Preparation and biological properties of ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules190710386

In this study, a series of twenty- Two ring-substituted naphthalene-1- carboxanilides were prepared and characterized. Primary in vitro screening of the synthesized carboxanilides was performed against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. N-(2-Methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide, N-(3-methoxyphenyl) naphthalene-1-carboxamide, N-(3-methylphenyl)naphthalene-1- carboxamide, N-(4-methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide and N-(3-fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1- carboxamide showed against M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis two-fold higher activity than rifampicin and three-fold higher activity than ciprofloxacin. The most effective antimycobacterial compounds demonstrated insignificant toxicity against the human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line. The testing of biological activity of the compounds was completed with the study of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) inhibition in isolated spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts. The PET-inhibiting activity expressed by IC₅₀ value of the most active compound N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]naphthalene-1- carboxamide was 59 μmol/L. The structure- Activity relationships are discussed.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules190710386

Molecules 2014, 19, 10386-10409; doi:10.3390/molecules190710386
OPEN ACCESS
molecules
ISSN 1420-3049
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Article
Preparation and Biological Properties of Ring-Substituted
Naphthalene-1-Carboxanilides
Tomas Gonec 1, Jiri Kos 1, Eoghan Nevin 2, Rodney Govender 2, Matus Pesko 3, Jan Tengler 1,
Ivan Kushkevych 4, Vendula Stastna 4, Michal Oravec 5, Peter Kollar 4, Jim O’Mahony 2,
Katarina Kralova 6, Aidan Coffey 2 and Josef Jampilek 1,*
1
Department of Chemical Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Palackeho 1/3, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Bishopstown, Cork, Ireland
3
Department of Environmental Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University,
Mlynska dolina Ch-2, 84215 Bratislava, Slovakia
4
Department of Human Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of
Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackeho 1/3, 61242 Brno, Czech Republic
5
Global Change Research Centre AS CR, Belidla 986/4a, 60300 Brno, Czech Republic
6
Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynska dolina Ch-2,
84215 Bratislava, Slovakia
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: josef.jampilek@gmail.com;
Tel.: +420-541-562-926.
Received: 10 May 2014; in revised form: 13 July 2014 / Accepted: 14 July 2014 /
Published: 17 July 2014
Abstract: In this study, a series of twenty-two ring-substituted naphthalene-1-
carboxanilides were prepared and characterized. Primary in vitro screening of the
synthesized carboxanilides was performed against Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis.
N-(2-Methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide,
N-(3-methoxy-
phenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide,
N-(3-methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide,
N-(4-methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide
and
N-(3-fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1-
carboxamide showed against M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis two-fold higher activity
than rifampicin and three-fold higher activity than ciprofloxacin. The most effective
antimycobacterial compounds demonstrated insignificant toxicity against the human
monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line. The testing of biological activity of the compounds
was completed with the study of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) inhibition in
isolated spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts. The PET-inhibiting activity expressed

Molecules 2014, 19
10387
by IC50 value of the most active compound N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]naphthalene-1-
carboxamide was 59 μmol/L. The structure-activity relationships are discussed.
Keywords: naphthalene; lipophilicity; in vitro antimycobacterial activity; in vitro
cytotoxicity; photosynthetic electron transport inhibition; spinach chloroplasts
1. Introduction
Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the pathogen responsible for tuberculosis (TB). This disorder is more
prevalent in the world today than at any other time. The number of notified cases of multi-drug-resistant
strains of M. tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is increasing in 27 high MDR-TB burden countries. In addition,
other non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are now recognized as significant human pathogens and
cause difficult-to-treat or incurable diseases, such as pulmonary disease, lymphadenitis, skin and soft
tissue disease, gastrointestinal and skeletal infections, and potentially resulting in death, especially in
cases involving immunocompromised patients. The emergence of NTM underlines the urgency of
searching for new structure types of drugs; it also seems to be important to re-engineer and re-test old
drug families to achieve effective control of both TB and NTM [1–3].
As biologically active compounds, including drugs and pesticides, target particular biological
systems, some herbicides can also have molecular sites of action in mammals/non-plant organisms.
However, targeting compounds to biological systems with similar physicochemical properties can lead to
completely different biological responses in plants and animals. Therefore, many innovative/original
pharmaceutical companies perform screening of biologically active compounds, not only as potential
drugs, but also as potential pesticides. For example, fluconazole was firstly discovered as a potent
pesticide, and subsequently it was confirmed as an antifungal drug [4–6]. Moreover, good correlation
between microbiological activities and herbicidal or antialgal effects was found [7–18].
The presence of an amide (-NHCO-) group [19,20] is characteristic of a number of biologically
active compounds, such as antimicrobials, antiprotozoals, antineoplastics, antivirotics,
anti-inflammatory agents or herbicides [7,9,12,13,21–28]. The wide spectrum of biological effects of
substituted (mono/diaza)naphthalene scaffolds includes especially anti-infective and antineoplastics
activity [9–12,21,29–42]. In addition, some (aza)naphthalene derivatives also showed noteworthy
herbicidal activity [9–13,24,30,32,34] explained by reversible binding to photosystem II (PS II),
a membrane-protein complex in the thylakoid membranes, which catalyses the oxidation of water and
the reduction of plastoquinone [43], and, thereby, inhibit photosynthesis [44–46].
In the context of the previously-described azanaphtalenes [24,30–37] or various amides [8–12,25–28],
ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides as biologically active compounds were investigated. All
the compounds were tested for activity against NTM species—M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and
additionally they were assessed for their potency to inhibit photosynthetic electron transport in isolated
spinach chloroplasts (Spinacia oleracea L.). Relationships between the structure and their in vitro
antimycobacterial activity or/and activity related to inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport
(PET) in isolated spinach chloroplasts are discussed.

Molecules 2014, 19
10388
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Chemistry
The studied compounds were prepared using two methods according to Scheme 1. The discussed
compounds were synthesized by using two-step synthesis (Method A: a,b) via 1-naphthoyl chloride as
intermediate [9] or by one-pot microwave-assisted synthesis (Method B: c) [10]. Both methods yielded
a series of twenty-two N-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides 1–8c.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides 1–8c.
Reagents and conditions: (a) SOCl2, toluene; (b) triethylamine, dichloromethane, (substitute) aniline;
(c) PCl3, chlorobenzene, (substitute) aniline, MW.
2.2. Lipophilicity Characteristics and Electronic Properties
Within structure-activity relationship investigations of various molecular descriptors, topological
indexes or parameters describing physicochemical properties are used. Thus, they represent numerical
values that characterize properties of molecules that influence biological activity (receptor binding). In
our previous studies biological activity was strongly influenced especially by lipophilicity and
electronic parameters [7–13,24–28,30–37], expressed either as Hammett’s σ parameters or Taft polar
substituent constants σ*.
Lipophilicity is a property that has a major effect on bioavailability, biotransformation as well as
pharmacological activity, because drugs cross biological membranes through passive transport, which
strongly depends on their lipophilicity. Lipophilicity of the studied compounds was determined by
RP-HPLC as capacity factor logarithm (log k). The procedure was performed under isocratic
conditions with methanol as an organic modifier in the mobile phase using an end-capped non-polar
C18 stationary RP column. The results of ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides 1–8c are shown in
Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. The highest experimental lipophilicity was found for N-[4-
(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]naphthalene-1-carboxamide (7c), while N-(4-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-
carboxamide (2c) showed the lowest log k value. Lipophilicity was also calculated as log P using
ACD/Percepta ver. 2012 (Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada).

Molecules 2014, 19
10389
Table 1. Structure of ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides 1–8c, experimentally
determined values of lipophilicity log k, calculated values of lipophilicity (log P), predicted
hydrophobic distributive parameter π, predicted polar substituent constants σ*, in vitro
antimycobacterial activity (MIC/IC90) of compounds against clinical isolate of
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis CIT03 (MAP) in comparison with isoniazid
(INH), ciprofloxacin (CPX), and rifampicin (RIF) standards, in vitro cytotoxicity assay
(LD50) of choice compounds and IC50 values related to PET inhibition in isolated spinach
chloroplasts in comparison with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) standard.
MAP MIC/IC90
LD50
PET
Comp.
R1
log k
log P a
π a
σ* a
[μmol/L]
[μmol/L] IC50 [μmol/L]
b
c
1
2a
H
0.5620
3.88
3.60
3.76
3.76
4.42
4.42
4.42
3.78
4.05
3.67
4.48
4.75
4.60
4.68
4.92
4.76
4.64
5.22
4.68
3.98
4.00
3.67
−
0.40 0.26
0.30 0.29
0.56 0.30
0.35 0.38
0.86 0.29
0.86 0.30
0.86 0.38
0.36 0.31
0.89 0.32
0.85 0.39
0.91 0.33
1.54 0.32
1.19 0.40
1.08 0.31
1.61 0.31
1.57 0.40
1.59 0.27
1.75 0.33
1.41 0.41
0.65 0.27
0.79 0.34
0.49 0.43
−
c
2-OCH3 0.8013
3-OCH3 0.6087
4-OCH3 0.4953
54
>30
c
2b
54
b
>30
c
2c
−
b
c
3a
2-CH3
3-CH3
4-CH3
2-F
0.5309
0.7624
0.7551
0.5592
0.7204
0.6315
0.8322
0.9357
0.9223
0.8892
1.0047
0.9985
0.7595
1.0862
1.1480
0.9090
0.8155
0.7328
–
−
3b
57
>30
>30
−
136
3c
57
b
381
c
4a
4b
3-F
57
b
>30
−
131
c
4c
4-F
b
b
b
b
b
c
5a
2-Cl
3-Cl
4-Cl
2-Br
3-Br
4-Br
2-CF3
3-CF3
4-CF3
2-NO2
3-NO2
4-NO2
–
−
5b
−
107
5c
−
102
c
6a
−
6b
−
278
6c
184
b
−
365
c
7a
−
b
7b
−
114
59
7c
793
b
−
8a
−
476
492
129
1.9
−
b
b
8b
−
8c
−
DCMU
INH
CPX
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
1823
181
109
−
−
−
−
−
−
RIF
a
−
−
−
−
−
calculated using ACD/Percepta (Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012):
π: hydrophobicity contribution of the substituent in position 1 of naphthalene core, σ *: electron properties
contribution of the substituent in position 1 of naphthalene core; b no activity; c precipitation during experiment.

