal 3b also serves as a good
nucleophile to give 1,4-adduct 5b in excellent regio- and stereo-
selectivities with good syn selectivities about the newly produced
two chiral centers (entries 6 and 7). The 1H NMR spectrum for the
major isomer shows a smaller coupling constant between 4H and
1′H and a significant downfield shift of 1′H due to a deshielding
effect of the dihydropyridine moiety (4.9 Hz and δ 4.41 for the
major isomer, and 7.6 Hz and δ 3.78 for the minor isomer), which
suggest 1′H being syn to the 4H on the basis of the optimized
structures obtained by ab initio calculations at the RHF/3-21G*
level.17 It is worthwhile to note that the chiral auxiliary of adduct
4b can be removed with Cp2Zr(H)Cl18 to give the corresponding
aldehyde without reduction of the other functionaries.
(4) Lakshminarasimhan, P.; Sunoj, R. B.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Ramamurthy,
V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4815.
(5) (a) Stratakis, M.; Rabalakos, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4545. (b)
Stratakis, M.; Froudakis, G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1369.
(6) (a) Yamada, S.; Ichikawa, M. Tetrahedran Lett. 1999, 40, 4231. (b)
Yamada, S.; Morita, C. Chem. Lett. 2001, 1034. (c) Yamada, S.; Misono,
T.; Ichikawa, M.; Morita, C. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8939.
(7) Intermolecular Py+‚‚‚Ph interactions are observed in various inclusion
complexes. For examples, see: (a) Hwang, G. T.; Kim, B. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 5917. (b) Araki, K.; Hayashida, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000,
41, 1209. (c) Ngola, S. M.; Dougherty, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
4566.
(8) For a review, see: Goldmann, S.; Stoltefuss, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1991, 30, 1559.
(9) For a review, see: Burgess, V. A.; Davies, S. G.; Skerlj, R. T.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1991, 2, 299.
(10) For a review, see: Bosch, J.; Bennasar, M.-L. Synlett 1995, 587.
(11) (a) Bennasar, M.-L.; Zulaica, E.; Alonso, Y.; Mata, I.; Molins, E.; Bosch,
J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1166. (b) Ohno, A.; Oda, S.; Yamazaki, N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 399. (c) Mangeney, P.; Gosmini, R.; Raussou,
S.; Commerc¸on, M.; Alexakis, A. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1877 and
references therein.
(12) Kanemasa, S.; Onimura, K. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 8631.
(13) Imwinkelreid, R.; Hegedus, L. S. Organometallics 1988, 7, 702.
(14) Jones, G. B.; Chapman, B. J.; Mathews, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
2928 and references therein.
(15) (a) Comins, D. L.; Joseph, S. P.; Goehring, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 4719. (b) Kawabata, T.; Nagato, M.; Takasu, K.; Fuji, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3169.
(16) For examples, see: (a) Wisner, J. A.; Beer, P. D.; Drew, M. G. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3606. (b) Philip, D.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Spencer,
N.; Stoddart, J. F.; Williams, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991,
1584. (c) Ortholand, J.-Y.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.;
Williams, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1394.
(17) Ab initio calculations were performed by using PC SPARTAN pro.
(18) White, J. M.; Tunoori, A. R.; Georg, G. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
11995.
The absolute configuration of the stereogenic center for 4b was
clarified to be S by X-ray analysis. Analogously, the two chiral
centers for the major isomer of 5b are assigned to be (4R,1′S). This
indicates that the cation-π interaction will occur with the re face
of the pyridinium ring, and the nucleophiles attack from the si face
of the complex II as shown in Figure 2. This working model was
JA0203317
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 28, 2002 8185