8998
versus SCE while the aromatic hydrocarbons were oxidized only at more positive potentials very
close to those where the electrolysis medium is also oxidised. Therefore, it is confirmed that the
coupling reaction results from oxidation of the aryl iodide and the reaction of the resulting
cation radical with the aromatic hydrocarbon.
Experimental: The electrolysis cell was based on a 250 cm3 beaker. A sheet of carbon felt
(dimensions 200×40 mm, thickness 15 mm) was formed into a cylindrical anode around the
perimeter of the beaker and a graphite rod cathode was placed at the centre of the beaker so
that there was a uniform gap between the two electrodes. The electrolyte was usually 100 cm3
of a solution containing aryl iodide (0.02 mol) and arene (0.03 mol) in acetic acid/25% acetic
anhydride/5% sulfuric acid. During the electrolysis, the solution was stirred with a magnetic
stirrer bar. A constant current of 0.4 A was passed until a charge equivalent to 1.6 F (80%
theoretical charge for the complete conversion of the arene). The consumption of reactants and
the formation of product were followed by HPLC. It was possible to isolate the diaryliodonium
salts as the bisulfates, white solids being formed on addition of diethyl ether directly to the
electrolysis solution. While pure crystals were obtained, the isolated yields were poor. Hence, the
products were normally isolated as the iodide salts. At the termination of the electrolyses, the
electrodes were washed well with hot methanol and the washings combined with the reaction
mixture. The solvents were removed in vacuo and the resulting oil was dissolved in diethyl ether.
The dimethyldiphenyliodonium bisulfate was extracted into water and the corresponding iodide
was precipitated by the addition of KI. The solid diaryliodonium iodide was dried and weighed
(typically 2.5–5 g of the iodide salt was obtained). All products were characterised by 1H and 13
NMR and mass spectroscopy.
C
References
1. Banks, D. F. Chem. Rev. 1966, 66, 243.
2. Varvoglis, A. The Organic Chemistry of Polycoordinated Iodine; VCH: New York, 1992.
3. Varvoglis, A. Hypervalent Iodine in Organic Synthesis; Academic Press: London, 1997.
4. Stang, P. J.; Zhdankin, V. V. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1123.
5. Wirth, T.; Hirt, V. H. Synthesis 1999, 1271.
6. Miller, L. L.; Hoffmann, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 593.
7. Hoffelner, H.; Lorch, H. W.; Wendt, H. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1975, 66, 183.
8. Weinberg, N. L.; Weinberg, H. R.; Tunis, A. Proceedings Electrochem. Soc. Spring Meeting, Abstract 976, May
1996.
9. Cushman, M. R.; Lentz, C. M.; Overton, J. R.; Cornell, D. D.; Weinberg, N. L.; Weinberg, H. R.; Tunis, A.;
Maffucci, S. E. 9th International Forum on Electrolysis in the Chemical Industry, Sand Key, Florida, November
1995.
10. Kazmierczak, P.; Skulski, L. Synthesis 1995, 1027.
.