1520
N. S. Cutshall et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1517–1520
selectivity against GRO-a versus FMLP but removed
potential oxidative liabilities of the thioglycolate-based
analogues.
References and Notes
1. (a) Harada, A.; Mukaida, N.; Matsushima, K. Mol. Med.
Today 1996, 2, 482. (b) Murdoch, C.; Finn, A. Blood 2000, 95,
3032.
Potential replacements for the ester functional group
were investigated (Table 3). In general, aliphatic amides
displayed limited potency against GRO-a driven
chemotaxis while the aniline-based derivatives showed
modest potencies. Compound 10f was the only analogue
tested that showed activity <1 mM. Again, these ana-
logues have a similar selectivity profile as the series
previously described. Several explanations of the
attenuated overall potencies of this series is possible.
The compounds may display a reduced ability to pass
through the cell membrane or have increased enzymatic
stability toward hydrolases in the cell which could result
in lower intracellular concentrations of 5h. Alter-
natively, this series may simply have a reduced affinity
for the CXCR2 receptor.
2. Palovich, M. R.; Widdowson, K.; Elliott, J. D.; White, J.
R.; Sarau, H. M.; Rutledge, M. C.; Bi, J.; Dede, K. A.; Ben-
son, G. M.; Griswold, D. E.; Martin, L. D.; Nie, H.; Schmidt,
D. M.; Foley, J. J. Abstracts of Papers, Part 2, 219th National
Meeting of the American Chemical Society, San Francisco,
CA, March 26–30, 2000; American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 2000; MEDI 338.
3. Li, J. J.; Yue, W. S.; Trivedi, B. K.; Miller, S. R.; Connor, D.
T.; Roth, B. D.; Low, J. E.; Heilig, D. J.; Hunt, S.; Carson, K.
G.; Glynn, R. A.; Ye, Q.; Luly, J. R.; Yang, W.; Qin, S. Abstracts
of Papers, 220th National Meeting of the American Chemical
Society, Washington, D.C., August 20–24, 2000; American
Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2000; MEDI 144.
4. Cutshall, N. S.; Ursino, R.; Kucera, K. A.; Latham, J.;
Ihle, N. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1951.
5. Windscheif, P.; Vogtle, F. Synthesis 1994, 87.
6. Neutrophil isolation and GRO-a or FMLP chemotaxis was
conducted according to Frevert, C. W.; Wong, V. A.; Good-
man, R. B.; Goodwin, R.; Martin, T. R. J. Immunol. Methods
1998, 213, 41. The following is a representative procedure: The
lower chambers of a ChemoTx plate (Neuro Probe, Gaithers-
burg, MD) were filled with 29 mL of 50 nM GRO-a (Pepro-
Tech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and test compound. The empty upper
chambers were affixed to the lower (plate), and 25 mL of PMN
suspension of calcein AM tagged cells (3E6 cells/mL), without
(control) or with 0.04–40 mM test compound, preincubated
30 min, was added to the upper wells. Test compounds were
dissolved in DMSO (100%) at 20 mM and diluted in assay
buffer to the desired concentrations; final DMSO concen-
tration was 0.2%. Neutrophil migration proceeded for 40 min at
37ꢀC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. After removing
nonmigrated cells from the top of the plate, migrated cells were
quantified by reading fluorescence on a Wallac Victor. Max-
imum chemotactic response was determined by cells to which no
compound was added (positive control), whereas the negative
control (unstimulated) was defined by the absence of chemokine
in the lower chamber. The ratio of the positive to negative con-
trols represents the chemotactic index of the cells.
Lastly, a limited amount of SAR was explored where
the amide functionality at the 3 position of the nicoti-
nanilide core was reversed (Scheme 4). Compound 13,
representative of this class of antagonists, showed an
IC50=360 nM against GRO-a driven neutrophil
chemotaxis. Since significant potency and selectivity of
this series has been retained it is expected that addi-
tional changes to this portion of the molecule may be
tolerated.
In conclusion, the synthesis and evaluation of a novel
series of potent and selective GRO-a driven neutrophil
chemotaxis inhibitors have been described. Initial data
indicates that this class of compounds may function as
ester prodrugs by which they penetrate the cell and are
then converted to the bioactive species via enzymatic
hydrolysis to the corresponding carboxylate salt.10
Additional studies are planned to further explore the
cellular signaling pathway by which these compounds
function.
7. Ng, H. P.; May, K.; Bauman, J. G.; Ghannam, A.; Islam,
I.; Liang, M.; Horuk, R.; Hesselgesser, J.; Snider, R. M.;
Perez, H. D.; Morrissey, M. M. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4680.
8. Binding assays were conducted at Panlabs (Bothell, WA)
and were based on the displacement of [125I]-IL-8 from CHO
cell membranes expressing human CXCR2 receptors.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Breda Twomey
for performing assays on these compounds and Mr.
Ted Baughman and Dr. Scott Jeffrey, for helpful
discussions.
9. Hall, D. A.; Beresford, I. J. M.; Browning, C.; Giles, H. Br.
J. Pharmacol. 1999, 126, 810.
10. Robbins, B. L.; Srinivas, R. V.; Kim, C.; Bischofberger,
N.; Fridland, A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 612.