6 was used as a substrate of ozonolysis (Scheme 1).6 The
reason is not clear again. Since the fragment 7 included only
two stereogenic centers, we took advantage of the chemical
synthesis of the fragment 7 in a stereochemically defined
manner. The relative stereochemistry of the fragment 7 was
(R)-(-)-MTPA chloride to give di-(-)-MTPA ester 14. The
1H NMR spectrum of naturally derived (-)-MTPA ester 14
was quite different from that of the synthetic (-)-MTPA ester
13b but completely identical to that of (+)-MTPA ester 13a
as shown in Figure 3. Consequently, the absolute stereo-
1
envisioned to be syn (S,S or R,R), because the H-1H
coupling constant between two stereogenic centers of 7 was
relatively small (J ) 3.2 Hz). Consequently, we synthesized
the authentic sample from the known (R,R)-diol 87 as shown
in Scheme 2. Protection of hydroxy groups of 8 with a TBS
Scheme 2a
a Reaction conditions: (a) TBSCl, imidazole/DMF; (b) H2, Pd-
C/EtOH; (c) MsCl, Et3N/CH2Cl2; (d) NaCN/DMSO; (e) DIBAL/
toluene; (f) NaBH4/MeOH; (g) 2 N HCl/THF; (h) (S)-(+)-MTPACl,
DMAP/py or (R)-(-)-MTPACl, DMAP/py.
Figure 3. Partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, CDCl3) of (A) (+)-
MTPA ester 13a, (B) naturally derived (-)-MTPA ester 14, and
(C) (-)-MTPA ester 13b.
group and deprotection of the benzyl group by hydrogenation
afforded 9 in high yield. The primary hydroxy group of 9
was displaced with a cyano group via its mesylate to give
10. Reduction of 10 with DIBAL, followed further by NaBH4
reduction, gave alcohol 11 in 65% yield. Acidic hydrolysis
of 11 with 2 N HCl yielded triol 12.
chemistry of C17-C18 of 1 was proven to be enantiomeric
to the synthetic triol 12. In conclusion, by combining all the
data discussed above, the absolute stereochemistry of 1 was
unequivocally determined as shown in Figure 4.
The triol 12 was converted into di-(+)- or (-)-MTPA
esters 13a or 13b, respectively, in order to be compared with
the corresponding naturally derived MTPA ester. Thus,
the above-mentioned fragment 7 was hydrolyzed with
MeOK-MeOH, and the resulting triol was then treated with
(6) Spectroscopic data of compounds 2, 3, and 7. Compound 2: 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.07 (d, J ) 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.98-2.12 (m, 2H), 2.21-
2.26 (m, 1H), 3.14 (dd, J ) 2.3, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (dd, J ) 2.3, 4.2 Hz,
1H), 3.81 (m, 1H), 3.98 (m, 1H), 4.26 (dd, J ) 5.9, 11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (dd,
J ) 8.0, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (dt, J ) 11.3, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (ddd, J ) 5.3,
8.4, 11.2 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (m, 4H), 7.56 (m, 2H), 8.02 (m, 4H); 13C NMR
(126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 10.9, 33.8, 35.9, 57.1, 58.0, 61.3, 66.4, 67.2, 68.3,
128.4, 128.4, 128.5, 129.6, 129.6, 130.0, 133.1, 133.1, 166.7, 166.7.
Compound 3: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.04 (d, J ) 7.0 Hz, 3H),
1.15 (d, J ) 6.2 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d, J ) 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.80-1.81 (m, 1H),
1.93-2.00 (m, 1H), 2.01-2.04 (m, 1H), 2.26 (double quintet, J ) 2.0, 7.1
Hz, 1H), 3.19 (s, 3H), 3.24 (dq, J ) 6.1, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (m, 1H), 3.65
(m, 1H), 5.33 (dd, J ) 4.1, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (dt, J ) 9.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H),
7.26 (dd, J ) 7.7, 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (t, J ) 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (t, J ) 7.3
Hz, 1H), 7.51 (dd, J ) 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (dd, J ) 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 2H),
7.94 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.7, 11.4, 16.2,
36.0, 39.0, 40.2, 56.4, 58.4, 69.9, 76.1, 79.0, 128.1, 128.3, 129.5, 129.6,
130.2, 130.3, 132.6, 132.9, 166.1, 167.3. Compound 7: 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 0.95 (d, J ) 6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.55 (ddt, J ) 4.7, 14.3, 6.4, Hz, 1H),
1.74 (ddt, J ) 6.2, 14.5, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.84 (double sextet, J ) 3.2, 6.8 Hz,
1H), 1.90 (m, 2H), 3.67 (ddd, J ) 4.6, 7.6, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (m, 2H),
4.44 (ddd, J ) 5.6, 5.6, 11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (dt, J ) 11.3, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.45
(t, J ) 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (m, 1H), 8.04 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 14.4, 32.8, 36.0, 36.4, 60.7, 62.7, 71.4, 128.4, 129.6, 133.0, 167.1.
Figure 4. Absolute stereochemistry of FD-891 (1).
As described above, FD-891 (1) appeared to be structurally
related to concanamycin A. However, the biological char-
acteristics of these two natural products are fairly different.
These findings raised a question of how 1 and concanamycin
A exert their effect at the molecular level. As the first step,
we initiated detailed conformational and structure-activity
investigations of 1 and concanamycin A. Molecular modeling
approach has been frequently used to determine the lower
(7) (a) Arai, H.; Matsushima, Y.; Eguchi, T.; Shindo, K.; Kakinuma, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3181. (b) Ireland, R. E.; Thaisrivongs, S.;
Dussault, P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5768.
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 20, 2002
3385