Molecules 2014, 19
10390
Figure 1. Match of experimentally found log k values with calculated log P data of
ortho-substituted (A) and meta- and para-substituted derivatives (B) and with calculated
distributive parameter π (hydrophobicity contribution of the substituent in position 1 of
naphthalene) of ortho-substituted (C) and meta- and para-substituted derivatives (D).
A
B
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
r = 0.8591
r = 0.2559
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
3.0
3.5
4.0
log P
4.5
5.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
log P
D
C
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
r = 0.8972
r = 0.3079
0.0
0.5
1.0
π
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
π
The results obtained with all the ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides show that the
experimentally-determined lipophilicity (log k) of the discussed compounds poorly correlates with the
calculated values log P of compounds 1–8c as shown in Figure 1A,B. For the ortho-substituted
derivatives no correlation was found. Similar poor correlation between experimentally and predicted
lipophilicity values was described for ring-substituted 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1-carboxanilides and
1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides [11,12] and for hydroxyquinolinecarboxamides [24];
nevertheless, this poor correlation was attributed to the phenolic moiety in the position vicinal to the
carboxamide group. As there is no any phenolic moiety in these structures, lipophilicity was
additionally expressed as a hydrophobic distributive parameter π of the carboxamide moiety and ring-
substituted phenyl; it was also calculated using ACD/Percepta, see Table 1. Again, it can be stated that
no match of log k to π of the ortho-substituted compounds was found (Figure 1C), while the meta- and
para-substituted derivatives showed better match, see Figure 1D. The most significant deviations
within the dependence illustrated in Figure 1D can be observed for 4-CF3 (7c) and 4-NO2 (8c).
Based on these observations, some intramolecular interactions between the carboxamide moiety and
the phenyl substituents could be supposed that influence the resulting lipophilicity of compounds.
These interactions are characterized rather by using distributive parameter π of substituents in position 1
of naphthalene than by using log P parameter of the whole molecule. Differences between expected
and found values were also observed during TLC, when the purity of the final compounds was

Molecules 2014, 19
10391
checked. Ab initio/DFT calculations of charges in individual structures could provide more detailed
information, nevertheless, such investigation was not the aim of this paper.
The influence of R substituents on lipophilicity (log k) is as follows within ortho-substituted
derivatives: CH3 < F = H < CF3 < OCH3 < Cl < Br < NO2 and as follows within meta- and
para-substituted derivatives: OCH3 ≈ H < F < CH3 < NO2 < Cl < Br < CF3. Within the individual
series the lipophilicity determined by log k values increases for halogens and methyl substituents as
follows: ortho < para < meta; for OCH3 and NO2 as follows: para < meta < ortho. It can be assumed
that log k values specify lipophilicity within individual series of the studied compounds.
Based on the above-mentioned observations, electronic properties of prepared compounds 1–8c
were expressed as polar substituent constants σ* of the whole substituent in position 1 of naphthalene,
i.e., influence of carboxamide moiety and ring-substituted phenyl was included. The individual σ*
parameters were predicted using the ACD/Percepta software; they ranged from 0.26 (1, R = H) to 0.43
(8c, R = 4-NO2).
2.3. In Vitro Antimycobacterial Evaluation
In vitro antimycobacterial screening of all the compounds against Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis was performed, however most compounds did not show any activity (higher than
793 μmol/L). Only the eight compounds presented in Table 1 showed antimycobacterial effectivity.
The antimycobacterial activity was expressed as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that is
defined for mycobacteria as a 90% or greater (IC90) reduction of growth in comparison with the
control. The MIC/IC90 value is routinely and widely used in bacterial assays and is a standard detection
limit according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [47]. N-(2-Methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-
1-carboxamide
(2a),
N-(3-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide
(2b),
N-(3-
methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (3b), N-(4-methylphenyl)-naphthalene-1-carboxamide (3c)
and N-(3-fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (4b) demonstrated two-fold higher activity than
rifampicin and three-fold higher activity than ciprofloxacin.
Figure 2 shows dependence of the antimycobacterial activities expressed as log(1/MIC [mol/L]) on
lipophilicity expressed as log k (Figure 2A), distributive parameter π (Figure 2B) and electronic
properties expressed as polar substituent constants σ* (Figure 2C). When inactive compound 1 (R = H)
was eliminated (marked by cross), the dependences of log(1/MIC) on log k and of log(1/MIC) on σ*
were biphasic: in the range of π from 0.6087 (2b) to 0.8013 (2a), as well as in the range of σ* from
0.29 (2a) to 0.38 (3c) the antimycobacterial activity remained practically constant while a further
increase of log k or σ* resulted in a strong activity decrease. Consequently, it can be concluded that the
lipophilicity of compounds higher than log k = 0.8013 is adverse in terms of antimycobacterial activity;
increased electron-withdrawing properties of the whole substituent in position 1 of naphthalene (expressed
as polar substituent constants σ*) exceeding value σ* = 0.38 are also unfavourable.
When antimycobacterial activities of both series of naphthalene-2-carboxanilides [9] and
naphthalene-1-carboxanilides are compared, it can be stated that the discussed 1-carboxanilides
demonstrated significantly higher activity. Comparison of 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1-carboxanilides [11]
with naphthalene-1-carboxanilides is more complicated. It can be stated that 2-hydroxy derivatives
showed wider spectrum of antimycobacterial effect; nevertheless when MICs of compounds and the

Molecules 2014, 19
10392
standards are compared, it seems that compounds presented herein demonstrated more potent activity.
In general it can be stated that in both series derivatives with lipophilicity log k > 0.6 can show
antimycobacterial effect, and within both series rather meta-substituted derivatives demonstrated
higher activity, which can be connected with the planarity of the structure [9,11,12], nevertheless in
the series of 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1-carboxanilides substituents with significant electron-withdrawing
effect are favoured [11], while among naphthalene-1-carboxanilides rather electron-neutral or slightly
electron-withdrawing substituents are preferable, i.e., phenyl substituents with minimal effect on
electronic density at the carboxamide moiety [10–12].
Figure 2. Dependence of in vitro antimycobacterial activity against Mycobacterium avium
subsp. paratuberculosis log(1/MIC [mol/L]) on lipophilicity expressed as log k (A) or
distributive parameter π (B), as well as polar substituent constants σ* (C) of selected
studied compounds. (π: hydrophobicity contribution of the substituent in position 1 of
naphthalene, σ*: electron properties contribution of the substituent in position 1 of
naphthalene; eliminated compound 1 marked by cross)
B
A
4.5
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.7
4.5
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.7
2b
2a
2a
3c
3b 4b
3c
4b
2b
3b
6c
6c
7c
1
7c
1
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
log k
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
π
1.5
2.0
C
4.5
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.7
2b
3c
2a
3b
4b
6c
7c
1
0.25
0.30
0.35
σ*
0.40
0.45
Of the eight compounds the three with the best efficacy were used to monitor their effect on the
viability of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis CIT03 over a period of five days, see Figure 3. A
concentration range starting at 1,000 µg/mL to 15 µg/mL was used for compounds 2b, 3c, and 4b. The
percent reduction of alamarBlue of these three compounds was compared to an untreated control of
M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and the standards rifampicin and ciprofloxacin. Figure 3A illustrates
the dependence of the percent reduction of alamarBlue of compounds 2b, 3c, and 4b at their MICs
(15 µg/mL, i.e., 54, 57, and 57 µmol/L) on time in comparison with ciprofloxacin (CPX) and
rifampicin (RIF) standards at their MICs (60 and 90 µg/mL, i.e., 181 and 109 µmol/L) and the

