Revisiting the Ullmann-Ether Reaction
5,7-Dich lor o-1-p h en yld ib en zo[2,3:6,7]oxep in o[4,5-d ]-
p yr a zole (1c), after crystallization from Et2O: 76%, as an
amber glassy solid; mp 105-107 °C (Et2O); Rf 0.42 (30%
EtOAc/hexanes); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 6.81 (1H, dd, J ) 7.9, 1.6
Hz), 6.97 (1H, ddd, J ) 7.9, 7.9, 2.0 Hz), 7.34 (1H, dd, J ) 7.9,
1.6 Hz), 7.37-7.47 (6H, m), 7.58 (1H, d, J ) 1.2 Hz), 7.61 (1H,
d, J ) 1.2 Hz), 8.03 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 122.5, 123.1,
125.2, 125.3, 127.8, 128.3, 128.5, 128.7, 129.3, 130.5, 130.6,
137.9, 139.7, 149.6, 155.9; FTIR (neat film, cm-1) 1593; EIMS
(m/z, %) 382 (M + 4, 13), 380 (M + 2, 71), 378 (M+, 100), 342
(12), 279 (14), 77 (36). Anal. Calcd for C21H12Cl2IN2O: C, 66.51;
H, 3.19; N, 7.39. Found: C, 66.46; H, 3.45; N, 7.44.
109.1, 117.6, 120.0, 122.2, 126.6, 128.6, 134.0, 137.2, 142.7,
146.7, 149.0, 149.7, 156.4, 160.4, 162.3; FTIR (neat film, cm-1
1615; EIMS (m/z, %) 430 (M+, 100), 415 (17), 387 (9), 215 (10),
77 (15). Anal. Calcd for C25H22N2O5: C, 69.76; H, 5.15; N, 6.51.
Found: C, 69.99; H, 5.21; N, 6.61.
)
Meth od B (Bu ch w a ld -Ha r tw ig Rea ction ). 1-P h en yl-
d iben zo[2,3:6,7]oxep in o[4,5-d ]p yr a zole (1a ). Typ ica l P r o-
ced u r e. Ground NaOH (99%, 0.023 g, 0.56 mmol) was added
to a stirred suspension of halophenolic pyrazole 2a (0.22. g,
0.51 mmol) in anhydrous PhMe (14 mL) at ambient temper-
ature under an atmosphere of Ar. The resultant mixture was
heated to reflux for 30 min and allowed to cool without stirring.
The supernatant orange solution containing the phenolate 20a
was transferred via cannula to an empty flask and was
degassed by bubbling with Ar (20 min). A mixture of Pd2(dba)3
(99%, 16.5 mg, 17.9 µmol) and DPPF (97%, 40.9 mg, 71.6 µmol)
in anhydrous and degassed THF (1.6 mL) was stirred for 20
min at ambient temperature under an atmosphere of Ar and
added dropwise to the previously prepared solution of pheno-
late 20a . The reaction mixture was heated at 100 °C for 17 h,
until consumption of starting material was confirmed by TLC
(2% EtOAc/DCM). After cooling to ambient temperature, the
crude mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite and
thoroughly washed with THF and the filtrate was evaporated
under reduced pressure. The residue was flash chromato-
graphed on silica gel eluting with the gradient 80f100% DCM/
hexanes to give dibenzoxepine 1a (0.11 g, 69%) as an off-white
powder.
10,11-Dim eth oxy-1-p h en yld iben zo[2,3:6,7]oxep in o[4,5-
d ]p yr a zole (1d ), after crystallization from Et2O: 69%, as a
white powder; mp 166-167 °C (Et2O), Rf 0.44 (2% EtOAc/
DCM); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.30 (3H, s), 3.90 (3H, s), 6.20 (1H,
s), 6,90 (1H, s), 7.20-7.27 (1H, m), 7.30 (1H, dd, J ) 8.1, 1.5
Hz), 7.38-7.58 (7H, m), 8.03 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 55.4,
56.0, 105.5, 110.1, 113.9, 119.6, 121.3, 125.5, 125.7, 127.1,
128.0, 128.5, 129.2, 136.4, 137.8, 140.0, 145.6, 150.4, 155.9;
FTIR (neat film, cm-1) 1612; EIMS (m/z, %) 370 (M+, 100),
323 (15), 295 (24), 169 (13), 77 (17). Anal. Calcd for C23H18
-
N2O3: C, 74.58; H, 4.90; N, 7.56. Found: C, 74.49; H, 4.96; N,
7.61.
