A R T I C L E S
Nicolaou and Boddy
While this approach was successfully employed in our2 and the
Boger4 syntheses of the vancomycin aglycon, a more effective
and intellectually pleasing solution was deemed worthy of
pursuit.
Below we present the design and development of a diastereo-
selective macrocyclization forming one or the other atropisomer
of the diaryl ether ring systems. This approach allowed for the
synthesis of a single atropisomer of the vancomycin type
C-O-D diaryl ether ring system. It is also one of the first
examples of the stereoselective synthesis of nonbiaryl stereo-
genic axes.6-8
Experimental Design
From the outset of our investigations toward the development of
the traizine-based diaryl ether forming macrocyclization,9 we considered
the possibility of designing an atropselective version of the reaction.
Three potential mechanisms were identified by which atropselectivity
could be designed into this process. The first approach would involve
the temporary use of bulky substituents on the C and E aromatic rings
to direct the chlorines into the correct orientation through unfavorable
steric interactions. The second method relied on the potential use of
stereogenic centers in the triazine moiety to influence the atropisomeric
outcome of the reaction. The last hypothesis required the possible
development of an asymmetric copper ligand to influence the atrop-
selectivity.
Of these three methods, the first approach was viewed as the most
attractive solution to the problem at hand. Furthermore, the required
system would be the easiest to design and had a high likelihood of
success. In addition, this strategy would be independent from the method
of macrocyclization. Thus, it would, conceivably, be applicable to other
macrocyclization conditions employed in the synthesis of vancomycin
systems such as the popular nitro group activated nucleophilic aromatic
substitution.1,10
The steric hindrance approach was to rely on the â-hydroxy groups
found on the tyrosine residues in vancomycin to provide a handle for
inducing atropselectivity. By placing a bulky auxiliary group in the
ortho position on the tyrosine moiety, an unfavorable steric interaction
with the protected benzylic alcohol would be induced, creating an
energetic penalty that would funnel the reaction down the lower energy
pathway, forming a single atropisomeric product (Figure 2).
In selecting an appropriate substituent to influence the stereogenic
outcome of the reaction, we searched for one that was synthetically
tractable and compatible with our triazene mediated diaryl ether forming
reaction, and, therefore, a protected phenolic group was identified as a
suitable candidate. The required amino acid derivatives could be
generated from readily available starting materials employing the aldol
reaction. Furthermore, on the basis of work by the Evans group,11,12 it
seemed likely that the auxiliary bearing phenolic group could be
successfully removed. Last, the added electron density from the
auxiliary oxygen substituent was expected to improve the efficiency
of our diaryl ether formation by increasing the nucleophilicity of the
Figure 2. Design of an atropselective macrocyclization for a vancomycin
C-O-D ring system. The bulky auxiliary group on the aromatic ring is
expected to generate an unfavorable steric interaction with the â-hydroxy
group on the tyrosine residue. This should favor one atropisomeric transition
state over the other.
phenolic moiety. The fact that the C-O-D ring system of vancomycin
cyclizes with no atropselectivity2f made it an ideal model system to
test this hypothesis.
On the basis of the above considerations, we identified the modified
C-O-D systems 3 and 5 as our targets (Scheme 1). According to our
mechanism, the cyclization of compound 2 was expected to provide
3a as the major product. To further probe the level of control through
this design, it was decided to employ diastereomer 4, which possessed
the opposite stereochemistry at the â-hydroxy group of the tyrosine
residue, as well. Following similar reasoning, this system was expected
to show preference for the atropisomer of opposite configuration, 5b.
Results
Computer Simulations. Before undertaking any experimental
verification of our hypothesis, we performed a preliminary test
by conducting computer simulations. The C-O-D ring systems
3a and 3b, as well as the â-hydroxy group epimers 5a and 5b,
were computationally modeled in order to identify the lowest
energy conformation for each compound. Molecular dynamics
followed by minimization was performed using Discover 3.0
with the CVFF13 and CFF9114 force fields. The results were
similar. Compound 3a was significantly more stable than
compound 3b (-7.3 kcal/mol CVFF; -5.6 kcal/mol CFF91).
Compound 5b, however, was found to be only slightly more
(6) For the stereoselective synthesis of biaryl stereogenic axes, see refs 2e
and 7. For the stereoselective synthesis of nonbiaryl stereogenic axes, see
ref 8.
(7) (a) Yin, J.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12051-12052.
(b) Spring, D. R.; Krishnan, S.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 5656-5657. (c) Lloyd-Williams, P.; Giralt, E. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2001,
30, 145-157. (d) Ku, Y.-Y.; Grieme, T.; Raje, P.; Sharma, P.; King, S.
A.; Morton, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4282-4286.
(8) (a) Koide, H.; Uemura, M. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2483-2484. (b)
Kitagawa, O.; Izawa, H.; Sato, K.; Dobashi, A.; Taguchi, T. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 2634-2640. (c) For a recent example reported after the
completion of this work, see: Layton, M. E.; Morales, C. A.; Shair, M. D.
J. Am. Chem.. Soc. 2002, 124, 773-75.
(13) (a) Lifson, S.; Hagler, A. T.; Dauber, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101,
5111-5121. (b) Hagler, A. T.; Lifson, S.; Dauber, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 5122-5130. (c) Hagler, A. T.; Dauber, P.; Lifson, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 5131-5141. (d) Dauber-Osguthorpe, P.; Roberts,
V. A.; Osguthorpe, D. J.; Wolff, J.; Genest, M.; Hagler, A. T. Proteins:
Struct. Func. Gen. 1988, 4, 31-47.
(14) (a) Maple, J. R.; Hwang, M. J.; Stockfisch, T. P.; Dinur, U.; Waldman,
M.; Ewig, C. S.; Hagler, A. T. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 162-182. (b)
Hwang, M. J.; Stockfisch, T. P.; Hagler, A. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 2515-2525. (c) Maple, J. R.; Hwang, M.-J.; Stockfisch, T. P.; Hagler,
A. T. Isr. J. Chem. 1994, 34, 195-231. (d) Peng, Z.; Ewig, C. S.; Hwang,
M.-J.; Waldman, M.; Hagler, A. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 7243-
7252. (e) Maple, J. R.; Hwang, M.-J.; Jalkanen, K. J.; Stockfisch, T. P.;
Hagler, A. T. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 430-458. (f) Hwang, M.-J.; Ni,
X.; Waldman, M.; Ewig, C. S.; Hagler, A. T. Biopolymers 1998, 45, 435-
468.
(9) Nicolaou, K. C.; Boddy, C. N. C.; Natarajan, S.; Yue, T.-Y.; Li, H.; Bra¨se,
S.; Ramanjulu, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3421-3422.
(10) Zhu, J. Synlett 1997, 133-144.
(11) Evans, D. A.; Dinsmore, C. J.; Evrard, D. A.; DeVries, K. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 6426-6427.
(12) Evans, D. A.; Dinsmore, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6029-6032.
9
10452 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 35, 2002