Molecules 2014, 19
10393
untreated control of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Figure 3B–D show in detail individual
dependences of the percent reduction of alamarBlue on time (in days) at various concentrations of the
individual compounds (range from 1000 to 15 µg/mL) in comparison with the standards at their MICs.
The percent reduction values for all treated M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis samples were less than
20% over the five-day period of testing. As previously outlined by Carroll et al. [48], percent reduction
values less than 20% indicate insufficient cell metabolism and hence lack of cell viability.
Additionally, a standard MTT assay was performed on these same compounds. The MTT assay is a
well-characterized method of assessing cell growth through measurement of respiration. As such, a
low level of cell viability may suggest inhibition of cell growth through respiratory inhibition [49].
3-Methoxy (2b) and 4-methyl (3c) derivatives showed more than 80% reduction in activity at the
lowest tested concentration (8 µg/mL, i.e., ca. 30 µmol/L) after four hours of incubation, similar to the
reduction observed in the rifampicin and ciprofloxacin standards. Compounds 2a and 4b achieved
similar levels of inhibition at 16 µg/mL (ca. 60 µmol/L) concentration.
Figure 3. Viability of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis expressed as percent reduction of
alamarBlue over a period of five days after treatment with selected studied compounds 2b,
3c, and 4b in comparison with untreated control of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and
standards ciprofloxacin (CPX) and rifampicin (RIF) at their MICs (A). Viability of M.
avium subsp. paratuberculosis expressed as percent reduction of alamarBlue over a period of
five days after treatment with selected studied compounds 2b (B), 3c (C), and 4b (D) at
different concentrations (1,000–15 µg/mL) in comparison with CPX and RIF at their MICs.
B
A
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
2
3
Time [days]
250
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Time [days]
1000
31
500
15
125
CPX
62
untreated
2b
3c
4b
RIF
CPX
RIF
D
C
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
1
2
3
Time [days]
250
4
5
62
1
2
3
Time [days]
250
4
5
1000
31
500
15
125
CPX
1000
31
500
15
125
CPX
62
RIF
RIF

Molecules 2014, 19
10394
Janin mentioned that a similar type of carboxamides can interfere with the mycobacterial proton
pump F0F1H+ATPase or inhibit biosynthesis of amino acids [50]. This hypothesis was confirmed in
recently published papers [3,51,52], where the mechanism of action of bedaquiline (TMC-207, I) and
its naphthalene analogues (II) as potent compounds inhibiting the respiratory chain of mycobacteria is
discussed. Based on structure analogy, the discussed ring-substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides can
be considered as simplified derivatives of bedaquiline and its naphthalene analogues, see Figure 4.
Since the change in colour of alamarBlue is caused by a decrease of mycobacterial cell metabolism, it
is possible that these compounds bind to the mycobacterial respiratory chain components. However,
another possible site of action of the studied compounds in the mycobacteria cannot be excluded.
Figure 4. Structural analogy of the most effective compounds 2a, 2b, 3c, 4b to bedaquiline
(TMC-207, I) and its naphthalene analogues (II) [3,50].
R
OH
N
O
N
OH
Br
N
N
O
bedaquiline (TMC-207, I)
II
O
F
O
O
NH
O
NH
O
NH
O
NH
2b
3c
2a
4b
2.4. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay
The preliminary in vitro screening of cytotoxicity of the most effective antimycobacterial
compounds 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c, and 4b was performed using the human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell
line. The cytotoxicity was evaluated as the LD50 value (LD50-lethal dose to 50% of the cell
population), see Table 1. The discussed anilides 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c and 4b were not soluble at
concentrations above 30 μmol/L in testing medium containing 0.1% DMSO, therefore the highest
available concentration 30.0 μmol/L was used for the toxicity assay. Treatment with 30 μmol/L of 2a,
2b, 3b, 3c, and 4b did not lead to significant lethal effect on THP-1 cells (e.g., LD50 of oxaliplatin and
of camptothecin assessed in this line formerly showed similar values: 1.7 ± 0.64 μmol/L and 0.16 ±
0.07 μmol/L, respectively). Based on these observations it can be concluded that the discussed anilides
with antimycobacterial efficacy are nontoxic [53] and therefore they can be considered as promising
agents for subsequent design of novel antimycobacterial agents.

Molecules 2014, 19
10395
2.5. Inhibition of Photosynthetic Electron Transport (PET) in Spinach Chloroplasts
The evaluated naphthanilide derivatives showed moderate or low inhibition of photosynthetic
electron transport (PET) in isolated spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) chloroplasts compared with the
standard, see Table 1. The PET-inhibiting activity was expressed by IC50 value, i.e., compound
concentration in mol/L causing 50% inhibition of PET. Generally compounds showed poor aqueous
solubility and IC50 values of 1–3a, 4a, 4c, 5a, 6a, and 7a could not be determined due to precipitation
of the compounds during the experiments. From rest twelve compounds compound 7c (R = 4-CF3)
expressed the highest PET-inhibiting activity (IC50 = 59 µmol/L), while compound 8b (R = 3-NO2)
expressed the lowest PET-inhibiting activity (IC50 = 492 µmol/L). However, it could be noted that
limited solubility in tested medium at higher compound concentrations was observed also for 3c, 6b,
6c, 8a, and 8b.
Figure 5. Relationships between PET inhibition log(1/IC50) [mol/L] in isolated spinach
chloroplasts and lipophilicity expressed as log k (A) or distributive parameter π (B), as well
as polar substituent constants σ* (C) of selected studied compounds. (π: hydrophobicity
contribution of the substituent in position 1 of naphthalene, σ*: electron properties
contribution of the substituent in position 1 of naphthalene; eliminated compounds 3c, 6b,
6c, 8a, 8b marked by crosses)
A
B
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
7c
7c
5c
5c
5b
7b
8c
3b
7b
5b
4b
4b
8c
3b
6b
6b
3c
3c
6c
6c
8a
8a
8b
0.7
8b
0.6
0.8
0.9
log k
C
1.0
1.1
1.2
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
π
4.4
7c
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
5c
7b
5b
8c
4b
3b
6b
6c
3c
8a
8b
0.25
0.30
0.35
σ*
0.40
0.45
Dependences of log(1/IC50) on the lipophilicity of compounds expressed as log k (Figure 5A) as
well as distributive parameter π (Figure 5B) and electronic properties expressed as polar substituent
constants σ* (Figure 2C) are presented in Figure 2. When compounds with reduced solubility in tested
medium, namely 3c (R = 4-CH3), 6b,c (R = 3-Br, 4-Br), and 8a,b (R = 2-NO2, 3-NO2) were eliminated
(marked by crosses) the dependence of log(1/IC50 [mol/L]) on log k illustrated for seven compounds

Molecules 2014, 19
10396
(3b, 4b, 5b, 5c, 7b, 7c, 8c) seems to be approximately linear. On the other hand, the dependence of
PET-inhibiting activity on distributive parameter π of the whole substituents in position 1 of
naphthalene showed bilinear dependence, the activity increased up to π = 1.41 (R = 4-CF3, compound 7c)
and further lipophilicity increase resulted in activity decrease. The dependence of PET inhibition on
the electronic properties σ* of the whole substituents in position 1 of naphthalene, showed also
biphasic course with the optimum σ* = 0.41 (compound 7c).
When the PET-inhibiting activity is compared with that of 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1-
carboxanilides [11], it can be stated that 2-hydroxy derivatives showed higher solubility and higher
activity, nevertheless similar relationships between PET inhibition and lipophilicity and electronic
parameters of substituents were observed. Completely different dependences of PET inhibition on
lipophilicity and electronic parameters of substituents were found within the series of naphthalene-2-
carboxanilides [9].
3. Experimental Section
3.1. General
All reagents were purchased from Aldrich. TLC experiments were performed on alumina-backed
silica gel 40 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using chloroform/acetone (2:1) as a mobile phase.
The plates were illuminated under UV (254 nm) and evaluated in iodine vapor. The melting points were
determined on Kofler hot-plate apparatus HMK (Franz Kustner Nacht KG, Dresden, Germany) and are
uncorrected. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Smart MIRacle™ ATR ZnSe for Nicolet™
Impact 410 FT-IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, FL, USA). The spectra were
obtained by accumulation of 256 scans with 2 cm−1 resolution in the region of 4,000–600 cm−1. All 1H
and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz FT-NMR spectrometer
1
(400 MHz for H and 100 MHz for 13C, Bruker Comp., Karlsruhe, Germany). Chemical shifts are
reported in ppm () using internal Si(CH3)4 as the reference with diffuse, easily exchangeable signals
being omitted. Mass spectra were measured using a LTQ Orbitrap Hybrid Mass Spectrometer (Thermo
Electron Corporation, USA) with direct injection into an APCI source (400 °C) in the positive mode.
3.2. Synthesis
General Procedure for Synthesis of Carboxamide Derivatives 1–8c
Method A: Naphthalene-1-carboxylic acid (5.8 mmol) was dissolved in dry hot toluene (40 mL) and
thionyl chloride (8.0 mmol) was added. After 2 h of refluxing, solvent and excessive thionyl chloride
were evaporated under reduced pressure giving napthalene-1-carbonyl chloride as colourless liquid in
quantitative yield. The product forms colourless needles after cooling. Mp. 18–19 °C (26 °C [54]).
Naphthalene-1-carbonyl chloride (5.8 mmol), triethylamine (8.7 mmol) and corresponding substituted
aniline (5.8 mmol) were dissolved in dry dichloromethane (30 mL) and the mixture was stirred for 12 h at
ambient temperature. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, the solid residue washed
with 10% HCl, and the crude product was recrystallized from propan-2-ol with addition of active carbon.

