design concept was sketched in Scheme 2. We envisioned
that a phenolic substrate B tethered with a carbon-based
nucleophile, preferably a CdC double bond moiety, at its
ortho-position would likely undergo ortho-oxidative dear-
omative spiro-carbocyclization under appropriate oxida-
tion stimulation to directly yield the desired spiro-
cyclohexadienone skeleton A, which would subsequently
serve as a shared facile entry point to other derived spiro-[6-
5]-bicycles. Although it might initially be conceived that
simple alkene-substituted phenols structured as B1 would
function as reasonable substrates, our own experiments and
literature reviews5,8 had in fact unanimously pointed to the
lesson that it is very difficult to obtain generally efficient and
reproducible ortho-dearomatization events on this type of
substrates. This may in fact explain the extreme scarcity of
literature disclosures on B1-type phenols. Our failure-in-
spired recognition is thus that a reliable B-to-A conversion
would require new types of phenolic substrates in which the
incorporated electron-rich double bond is capable of not
only initiating ortho-nucleophilic trapping toward the dear-
omatized cationic ring but also stabilizing thus the formed
carbocation against competing decompositions. Guided by
this recognition, we decided to focus on phenols that are
ortho-substituted by either a pendant allylsilane (B2) or
vinyl ether (B3). It is important to note that oxidative
dearomatization of an allylsilane-functionalized phenol13
had previously been reported by Nicolaou et al. under the
influence of PhI(OAc)2 oxidation, albeit in the para- rather
than ortho-spiroannulation manner.10a,b
The implementations of B2- and B3-type substrates in
the intended ortho-dearomative spirocarbocyclizations,
however, turned out to be nontrivial. With S1 and S2 as
the standard substrates (Scheme 2), it was only through the
repeated interactions of purposeful screening and fortu-
nate serendipity that we eventually were able to identify
optimal conditions capable of bringing about the desired
transformations on each of them (see Supporting Informa-
tion for details of substrate syntheses and experimental
screening). Both cases employed PhI(OAc)2 asthe oxidant,
thereby significantly enhancing the method’s practicality
and ease in implementation. For S1, the standard condi-
tion I recruited a mixture of CF3CH2OH (TFE) and
CH2Cl2 (volume ratio 1/1) as the reaction solvent and
0.02 M substrate concentration; for S2 (in 1/1 geometric
E/Z mixtures), the standard condition II utilized pure TFE
as the solvent and maintained the 0.02M substrate concen-
tration. The additive effect in both conditions had proved
Scheme 1. Biologically Active Natural Products Featuring
Functionalized Ortho-Spiro-[6-5]-bicyclic Cores
concomitant CÀC bond construction,8,9 particularly in an
ortho- rather than para-selective manner.10 The challenge
escalates in the fact that such fully CÀC bond formation-
enabled phenol dearomatization inevitably incurs the emer-
gence of so-called all-carbon quaternary stereogenic centers11
that situate exactly at the corresponding spiro-ring
junctions.12 To the best of our knowledge, there appears to
be only two studies by Pettus3a and Feringa3b and co-work-
ers, respectively, both reported in 2011, that have successfully
realized selective ortho-dearomatization of phenols and
naphthols with strategic CÀC bonds formation for the
targeted construction of spiro-carbocycles. The substrate
scopes they examined appeared to be limited, and phenols
have proven to be more challenging motifs than naphthols for
the events of oxidative dearomatizations.3b,c Thus it remains
to be seen if a more generally applicable ortho-oxidative
phenol dearomatization protocol can be established to enable
the facile construction of all-carbon quaternary spiro-carbo-
cycles, and ideally with more readily commercially available
and user-friendly oxidants such as PhI(OAc)2.6
Stimulated by this challenge, we initiated a program that
attempts to explore a potentially general solution. Our
(10) Selected dearomatizations of phenols leading to para-selective all-
carbon spiro-cycles; see: (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Edmonds, D. J.; Li, A.; Tria,
G. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3942. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Li, A.;
Edmonds, D. J.; Tria, G. S.; Ellery, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16905.
(c) Honda, T.; Shigehisa, H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 657. (d) Beaulieu, M.-A.;
to be remarkable: while the 4 e molecular sieve was selected
´
ꢀ
Guerard, K. C.; Maertens, G.; Sabot, C.; Canesi, S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76,
9460. (e) Andrez, J.-C.; Giroux, M.-A.; Lucien, J.; Canesi, S. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 4368. (f) Nemoto, T.; Zhao, Z.; Yokosaka, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Wu, R.;
Hamada, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2217. (g) Rousseaux, S.;
for the former case, MgSO4 was chosen in the latter. Under
those defined conditions, the reactions proceeded quickly
even at a very low temperature of À40 °C, delivering the
desired ortho-spirobicyclic products P1 and P2 in 57% and
66% isolated yield, respectively. These yields are respectable,
´
GarcUa-Fortanet, J.; Angel Del Aguila Sanchez, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9282. (h) Dohi, Y.; Minamitsuji, Y.; Maruyama, A.;
Hirose, S.; Kita, Y. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3559. (i) Dohi, T.; Nakae, T.;
Ishikado, T.; Kato, D.; Kita, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 6899.
(11) For a review on constructions of all-carbon quaternary stereo-
centers, see: Trost, B. M.; Jiang, C. H. Synthesis 2006, 3, 369.
(12) For general synthesis methods on spiro compounds, see: (a)
Rios, R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1060. (b) Asaoka, M.; Takenouchi,
K.; Takei, H. Chem. Lett. 1988, 17, 1225. (c) Sannigrahi, M. Tetrahedron
1999, 55, 9007. (d) Zhang, E.; Fan, C.-A.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Zhang, F.-M.;
Song, Y.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14626. (e) Trost, B. M.; Chen,
D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12541.
(13) For examples of the oxidative HosomiÀSakurai-type dearoma-
ꢀ
tizations, see: (a) Guerard, K. C.; Sabot, C.; Beaulieu, M.-A.; Giroux,
ꢀ
M.-A.; Canesi, S. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 5893. (b) Quideau, S.; Pouysegu,
L.; Oxoby, M.; Looney, M. A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 319. (c) Quideau,
ꢀ
S.; Looney, M. A.; Pouysegu, L. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1651. (d) Sabot, C.;
ꢀ
Guerard, K. C.; Canesi, S. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2941.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX