Phenoxazine-containing ODNs showed striking sequence-
dependent differences in their ability to stabilize the duplexes
with respect to the unmodified ODNs. In the sequences where
the 5′ flanking nucleobase was a purine (APA, APC, GPG,
and GPC), the phenoxazine nucleobase produced little or no
stabilizing effect (∆Tm ( 1 °C). The most stabilized
duplexes (∆Tm ) 5.5-8.5 °C) were those in which
phenoxazine was flanked by a 5′ cytosine (CPA, CPC, and
CPG), while the TPT duplex was moderately stabilized (∆Tm
) 3.5 °C). These results are in good agreement with those
reported for DNA duplexes incorporating the phenothiazine
analog.6b
As a general trend, G-clamp-containing duplexes were
much more stable than those containing either cytosine or
phenoxazine, thus confirming the outstanding stabilizing
properties of this cytosine analog. However, a noticeable
sequence-dependent effect was again observed that shares
some common trends with phenoxazine-containing duplexes.
The most stabilized duplexes (∆Tm ) 15.5-18 °C) were
those in which the G-clamp was flanked by a 5′ cytosine
(CXA, CXC, and CXG). On the contrary, the lowest
stabilizing effects were observed when the G-clamp was
flanked by a 5′ purine (AXA, AXC, GXG, and GXC), 5′
guanines being significantly more stabilizing (∆Tm ) 11.5-
14 °C) than 5′ adenines (∆Tm ) 4-9 °C). Another clear
effect is that, for a given 5′ residue, the presence of cytosine
at the 3′ side of the G-clamp was more stabilizing than that
of a purine, especially when the 3′ purine was adenine (AXC
vs AXA and CXC vs CXA) and much less when it was
guanine (GXC vs GXG and CXC vs CXG). This behavior
can be attributed to the aminoethoxy arm of the G-clamp,
since it was not observed in phenoxazine-containing du-
plexes, where the differences between these pairs of triplets
were less significant. The consequence for the less stable 5′
purine G-clamp sequences was that the presence of a 3′
cytosine partially counterbalanced the negative impact of the
5′ purine on the binding affinity (AXC vs AXA and GXC
vs GXG).
stabilizing properties of the nucleobase modifications lead
to interesting inversions in the order of stability of certain
pairs of triplets. For example, the GCG triplet gives more
stable duplexes than GCC, but their stabilities are almost
identical when the central C is replaced by X. An inversion
in stability (Tm) is observed for other pairs of triplets: CCG
> CCC but CXC > CXG; ACC > CCA but CXA > AXC;
etc.
∆∆Tm values (Table 1) were calculated to evaluate the
contribution of the appending aminoethoxy arm with respect
to that provided by the phenoxazine ring. These values
clearly reveal that the stabilizing effect of the additional
hydrogen bond formed by the protonated amino group is
higher than that resulting from the stacking interactions of
the phenoxazine ring. Moreover, from the comparison of
∆Tm and ∆∆Tm values it can be inferred that the amino-
ethoxy arm of the G-clamp is the main contributor to the
enhanced binding affinity of the sequences where the
G-clamp is flanked by a 5′ purine.
The melting temperatures of the CCC, CPC, and CXC
duplexes were also determined at different salt concentrations
(70, 140, and 280 mM KCl). As expected, the Tm values
increased with ionic strength because of the decrease in the
repulsion between phosphate groups (Supporting Informa-
tion). However, the increase in Tm values was the same for
the three sequences, irrespective of whether C, P, or X was
present, indicating that the enhanced affinity of the G-clamp-
modified ODNs cannot be attributed to an ionic interaction
between the protonated amino group of X and a phosphate
group of the complementary strand.
It is also worth noting that the CD spectra of the
phenoxazine- and G-clamp-containing duplexes showed the
characteristic profile of a B-form DNA, and did not exhibit
significant differences compared with unmodified duplexes.
In all cases, a positive band centered at 280 nm and a
negative band at 250 nm were observed (Supporting Infor-
mation).
The amino-G-clamp cytosine analog has also been intro-
duced in PNA sequences and reported to produce a dramatic
increase in the stabilities of PNA-DNA and PNA-RNA
duplexes when placed between two cytosines (∆Tm ) 18.2
and 23.7 °C, respectively).8 In order to check whether this
stabilizing effect was maintained in our sequences, we
decided to study two PNAs with the same sequence as the
DNA strands exhibiting the most extreme behavior, those
in which the G-clamp was flanked by two cytosines or two
adenines: H-gcacxctacg-NH2 and H-gcaaxatacg-NH2. PNA
monomers were obtained as previously described with minor
modifications,9 and introduced in PNA sequences using
standard solid-phase procedures. The UV melting curves of
PNA-DNA duplexes showed, again, the remarkable stabiliz-
ing effect of the G-clamp (Supporting Information). The Tms
of the PNA-DNA duplexes formed by H-gcacxctacg-NH2
and H-gcaaxatacg-NH2 were 16 and 8.5 °C, respectively,
Overall, the ∆Tm values shown in Table 1 indicate that
the increase in the binding affinities of oligonucleotides
modified with phenoxazine or G-clamp is far from being
homogeneous. Table 2 depicts the relative order (in paren-
theses) of duplex stabilities of the unmodified and P or X
modified sequences, showing that the non-homogeneous
Table 2. Relative Order of Thermal Stabilities of the Duplexes
(in Parentheses) Formed by the Natural Sequences and the P-
or X-Modified Oligonucleotides
cytosine (C)
phenoxazine (P)
G-clamp (X)
GCG (1)
GCC (2)
CCG (2)
CCC (4)
ACC (5)
CCA (6)
ACA (7)
TCT (8)
GPG (3)
GPC (5)
CPG (1)
CPC (2)
APC (6)
CPA (4)
APA (8)
TPT (6)
GXG (4)
GXC (3)
CXG (2)
CXC (1)
AXC (7)
CXA (5)
AXA (8)
TXT (6)
(8) Rajeev, K. G.; Maier, M. A.; Lesnik, E. A.; Manoharan, M. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4395-4398.
(9) Aus´ın, C.; Ortega, J.-A.; Robles, J.; Grandas, A.; Pedroso, E. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 4073-4075.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 22, 2007
4505