Molecules 2014, 19
10397
Method B: Naphthalene-1-carboxylic acid (5.8 mmol) and the corresponding substituted aniline
(5.8 mmol) were suspended in dry chlorobenzene (25 mL). Phosphorous trichloride (2.9 mmol) was
added dropwise, and the reacting mixture was heated in the microwave reactor at maximal allowed
power 500 W and 130 °C, using infrared flask-surface control of temperature, for 15 min. The solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure, the solid residue washed with 2 M HCl, and the crude product
was recrystallized from propan-2-ol with addition of active carbon.
N-Phenylnaphthalene-1-carboxamide (1). Method B; Yield 46%; Mp. 164 °C (164–165°C [55],
163 °C [56], 160 °C [57]); Rf = 0.87; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3281m, 3045w, 1650s, 1594s, 1520s, 1499s,
1433s, 1312m, 1253m, 1078s, 781s, 770s, 744s, 686m; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [55,58,59], δ: 10.58 (s, 1H),
8.22–8.17 (m, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.00 (m, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d,
J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.58 (m, 3H), 7.38 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (td, J = 7.3 Hz, J = 0.7 Hz, 1H);
13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.14, 139.17, 134.73, 133.04, 129.86, 129.57, 128.51, 128.13, 126.76,
126.14, 125.21, 124.96, 124.83, 123.51, 119.80; HR-MS: for C17H14NO [M+H]+ calculated
248.1070 m/z, found 248.1079 m/z.
N-(2-Methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (2a). Method A; Yield 89%; Mp. 117 °C; Rf = 0.72;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3321m, 3042w, 1651s, 1591m, 1505m, 1486s, 1456s, 1429m, 1259m, 1250m,
1220m, 1112m, 1043m, 1026s, 901m, 813m, 802m, 785s, 760s, 738m, 723m; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ:
9.60 (s, 1H), 8.32–8.27 (m, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.04–7.99 (m, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H),
7.77 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.09 (m, 2H), 7.01 (td, J = 7.5 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H),
3.83 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.12, 151.25, 134.51, 133.10, 129.99, 129.70, 128.14,
126.96, 126.73, 126.15, 125.59, 125.27, 125.15, 124.89, 123.83, 120.16, 111.50, 55.69; HR-MS: for
C18H16NO2 [M+H]+ calculated 278.1176 m/z, found 278.1181 m/z.
N-(3-Methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (2b). Method A; Yield 93%; Mp. 161 °C; Rf = 0.69;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3280m, 3046w, 2966w, 1648s, 1592s, 1538s, 1493m, 1327m, 1307s, 1251s,
1
1027m, 845s, 815m, 776s, 736m, 726m, 688s; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.57 (s, 1H), 8.20–8.15 (m,
1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.00 (m, 1H), 7.74 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H); 7.65–7.57 (m,
3H), 7.53 (t, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.40–7.31 (m, 1H), 7.27 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (ddd, J = 8.1 Hz,
13
J = 2.6 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H); 3.76 (s, 3H); C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.23, 159.47, 140.39, 134.71,
133.07, 129.96, 129.57, 129.37, 128.20, 126.85, 126.23, 125.27, 124.99, 124.89, 112.09, 109.11,
105.67, 54.96; HR-MS: for C18H16NO2 [M+H]+ calculated 278.1176 m/z, found 278.1181 m/z.
N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (2c). Method A; Yield 91%; Mp. 177 °C; Rf = 0.66;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3227m, 3125w, 3050w, 1647s, 1603s, 1506s, 1469m, 1414m, 1327m, 1227m,
1
1180m, 1030m, 1026m, 834m, 821m, 799s, 777s, 747s, 730m; H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [58], δ: 10.45 (s,
1H), 8.22–8.17 (m, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.00 (0, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d,
13
J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.64–7.57 (m, 3H), 6.96 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H); C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ:
166.74, 155.51, 134.88, 133.07, 132.37, 129.78, 129.63, 128.16, 126.75, 126.17, 125.17, 125.07,
124.89, 121.33, 113.77, 55.14; HR-MS: for C18H16NO2 [M+H]+ calculated 278.1176 m/z, found
278.1177 m/z.

Molecules 2014, 19
10398
N-(2-Methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (3a). Method B; Yield 76%; Mp. 187 °C; Rf = 0.70;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3267m, 3046w, 1642s, 1572s, 1524s, 1456s, 1303m, 1258m, 718s, 771s, 747s,
1
736s; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.06 (s, 1H), 8.32–8.28 (m, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01
(m, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.50 (m, 4H), 7.32–7.15 (m, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR
(DMSO-d6), δ: 167.35, 136.23, 134.64, 133.15, 133.4, 130.31, 129.93, 129.81, 128.22, 126.81, 126.24,
126.23, 125.96, 125.87, 125.38, 125.18, 124.96, 17.96; HR-MS: for C18H16NO [M+H]+ calculated
262.1226 m/z, found 262.1231 m/z.
N-(3-Methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (3b). Method A; Yield 88%; Mp. 162 °C; Rf = 0.69;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3227m, 3133w, 3053w, 1651s, 1593s, 1538s, 1428m, 1305m, 1266m, 1252m,
1206w, 805m, 776s, 745s, 734s, 691s; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.52 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.17 (m, 1H), 8.08
(d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.76–7.58 (m, 4H), 7.26 (t,
J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.33 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.15, 139.13, 137.76,
134.82, 133.07, 129.87, 129.60, 128.40, 128.17, 126.81, 126.18, 125.21, 125.02, 124.89, 124.27,
120.34, 117.03, 21.10; HR-MS: for C18H16NO [M+H]+ calculated 262.1226 m/z, found 262.1230 m/z.
N-(4-Methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (3c). Method A; Yield 95%; Mp. 196 °C (183 °C [56],
190–193 °C [60], 187–189 °C [61]; Rf = 0.69; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3227m, 3180w, 3111w, 3031w,
2909w, 1651s, 1598s, 1532s, 1514s, 1404m, 1322s, 1301m, 1257m, 817m, 805s, 778s, 747s, 730m;
1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [58,59], δ: 10.51 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.16 (m, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.00
(m, 1H), 7.74 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.64–7.55 (m, 3H), 7.18 (d,
J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 2.30 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 166.97, 136.70, 134.83, 133.06, 132.53,
129.83, 129.61, 128.93, 128.16, 126.78, 126.17, 125.20, 125.03, 124.88, 119.81, 20.35; HR-MS: for
C18H16NO [M+H]+ calculated 262.1226 m/z, found 262.1232 m/z.
N-(2-Fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (4a). Method A; Yield 94%; Mp. 141 °C (Mp.
137–138 °C [62]); Rf = 0.69; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3172m, 3118w, 3013w, 1656s, 1530s, 1498s,
1
1450s, 1313s, 1291s, 1261s, 1106m, 804m, 781s, 754s; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.38 (s, 1H),
8.29–8.24 (m, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.00 (m, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.79–7.74
(m, 1H), 7.65–7.55 (m, 3H), 7.39–7.23 (m, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.39, 155.33 (d,
J = 245.8 Hz), 133.94, 133.07, 130.16, 129.70, 128.19, 126.84, 126.64 (d, J = 7.6 Hz), 126.45 (d,
J = 2.3 Hz), 126.20, 125.64 (d, J = 12.2 Hz), 125.52, 125.03, 124.85, 124.21 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 115.68 (d,
J = 19.7 Hz); HR-MS: for C17H13NOF [M+H]+ calculated 266.0976 m/z, found 266.0982 m/z.
N-(3-Fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (4b). Method A; Yield 96%; Mp. 150 °C; Rf = 0.68;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3277m, 3039w, 1651s, 1611s, 1592s, 1522s, 1484m, 1414m, 1391m, 1249m,
1
1148m, 1129m, 855m, 770s, 676m; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.80 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.16 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.00 (m, 1H), 7.85–87.76 (m, 2H), 7.66–7.54 (m, 4H), 7.47–7.36 (m, 1H), 6.96
(tdd, J = 8.4 Hz, J = 2.6 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.42, 162.05 (d,
J = 239.7 Hz), 140.90 (d, J = 10.7 Hz), 134.29, 133.06, 130.22 (d, J = 9.1 Hz), 130.19, 129.51, 128.22,
126.96, 126.29, 125.44, 124.91, 124.88, 115.49 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 110.03 (d, J = 21.3 Hz), 106.50 (d,
J = 25.8 Hz); HR-MS: for C17H13NOF [M+H]+ calculated 266.0976 m/z, found 266.0981 m/z.

