921
M. T. Scerba et al.
Letter
Synlett
esting 6′-position, while simultaneously relieving some of
the potential electronic influence and steric congestion
neighboring the key imide moiety. With the amine re-
moved from direct proximity to the 3-position carbonyl,
thionations of 5-aminophthalimide 19 using P4S10–pyridine
or LR (Figure 5a,b) yielded nearly identical HPLC profiles af-
ter a one hour reaction time, with two resulting monothi-
onated products12 generated in practically equal ratios and
largely independent of the thionation reagent or solvent
employed (Figure 5; product peaks 10.9 and 11.4 min).
With the adjacent amine reestablished in 4-aminoph-
thalimide 17, the expected regiochemical preferences re-
surfaced, with LR providing a distinct major 1-thionated
species 20 (12.8 min) versus the 3-thionated product 18
(11.8 min) obtained with the P4S10–pyr/dioxane system
(Figure 5d,c). It is evident that in this simplified system, any
inherent electronic activation17 afforded by the amine alone
is not the sole driving force behind the observed re-
giochemical bias; if this were the case, one would expect
the product distributions in Figure 5c,d to mirror those in
Figure 5a,b. Although such activation may certainly con-
tribute to 4-aminophthalimide 3-position thionation and
reactivity in general, it is perhaps not significant enough to
overcome the regiochemical implications associated with
LR.
Additionally, a prominent solvent effect disparity be-
tween 1,4-dioxane and toluene influencing 3-thionation is
unlikely, as one would presume a more marked discrepancy
in the corresponding traces shown in Figure 5b,d. However,
the modest selectivity differences seen in pomalidomide
thionation (Table 1) may help to illuminate the importance
of aniline hydrogen bonding on the associated regiochemi-
cal bias, as the notably stronger hydrogen-bond-accepting
pyridine deteriorates the reaction rate and selectivity rela-
tive to weaker acceptors like 1,4-dioxane.18 While a full and
thorough mechanistic investigation is beyond the scope of
this preliminary (and largely empirical) study, the selectivi-
ty afforded here is quite striking and likely due to a complex
amalgamation of steric and electronic properties coupled
with the peculiarities of the specific thionating species in-
volved. Further mechanistic analyses and new thionated
materials are currently being explored.
Acknowledgment
N.G. has a patent on compounds 3 and 4, which is assigned to the Na-
tional Institute on Aging, NIH: Thalidomide Analogs and Methods of
Use. US 10,730,835 B2, 2020. The authors wish to thank Dr. Shelley
Jackson from the NIH NIDA Structural Biology Core for assistance
with the high-resolution mass spectrometry analyses.
Supporting Information
Supporting information for this article is available online at
S
u
p
p
orti
n
gI
n
f
orm
a
ti
o
n
S
u
p
p
orti
n
gInform
a
ti
o
n
References and Notes
(1) (a) Hoy, S. M. Drugs 2017, 77, 1897. (b) Chanan-Khan, A. A.;
Swaika, A.; Paulus, A.; Kumar, S. K.; Mikhael, J. R.; Rajkumar, S.
V.; Dispenzieri, A.; Lacy, M. Q. Blood Cancer J. 2013, 3, e143.
(2) (a) Park, E.; Levis, W. R.; Greig, N. H.; Euisun, J.; Schuller-Levis,
G. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2010, 9, 330. (b) Tweedie, D.; Frankola, K.
A.; Luo, W.; Li, Y.; Greig, N. H. Open Biochem. J. 2011, 5, 37.
(3) (a) Greig, N. H.; Luo, W.; Tweedie, D.; Holloway, H. W.; Yu, Q.-S.;
Goetzl, E. J. US 10220028B2, 2019. (b) Lin, C.-T.; Lecca, D.; Yang,
L.-Y.; Luo, W. L.; Scerba, M. T.; Tweedie, D.; Huang, P.-S.; Jung, Y.-
J.; Kim, D. S.; Yang, C.-H.; Hoffer, B. J.; Wang, J.-Y.; Greig, N. H.
eLife 2020, 9, e54726.
(4) See the Supporting Information for LC/MS profiles of a typical
reaction with Lawesson’s Reagent compared with our new
method.
(5) Zhu, X.; Giordano, T.; Yu, Q.-S.; Holloway, H. W.; Perry, T. A.;
Lahiri, D. K.; Brossi, A.; Greig, N. H. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5222.
(6) (a) Huang, J.; Chen, B.; Zhou, B.; Han, Y. New J. Chem. 2018, 42,
1181. (b) Geneste, H.; Ochse, M.; Drescher, K.; Dinges, J.; Jakob,
C. WO 2014041175, 2014. (c) Milewska, M. J.; Bytner, T.;
Polonski, T. Synthesis 1996, 1485. (d) Fang, F. G.; Danishefsky, S.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2747. (e) Greig, N. H.; Luo, W.;
Tweedie, D.; Holloway, H. W.; Yu, Q.-S.; Goetzl, E. J. US
8927725B2, 2015.
(7) (a) Seo, M-S.; Jang, S.; Jung, H.; Kim, H. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83,
14300. (b) Furet, P.; Bold, G.; Hofmann, F.; Manley, P.; Meyer, T.;
Altmann, K.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2967. (c) Kuhn,
B.; Mohr, P.; Stahl, M. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 2601. (d) Takeda,
T.; Suzuki, Y.; Kawamata, J.; Noro, S.-i.; Nakamurac, T.;
Akutagawa, T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 23905.
(8) (a) Vijayakanth,
T.;
Ram,
F.;
Praveenkumar,
B.;
Shanmuganathan, K.; Boomishankar, R. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31,
5964. (b) Kolodiazhna, A. O.; Kolodiazhnyi, O. I. Symmetry 2020,
12, 108. (c) Longobardi, L. E.; Wolter, W.; Stephan, D. W. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 809.
Conflict of Interest
(9) Bergman, J.; Pettersson, B.; Hasimbegovic, V.; Svensson, P. H.
J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1546.
The authors declare no conflict of interest
(10) Thionation of Pomalidomide: General Procedure
Representative conditions: A vial was charged with 25 mg of
pomalidomide (1 equiv) and the appropriate thionating reagent
(1.5 equiv of P4S10-pyridine, or 0.75 equiv of P4S10). The vial was
sealed and placed under N2. The indicated solvent (2.5 mL) was
injected and the mixture was stirred vigorously while the con-
tents were briefly degassed. Then, the reaction was heated to
100 °C and monitored by LC/MS. See the Supporting Informa-
tion for complete details.
Funding Information
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of
the NIH, National Institute on Aging (#AG000311).
N
a
ti
o
n
a
l
I
nstiutte
o
n
A
g
i
n
g
(A
G
0
0
0
3
1
1)
© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved. Synlett 2021, 31, 917–922