Molecules 2014, 19
10399
N-(4-Fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (4c). Method A; Yield 78%; Mp. 185 °C; Rf = 0.69;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3284m, 3046w, 1648s, 1521s, 1505s, 1404s, 1390s, 1308m, 1206m, 1097m,
1
826s, 807s, 778s, 760m, 701m; H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [58,59], δ: 10.66 (s, 1H), 8.22–8.17 (m, 1H),
8.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.86–7.81 (m, 2H), 7.77 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H),
7.65–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.23 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.08, 158.21 (d,
J = 238.2 Hz), 135.58 (d, J = 2.3 Hz), 134.54, 133.07, 130.01, 129.57, 128.20, 126.87, 126.23, 125.32,
125.00, 124.89, 121.57 (d, J = 7.6 Hz), 115.15 (d, J = 22.0 Hz); HR-MS: for C17H13NOF [M+H]+
calculated 266.0976 m/z, found 266.0981 m/z.
N-(2-Chlorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (5a). Method A; Yield 83%; Mp. 157 °C (Mp.
154–156 °C [63]); Rf = 0.72; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3263m, 3046w, 1648s, 1581s, 1520s, 1505s,
1
1475m, 1439m, 1301s, 1253m, 1059m, 815m, 786s, 777s, 743s; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.30 (s,
1H), 8.37–8.32 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H),
7.76–7.57 (m, 5H), 7.43 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H);
13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.38, 134.85, 133.91, 133.10, 130.24, 129.73, 129.49, 129.16, 128.17,
128.14, 127.39, 127.38, 126.84, 126.23, 125.59, 125.15, 124.86; HR-MS: for C17H13NOCl [M+H]+
calculated 282.0680 m/z, found 282.0685 m/z.
N-(3-Chlorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (5b). Method A; Yield 87%; Mp. 144 °C; Rf = 0.71;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3270m, 3050w, 1647s, 1585s, 1524s, 1478s, 1304s, 1249s, 863m, 775s, 744m,
682s; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.78 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.16 (m, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01 (m,
2H), 7.78 (dd, J = 7.2 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.63–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.41 (t, J = 8.0 Hz,
13
1H), 7.20 (ddd, J = 7.7 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 0.7 Hz, 1H); C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.44, 140.63,
134.23, 133.07, 132.98, 130.30, 130.22, 129.51, 128.23, 126.97, 126.29, 125.46, 124.92, 124.88, 123.29,
119.25, 118.16; HR-MS: for C17H13NOCl [M+H]+ calculated 282.0680 m/z, found 282.0685 m/z.
N-(4-Chlorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (5c). Method A; Yield 90%; Mp. 182 °C; Rf = 0.72;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3270m, 3042w, 1647s, 1590s, 1514s, 1489s, 1389m, 1310m, 1092m, 1014m,
1
820s, 809m, 783s, 774s, 709m; H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [58,59], δ: 10.73 (s, 1H), 8.20–8.15 (m, 1H),
8.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (dd, J = 8.1 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz,
13
1H), 7.65–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.44 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H); C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.24, 138.14, 134.38,
133.06, 130.11, 129.52, 128.49, 128.22, 127.22, 126.91, 126.26, 125.40, 124.94, 124.88, 121.31;
HR-MS: for C17H13NOCl [M+H]+ calculated 282.0680 m/z, found 282.0685 m/z.
N-(2-Bromophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (6a) Method A; Yield 79%; Mp. 155 °C (Mp.
147–150 °C [62], 149 °C [64]); Rf = 0.73; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3256m, 3042w, 1647s, 1575m,
1520s, 1471m, 1432m, 1299m, 1253m, 1026m, 784s, 774s, 742s, 734s; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.27
(s, 1H), 8.41–8.36 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.06–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H),
7.83–7.60 (m, 5H), 7.48 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H);
13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.29, 136.27, 133.88, 133.10, 132.62, 130.24, 129.73, 128.64, 128.14,
128.01, 127.85, 126.79, 126.21, 125.55, 125.23, 124.82, 120.21; HR-MS: for C17H13NOBr [M+H]+
calculated 326.0175 m/z, found 326.0183 m/z.

Molecules 2014, 19
10400
N-(3-Bromophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (6b). Method A; Yield 90%; Mp. 152 °C; Rf = 0.71;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3266m, 3042w, 1647s, 1575m, 1520s, 1471s, 1432s, 1299s, 1253m, 1026m,
1
784s, 774s, 742s, 734s; H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [59], δ: 10.77 (s, 1H), 8.21–8.16 (m, 2H), 8.11 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.78 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.74–7.71 (m, 1H),
7.66–7.56 (m, 3H), 7.40–7.33 (m, 2H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.41, 140.77, 134.20, 133.06,
130.58, 130.22, 129.51, 128.22, 126.97, 126.29, 126.18, 125.46, 124.91, 124.86, 122.10, 121.42,
118.54; HR-MS: for C17H13NOBr [M+H]+ calculated 326.0175 m/z, found 326.0183 m/z.
N-(4-Bromophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (6c). Method A; Yield 84%; Mp. 195 °C; Rf = 0.72;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3216m, 3162w, 3100w, 3028w, 1648s, 1532m, 1486s, 1390m, 1318m, 1255m,
1070m, 1010m, 814s, 788s, 774s, 742m, 726m; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [59], δ: 10.73 (s, 1H), 8.22–8.14
(m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.06–7.99 (m, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.0 Hz,
13
1H), 7.66–7.56 (m, 3H) 7.57 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H); C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 168.26, 138.55, 134.35,
133.06, 131.40, 130.13, 129.51, 128.20, 126.91, 126.24, 125.40, 124.92, 124.86, 121.69, 115.23;
HR-MS: for C17H13NOBr [M+H]+ calculated 326.0175 m/z, found 326.0184 m/z.
N-[2-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]naphthalene-1-carboxamide (7a). Method B; Yield 74%; Mp. 151 °C;
Rf = 0.87; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3249s, 3050w, 2999w, 1651s, 1585m, 1520s, 1452s, 1418s, 1297s,
1256s, 1170s, 1110s, 1058s, 1036s, 910m, 797m, 778s, 764s, 726m; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.38 (s,
1H), 8.33–8.28 (m, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.82–7.76 (m, 3H), 7.72–7.58 (m,
5H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 168.29, 135.46 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 133.80, 133.15, 133.14, 131.16, 130.27,
129.73, 128.22, 127.43, 126.85, 126.45 (q, J = 4.6 Hz), 126.29, 126.16 (q, J = 29.6 Hz), 125.44,
125.14, 124.89, 123.70 (q, J = 276.2 Hz); HR-MS: for C18H13NOF3 [M+H]+ calculated 316.0944 m/z,
found 316.0953 m/z.
N-[3-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]naphthalene-1-carboxamide (7b). Method B; Yield 78%; Mp. 148 °C;
Rf = 0.87; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3267m, 3046w, 1647s, 1529s, 1489s, 1330s, 1306s, 1254m, 1230m,
1162s, 1131s, 1115s, 1094s, 1065s, 1012w, 929m, 880s, 793s, 780s, 744s, 698m; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ: 10.29 (s, 1H), 8.35 (s, 1H), 8.24–8.19 (m, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.10–8.01 (m, 2H), 7.81 (d,
J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.59 (m, 4H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.65, 139.99,
134.09, 133.10, 130.39, 129.90, 129.54, 129.45 (q, J = 31.9 Hz), 128.29, 127.06, 126.37, 125.62,
124.97, 124.91, 124.10 (q, J = 270.9 Hz), 123.30, 119.94 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 115.83 (q, J = 3.3 Hz);
HR-MS: for C18H13NOF3 [M+H]+ calculated 316.0944 m/z, found 316.0953 m/z.
N-[4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl]naphthalene-1-carboxamide (7c). Method B; Yield 68%; Mp. 193 °C;
Rf = 0.88; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3299m, 1657s, 1613m, 1597m, 1522s, 1511s, 1407m, 1328s, 1315s,
1
1253m, 1155s, 1109s, 1067s, 1018s, 904m, 834s, 789m, 777s, 756m; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.95
(s, 1H), 8.21–8.16 (m, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.09–8.02 (m, 3H), 7.83–7.74 (m, 3H), 7.67–7.59
13
(m, 3H); C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.70, 142.80, 134.12, 133.10, 130.39, 129.52, 128.31, 127.08,
126.37, 125.96 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 125.64, 124.93, 124.92, 124.36 (q, J = 269.6 Hz), 123.67 (q,
J = 31.9 Hz), 119.68; HR-MS: for C18H13NOF3 [M+H]+ calculated 316.0944 m/z, found 316.0952 m/z.

Molecules 2014, 19
10401
N-(2-Nitrophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (8a). Method B; Yield 43%; Mp. 98 °C (Mp.
138–139 °C [59]); Rf = 0.87; IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3333m, 1677s, 1608m, 1584s, 1495s, 1418s,
1
1336s, 1272s, 897m, 779s, 727s; H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 11.00 (s, 1H), 8.33–8.28 (m, 1H), 8.14 (d,
J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.07–8.02 (m, 2H), 7.85 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.79–7.60 (m, 5H), 7.46 (td,
J = 7.5 Hz, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.12, 143.21, 133.88, 133.16, 133.12, 131.01,
130.89, 129.70, 128.31, 127.09, 126.43, 125.97, 125.93, 125.73, 124.99, 124.92, 124.85; HR-MS: for
C17H13N2O3 [M+H]+ calculated 293.0921 m/z, found 293.0925 m/z.
N-(3-Nitrophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (8b). Method A; Yield 79%; Mp. 172–175 °C; Rf = 0.87;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3278m, 3093w, 3045w, 1647s, 1526s, 1423m, 1340s, 1325s, 1290s, 1256s, 902m,
881s, 834m, 806s, 777s, 735s; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [59], δ: 11.08 (s, 1H), 8.89 (t, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.25–
8.20 (m, 1H), 8.16–8.11 (m, 2H), 8.07–7.97 (m, 2H), 7.84 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (t, J =
8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.59 (m, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.74, 147.97, 140.34, 133.85, 133.12,
130.54, 130.10, 129.52, 128.32, 127.13, 126.41, 125.75, 125.74, 124.93, 124.92, 118.14, 113.88; HR-
MS: for C17H13N2O3 [M+H]+ calculated 293.0921 m/z, found 293.0931 m/z.
N-(4-Nitrophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (8c). Method B; Yield 60%; Mp. 213–215 °C; Rf = 0.87;
IR (Zn/Se ATR, cm−1): 3195m, 3046w, 1655s, 1613m, 1593s, 1552s, 1504s, 1407s, 1327s, 1305s,
1260s, 1107s, 856s, 845s, 821s, 766s, 749s, 686s; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6) [59], δ: 11.20 (s, 1H), 8.31 (d,
J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 8.21–8.15 (m, 2H), 8.08 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 8.05–8.02 (m, 1H), 7.84 (dd, J = 7.0 Hz,
J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.68–7.59 (m, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 167.85, 145.36, 142.51, 133.71, 133.09,
130.65, 129.46, 128.34, 127.19, 126.41, 125.85, 124.89, 124.82, 124.81, 119.48; HR-MS: for
C17H13N2O3 [M+H]+ calculated 293.0921 m/z, found 293.0926 m/z.
3.3. Lipophilicity Determination Using HPLC (Capacity Factor k /Calculated log k)
A HPLC system Agilent 1200 equipped with DAD detector (Agilent, USA) was used. A
chromatographic column Symmetry® C18 5 μm, 4.6  250 mm, Part No. WAT054275 (Waters Corp.,
Milford, MA, USA) was used. The HPLC separation process was monitored and evaluated by
EZChrom Elite software ver. 3.3.2 (Agilent, USA). Isocratic elution by a mixture of MeOH p.a. (60%)
and H2O-HPLC Mili-Q grade (40%) as a mobile phase was used. The total flow of the column was
1.0 mL/min, injection 20 μL, column temperature 40 °C, and sample temperature 10 °C. The detection
wavelength 210 nm was chosen. The KI methanolic solution was used for the dead time (tD)
determination. Retention times (tR) were measured in minutes. The capacity factors k were calculated
according to formula k = (tR − tD)/tD, where tR is the retention time of the solute, whereas tD denotes the
dead time obtained using an unretained analyte. Log k, calculated from the capacity factor k, is used as
the lipophilicity index converted to log P scale. The log k values of individual compounds are shown
in Table 1.
3.4. In Vitro Antimycobacterial Evaluation
A well-characterized clinical isolate of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (CIT03) was
grown in Middlebrook broth (MB), supplemented with Oleic-Albumin-Dextrose-Catalase supplement

Molecules 2014, 19
10402
(OADC, Becton, Dickinson and Comp., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and mycobactin J (2 µg/mL).
Identification of this isolate was performed using biochemical and molecular protocols. At log phase
growth, a culture sample (10 mL) was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm/20 min using a bench top centrifuge
(Model CR 4-12, Jouan Inc., Winchester, VA, USA). Following removal of the supernatant, the pellet
was washed in fresh Middlebrook 7H9GC broth and re-suspended in fresh supplemented MB (10 mL).
The turbidity was adjusted to match McFarland standard No. 1 (3 × 108 cfu) with MB broth. A further
1:20 dilution of the culture was then performed in MB broth. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the
mycobacterial species was investigated in a 96-well plate format. In these experiments, sterile
deionized water (300 µL) was added to all outer-perimeter wells of the plates to minimize evaporation
of the medium in the test wells during incubation. Each evaluated compound (100 µL) was incubated
with the mycobacterial species (100 µL). Dilutions of each compound were prepared in duplicate. For
all synthesized compounds, final concentrations ranged from 1,000 µg/mL to 8 µg/mL. All compounds
were prepared in DMSO and subsequent dilutions were made in supplemented MB. The plates were
sealed with parafilm and incubated at 37 °C for 11 days.
Following incubation, a 10% addition of alamarBlue (AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK) was mixed
into each well and readings at 570 nm and 600 nm were taken, initially for background subtraction and
subsequently after 24 h re-incubation. The background subtraction is necessary for strongly coloured
compounds, where the colour may interfere with the interpretation of any colour change. For
non-interfering compounds, a blue colour in the well was interpreted as an absence of growth and a
pink colour was scored as growth. Furthermore percent reduction of alamarBlue was calculated to
generate quantitative data on cell viability during exposure to antimycobacterial compounds over a
period of 5 days. The formula used to determine percent reduction of alamarBlue has been
standardized for colorimetric analysis by Abd Serotec.
For the MTT assay, the same 96-well plate set up and incubation conditions listed above were used.
After the incubation period, a 10% addition of MTT reagent was mixed into each well and incubated at
37 °C for 4 h. The reagent and media were then aspirated from the wells to which 50 µL DMSO was
then added and plates were read at 550 nm.
The actimycobacterial activity was expressed as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that
is defined for mycobacteria as a 90% or greater (IC90) reduction of growth in comparison with the
control. The MIC value is routinely and widely used in bacterial assays and is a standard detection
limit according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [47]. Isoniazid, rifampicin and
ciprofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as reference antimycobacterial drugs. The results are
summarized in Table 1.
3.5. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay
Human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cells were obtained from the European Collection of Cell
Cultures (ECACC, Salisbury, UK; Methods of characterization: DNA Fingerprinting (Multilocus
probes) and isoenzyme analysis). These cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 (Lonza, Verviers,
Belgium) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO,
USA), 2% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Lonza) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were
passaged at approximately one-week intervals. Cells were routinely tested for the absence of

Molecules 2014, 19
10403
mycoplasma (Hoechst 33258 staining method). The tested compounds were dissolved in DMSO
(Sigma-Aldrich) and added in five increasing concentrations to the cell suspension in the culture
medium. The maximum concentration of DMSO in the assays never exceeded 0.1%. Subsequently, the
cells were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2 to various compound concentrations ranging from
0.37 to 20 μmol/L in RPMI 1640 medium. Cell toxicity was determined using a Cytotoxicity Detection
KitPLUS Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according
to the manufacturer’s instructions, as described previously [10–13]. For LDH assays, cells were seeded
into 96-well plates (5 × 104 cells/well in 100 μL culture medium) in triplicate in serum-free RPMI
1640 medium, and measurements at 492 nm wavelength (Synergy 2 Multi-Mode Microplate Reader,
BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) were taken 24 h after the treatment with tested compounds. The median
lethal dose values, LD50, were deduced through the production of a dose-response curve. All data were
evaluated using GraphPad Prism 5.00 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The
results are summarized in Table 1.
LDH Test Principle: The LDH activity is determined by a coupled enzymatic reaction, whereby the
tetrazolium salt INT is reduced to formazan. An increase in the amount of dead or plasma membrane
damaged cells results in an increase of LDH enzyme activity in the culture supernatant. This increase
in the amount of enzyme activity in the supernatant directly correlates to the amount of formazan
formed during a limited time period. The formazan dye formed is water soluble and shows a broad
absorption maximum at approximately 500 nm.
3.6. Study of Inhibition Photosynthetic Electron Transport (PET) in Spinach Chloroplasts
Chloroplasts were prepared from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) according to Masarovicova and
Kralova [65]. The inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport (PET) in isolated spinach
chloroplasts was determined spectrophotometrically (Genesys 6, Thermo Scientific, USA), using an
artificial electron acceptor 2,6-dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCIPP) according to Kralova et al. [66],
and the rate of photosynthetic electron transport was monitored as a photoreduction of DCPIP. The
measurements were carried out in phosphate buffer (0.02 mol/L, pH 7.2) containing sucrose (0.4 mol/L),
MgCl2 (0.005 mol/L) and NaCl (0.015 mol/L). The chlorophyll content was 30 mg/L in these
experiments and the samples were irradiated (~100 W/m2 with 10 cm distance) with a halogen lamp
(250 W) using a 4 cm water filter to prevent warming of the samples (suspension temperature 22 °C).
The studied compounds were dissolved in DMSO due to their limited water solubility. The applied
DMSO concentration (up to 4%) practically did not affect the photochemical activity in isolated
spinach chloroplasts (observed differences in DCPIP photoreduction due DMSO addition were within
experimental error). The inhibitory efficiency of the studied compounds was expressed by IC50 values,
i.e., by molar concentration of the compounds causing 50% decrease in the oxygen evolution rate
relative to the untreated control. The comparable IC50 value for a selective herbicide 3-(3,4-
dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, DCMU (Diuron®) was about 1.9 μmol/L. The results are
summarized in Table 1.

Molecules 2014, 19
10404
4. Conclusions
A series of twenty-two substituted naphthalene-1-carboxanilides were prepared and characterized.
The prepared compounds were tested for their antimycobacterial activity against clinical isolate of
Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and for their ability to inhibit photosynthetic electron
transport (PET) in isolated spinach chloroplasts (Spinacia oleracea L.). Generally compounds showed
poor aqueous solubility, which significantly reduced their biological effect. Five compounds,
N-(2-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (2a), N-(3-methoxyphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide
(2b), N-(3-methylphenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (3b), N-(4-methylphenyl)-naphthalene-1-
carboxamide (3c) and N-(3-fluorophenyl)naphthalene-1-carboxamide (4b) showed antimycobacterial
activity two-fold higher than rifampicin and three-fold higher activity than ciprofloxacin. It was found
that dependence of the antimycobacterial activities on lipophilicity and electronic properties were
bilinear. Based on the results of the MTT assay of the most efficient compounds 2a, 2b, 3c, and 4b it
seems that they could influence the mycobacterial respiratory chain. The most effective antimycobacterial
compounds 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c and 4b were tested for their in vitro cytotoxicity against THP-1 cells
and within this preliminary screening they demonstrated insignificant toxicity. Based on these facts, it
can be concluded that the discussed anilides can be considered as promising agents for subsequent
design of novel antimycobacterial agents. The PET-inhibiting activity was rather moderate or low,
the most active compound N-[4-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]naphthalene-1-carboxamide (7c) expressed
IC50 = 59 μmol/L.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the IGA VFU Brno 37/2014/FaF, by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA
1/0612/11, by the Projects APVV-0061-11, CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0053, CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0073 and by
the Irish Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food (FIRM) 08RDCIT601 & 08RDCIT617.
Author Contributions
Tomas Gonec, Jiri Kos, Josef Jampilek—design, synthesis of the compounds, SAR, writing of the
paper. Jan Tengler, Michal Oravec—analysis/characterization of the compounds. Eoghan Nevin,
Rodney Govender, Jim O’Mahony, Aidan Coffey—antimycobacterial evaluation of the compounds,
writing of the paper. Matus Pesko, Katarina Kralova—study of PET inhibition in spinach chloroplasts
of the compounds, writing of the paper. Ivan Kushkevych, Vendula Stastna, Peter Kollar—evaluation
of cytotoxicity of the compounds.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2013; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland,
2013.

Molecules 2014, 19
10405
2. Wagner, D.; Young, L.S. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections: A clinical review. Infection
2004, 32, 257–270.
3. Koul, A.; Arnoult, E.; Lounis, N.; Guillemont, J.; Andries, K. The challenge of new drug
discovery for tuberculosis. Nature 2011, 469, 483–490.
4. Shaner, D.L. Herbicide safety relative to common targets in plants and mammals. Pest. Manag. Sci.
2004, 60, 17–24.
5. Delaney, J.; Clarke, E.; Hughes, D.; Rice, M. Modern agrochemical research: A missed
opportunity for drug discovery? Drug Discov. Today 2006, 11, 839–845.
6. Duke, S.O. Herbicide and pharmaceutical relationships. Weed Sci. 2010, 58, 334–339.
7. Dolezal, M.; Cmedlova, P.; Palek, L.; Vinsova, J.; Kunes, J.; Buchta, V.; Jampilek, J.; Kralova, K.
Synthesis and antimycobacterial evaluation of substituted pyrazinecarboxamides. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 43, 1105–1113.
8. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Kralova, K.; Vejsova, M.; Stolarikova, J.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J.
Investigating spectrum of biological activity of 4- and 5-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-[2-(arylamino)-1-
alkyl-2-oxoethyl]benzamides. Molecules 2011, 16, 2414–2430.
9. Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Sujan, J.; Pesko, M.; Guo, J.; Kralova, K.; Pavlacka, L.; Vesely, L.;
Kreckova, E.; Kos, J.; et al. Investigating the spectrum of biological activity of substituted
quinoline-2-caboxamides and their isosteres. Molecules 2012, 17, 613–644.
10. Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Tengler, J.; Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Kauerova, T.;
Oravec, M.; Kollar, P.; et al. Antibacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted
3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides. Molecules 2013, 18, 7977–7997.
11. Gonec, T.; Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Govender, R.; Keltosova, S.; Chambel, B.; Pereira, D.;
Kollar, P.; Imramovsky, A.; et al. Antibacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted
2-hydroxynaphthalene-1-carboxanilides. Molecules 2013, 18, 9397–9419.
12. Gonec, T.; Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Tengler, J.; Bobal, P.; Kollar, P.;
Cizek, A.; Kralova, K.; et al. Antimycobacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted
1-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6531–6541.
13. Fajkusova, D.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Guo, J.; Oktabec, Z.; Vejsova, M.; Kollar, P.; Coffey, A.;
Csollei, J.; Kralova, K.; et al. Anti-infective and herbicidal activity of N-substituted
2-aminobenzothiazoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 7059–7068.
14. Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Cizmarik, J. Inhibitory effect of piperidinoethylesters of
alkoxyphenylcarbamic acids on photosynthesis. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 1992, 11, 261–267.
15. Kralova, K.; Bujdakova, H.; Kuchta, T.; Loos, D. Correlation between biological activity and the
structure of 6-amino-2-R-thiobenzothiazoles. Anti-yeast activity and inhibition of photochemical
activity of chloroplasts. Pharmazie 1994, 49, 460–461.
16. Kralova, K.; Kallova, J.; Loos, D.; Devinsky, F. Correlation between biological activity and the
structure of N,N'-bis(alkyldimethyl)-1,6-hexanediammonium dibromides. Antibacterial activity
and inhibition of photochemical activity of chloroplasts. Pharmazie 1994, 49, 857–858.
17. Bujdakova, H.; Kralova, K.; Sidoova, E. Antifungal and antialgal activity of 3-(2-alkylthio-6-
benzothiazolylaminomethyl)-2-benzoxazolinethiones. Pharmazie 1995, 50, 156–156.
18. Kralova, K.; Bujdakova, H.; Cizmarik, J. Antifungal and antialgal activity of piperidinopropyl
esters of alkoxy substituted phenylcarbamic acids. Pharmazie 1995, 50, 440–441.

Molecules 2014, 19
10406
19. Laursen, J.S.; Engel-Andreasen, J.; Fristrup, P.; Harris, P.; Olsen, C.A. Cis-trans amide bond
rotamers in β-peptoids and peptoids: Evaluation of stereoelectronic effects in backbone and side
chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2835–2844.
20. Pattabiraman, V.R.; Bode, J.W. Rethinking amide bond synthesis. Nature 2011, 480, 471–479.
21. Roth, H.J.; Fenner, H. Arzneistoffe, 3rd ed.; Deutscher Apotheker Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany,
2000; pp. 51–114.
22. Sinning, C.; Watzer, B.; de Petrocellis, L.; di Marzo, V.; Imming, P. Dopamides, vanillylamides,
ethanolamides, and arachidonic acid amides of anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug substances
as TRPV1 ligands. Chem. Med. Chem. 2008, 3, 1956–1964.
23. Good, N.E. Inhibitors of the Hill reaction. Plant Physiol. 1961, 36, 788–803.
24. Musiol, R.; Tabak, D.; Niedbala, H.; Podeszwa, B.; Jampilek, J.; Kralova, K.; Dohnal, J.; Finster, J.;
Mencel, A.; Polanski, J. Investigating biological activity spectrum for novel quinoline analogues
2: Hydroxyquinolinecarboxamides with photosynthesis inhibiting activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2008, 16, 4490–4499.
25. Imramovsky, A.; Vinsova, J.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Dolezal, R.; Jampilek, J.; Kaustova, J.; Kunc, F.
New antituberculotics originated from salicylanilides with promising in vitro activity against
atypical mycobacterial strains. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 3572–3579.
26. Otevrel, J.; Mandelova, Z.; Pesko, M.; Guo, J.; Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Vejsova, M.; Kalinowski, D.;
Kovacevic, Z.; Coffey, A.; et al. Investigating the spectrum of biological activity of ring-
substituted salicylanilides and carbamoylphenylcarbamates. Molecules 2010, 15, 8122–8142.
27. Imramovsky, A.; Pesko, M.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Kralova, K.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J.
Photosynthesis-inhibiting efficiency of 4-chloro-2-(chlorophenylcarbamoyl)phenyl alkyl-carbamates.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4564–4567.
28. Pauk, K.; Zadrazilova, I.; Imramovsky, A.; Vinsova, J.; Pokorna, M.; Masarikova, M.; Cizek, A.;
Jampilek, J. New derivatives of salicylamides: Preparation and antimicrobial activity against
various bacterial species. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6574–6581.
29. Andries, K.; Verhasselt, P.; Guillemont, J.; Gohlmann, H.W.; Neefs, J.M.; Winkler, H.;
van Gestel, J.; Timmerman, P.; Zhu, M.; Lee, E.; et al. A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP
synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 2005, 307, 223–227.
30. Jampilek, J.; Dolezal, M.; Kunes, J.; Buchta, V.; Kralova, K. Quinaldine derivatives: Preparation
and biological activity. Med. Chem. 2005, 1, 591–599.
31. Musiol, R.; Jampilek, J.; Buchta, V.; Niedbala, H.; Podeszwa, B.; Palka, A.; Majerz-Maniecka, K.;
Oleksyn, B.; Polanski, J. Antifungal properties of new series of quinoline derivatives. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 3592–3598.
32. Musiol, R.; Jampilek, J.; Kralova, K.; Richardson, D.R.; Kalinowski, D.; Podeszwa, B.; Finster, J.;
Niedbala, H.; Palka, A.; Polanski, J. Investigating biological activity spectrum for novel quinoline
analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 1280–1288.
33. Podeszwa, B.; Niedbala, H.; Polanski, J.; Musiol, R.; Tabak, D.; Finster, J.; Serafin, K.; Wietrzyk, J.;
Boryczka, S.; Mol, W.; et al. Investigating the antiproliferative activity of quinoline-5,8-dione
analogues on tumour cell lines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6138–6141.

Molecules 2014, 19
10407
34. Jampilek, J.; Musiol, R.; Finster, J.; Pesko, M.; Carroll, J.; Kralova, K.; Vejsova, M.; Coffey, A.;
Polanski, J. Investigating biological activity spectrum for novel styrylquinazoline analogues.
Molecules 2009, 14, 4246–4265.
35. Mrozek-Wilczkiewicz, A.; Kalinowski, D.; Musiol, R.; Finster, J.; Kovacevic, Z.; Jampilek, J.;
Rzeszowska-Wolny, J.; Richardson, D.R.; Polanski, J. Investigating anti-proliferative activity of
styrylazanaphthalenes and azanaphthalenediones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 2664–2671.
36. Serda, M.; Mrozek-Wilczkiewicz, A.; Jampilek, J.; Pesko, M.; Kralova, K.; Vejsova, M.; Musiol, R.;
Polanski, J. Investigation of biological properties for (hetero)aromatic thiosemicarbazones.
Molecules 2012, 17, 13483–13502.
37. Cieslik, W.; Musiol, R.; Nycz, J.; Jampilek, J.; Vejsova, M.; Wolff, M.; Machura, B.; Polanski, J.
Contribution to investigation of antimicrobial activity of styrylquinolines. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2012, 20, 6960–6968.
38. Rokade, Y.B.; Sayyed, R.Z. Naphthalene derivatives: A new range of antimicrobials with high
therapeutic value. Rasayan J. Chem. 2009, 2, 972–980.
39. Durrant, J.D.; Hall, L.; Swift, R.V.; Landon, M.; Schnaufer, A.; Schnaufer, A.; Amaro, R.E.
Novel naphthalene-based inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing ligase 1. PLoS Negl.
Trop. Dis. 2010, doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000803.
40. Parineeta, B.N. Derivatives of 1-chloromethyl naphthalene: Synthesis and microbiological
evaluation as potential antifungal agents. Der Pharma Chem. 2011, 3, 105–111.
41. Kanno, T.; Tanaka, A.; Shimizu, T.; Nakano, T.; Nishizaki, T. 1-[2-(2-Methoxyphenylamino)
ethylamino]-3-(naphthalene-1-yloxy)propan-2-ol as a potential anticancer drug. Pharmacology
2013, 91, 339–345.
42. Damu, G.L.V.; Wang, Q.P.; Zhang, H.Z.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Lv, J.S.; Zhou, C.H. A series of
naphthalimide azoles: Design, synthesis and bioactive evaluation as potential antimicrobial
agents. Sci. Chin. Chem. 2013, 56, 952–969.
43. Draber, W.; Tietjen, K.; Kluth, J.F.; Trebst, A. Herbicides in photosynthesis research.
Angew. Chem. 1991, 3, 1621–1633.
44. Tischer, W.; Strotmann, H. Relationship between inhibitor binding by chloroplasts and inhibition
of photosynthetic electron-transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1977, 460, 113–125.
45. Trebst, A.; Draber, W. Structure activity correlations of recent herbicides in photosynthetic
reactions. In Advances in Pesticide Science; Greissbuehler, H., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK,
1979; pp. 223–234.
46. Bowyer, J.R.; Camilleri, P.; Vermaas, W.F.J. Photosystem II and its interaction with herbicides.
In Herbicides, Topics in Photosynthesis; Baker, N.R., Percival, M.P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, 1991; Volume 10, pp. 27–85.
47. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria,
Nocardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes; Approved Standard, M24-A2, 2nd ed; National
Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, USA, 2011.
48. Carroll, J.; Douarre, P.; Coffey, A.; Buckley, J.; Cashman, B.; O’Farrell, K.; O’Mahony, J.
Optimization of a rapid viability assay for Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis by using
alamarBlue. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7870–7872.

Molecules 2014, 19
10408
49. Bueno, J. Antitubercular in vitro drug discovery: Tools for begin the search. In Understanding
Tuberculosis-New Approaches to Fighting against Drug Resistance; Cardona, P.J., Ed.; In Tech:
Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 147–168.
50. Janin, Y.L. Antituberculosis drugs: Ten years of research. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15,
2479–2513.
51. Bueno, R.V.; Braga, R.C.; Segretti, N.D.; Ferreir, E.I.; Trossini, G.H.; Andrade, C.H.
New tuberculostatic agents targeting nucleic acid biosynthesis: Drug design using QSAR
approaches. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 4474–4485.
52. Koul, A.; Vranckx, L.; Dhar, N.; Gohlmann, H.W.H.; Ozdemir, E.; Neefs, J.M.; Schulz, M.; Lu, P.;
Mortz, E.; McKinney, J.D.; et al. Delayed bactericidal response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to
bedaquiline involves remodelling of bacterial metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2014,
doi:10.1038/ncomms4369.
53. Suffness, M.; Douros, J. Current status of the NCI plant and animal product program. J. Nat. Prod.
1982, 45, 1–14.
54. Bell, F. CCLVII.–The migration of acyl grups in o-aminophenols. J. Chem. Soc. 1930, 1981–1987.
doi:10.1039/JR9300001981.
55. Kumar, K.N.; Sreeramamurthy, K.; Palle, S.; Mukkanti, K.; Das, P. Dithiocarbamate and
DBU-promoted amide bond formation under microwave condition. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51,
899–902.
56. Kobs, U.; Neumann, W.P. Facile and effective synthesis of unusually substituted aromatic
N-phenylamides. Chem. Ber. 1990, 123, 2191–2194.
57. Shah, R.; Deshpande, R.K. A simplified method for the preparation of anilides. J. Uni. Bombay
1933, 2, 125–127.
58. Strukil, V.; Bartolec, B.; Portada, T.; Dilovic, I.; Halasz, I.; Margetic, D. One-pot mechanosynthesis
of aromatic amides and dipeptides from carboxylic acids and amines. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
12100–12102.
59. Liu, L.H.; Guo, L.; Liu, C.H.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, Y.B. Intramolecular charge transfer with 1-
naphthanilides and 2-naphthanilides. Chin. J. Chem. 2005, 23, 857–864.
60. Zhang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Liebeskind, L.S. N-Amidation by copper-mediated cross-coupling of
organostannanes or boronic acids with O-acetyl hydroxamic acids. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
3005–3008.
61. Bahrami, K.; Khodaei, M.M.; Targhan, H.; Arabi, M.S. Preparation of esters and amides from
carboxylic acids and N-formylation of amines promoted by 1,3,5-triazo-2,4,6-triphosphorine-
2,2,4,4,6,6-hexachloride. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 5064–5068.
62. Tambade, P.J.; Patil, Y.P.; Bhanage, B.M. Palladium bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionate
catalyzed alkoxycarbonylation and aminocarbonylation reactions. Appl. Organometal. Chem.
2009, 23, 235–240.
63. El-Sheikh, M.I.; Marks, A.; Biehl, E.R. Investigation of the synthesis of benzoxazole via aryne
reaction. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3256–3259.
64. Aluri, B.R.; Niaz, B.; Kindermann, M.K.; Jones, P.G.; Heinicke, J. P-C-N-Heterocycles:
Synthesis of biaryl-type 1,3-benzazaphospholes with ortho-substituted phenyl or 2-heteroaryl
groups. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 211–224.

Molecules 2014, 19
10409
65. Masarovicova, E.; Kralova, K. Approaches to measuring plant photosynthesis activity. In
Handbook of Photosynthesis, 2nd ed.; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton,
FL, USA, 2005; pp. 617–656.
66. Kralova, K.; Sersen, F.; Sidoova, E. Photosynthesis inhibition produced by 2-alkylthio-6-R-
benzothiazoles. Chem. Pap. 1992, 46, 348–350.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).