10-N,N-Dieth ylam in o-1-ph en yldiben zo[2,3:6,7]oxepin o-
[4,5-d ]p yr a zole (1e), after purification by flash chromatog-
raphy using 80% DCM/hexanes as eluant: 57%, as a yellow
oil; Rf 0.64 (40% EtOAc/hexanes); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.15 (6H,
t, J ) 6.7 Hz), 3.34 (4H, q, J ) 6.7 Hz), 6.22 (1H, dd, J ) 8.9,
2.6 Hz), 6.60 (1H, d, J ) 8.9 Hz), 6.61 (1H, d, J ) 2.6 Hz),
7.20-7.46 (7H, m), 7.55 (2H, dd, J ) 7.5, 1.6 Hz), 7.99 (1H, s);
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 12.5, 44.4, 104.0, 107.8, 121.5, 125.1, 125.3,
127.0, 127.5, 128.2, 129.0, 129.2, 137.8, 140.7, 155.7, 158.2;
FTIR (neat film, cm-1) 1622; EIMS (m/z, %) 381 (M+, 81), 364
(100), 338 (20), 337 (38), 308 (8), 281 (8), 181 (20), 77 (24).
Anal. Calcd for C25H23N3O: C, 78.71; H, 6.08; N, 11.02. Found:
C, 78.56; H, 6.20; N, 11.19.
The application of this procedure on the appropriate halophe-
nolic pyrazole 2 afforded the corresponding dibenzoxepine
derivative 1 in the yield indicated in Table 5. The same
protocol was followed when (R)-BINAP was used as ligand
instead of DPPF. Catalyst ratio was increased in the case of
deactivated substrates. In all cases, the purity of the obtained
dibenzoxepines was >95% according to their spectroscopic (1H
NMR) and spectrometric (GC/MS) analyses.
1-P h en yl-5,6,9,10-tetr am eth oxydiben zo[2,3:6,7]oxepin o-
[4,5-d ]p yr a zole (1g), after crystallization from Et2O: 78%, as
a white powder; mp 187-189 °C (Et2O); Rf 0.54 (2% EtOAc/
DCM); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.82 (3H, s), 3.92 (6H, s), 4.08 (3H,
s), 6.46 (1H, d, J ) 9.1 Hz), 6.51 (1H, d, J ) 9.1 Hz), 6.98 (1H,
s), 7.05 (1H, s), 7.37-7.48 (3H, m), 7.52 (2H, dd, J ) 8.7, 1.5
Hz), 7.99 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 56.0, 56.1, 56.3, 61.8,
105.9, 108.2, 108.7, 117.0, 117.4, 119.5, 122.9, 125.1, 127.7,
129.1, 135.8, 137.3, 140.2, 141.7, 149.1, 149.2, 150.5, 154.3;
FTIR (neat film, cm-1) 1600; EIMS (m/z, %) 430 (M+, 100),
415 (16), 387 (10), 77 (10). Anal. Calcd for C25H22N2O5: C,
69.76; H, 5.15; N, 6.51. Found: C, 69.94; H, 5.10; N, 6.67.
1-P h en yl-5,6,10,12-t et r a m et h oxyd ib en zo[2,3:6,7]oxe-
p in o[4,5-d ]p yr a zole (1h ), after purification by flash chro-
matography on silica gel eluting with the gradient 50f70%
EtOAc/hexanes and subsequent crystallization of the pure
eluate from EtOH: 72%, as a white powder; mp 151-153 °C
(EtOH); Rf 0.43 (60% EtOAc/hexanes); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.01
(3H, s), 3.84 (3H, s), 3.92 (6H, s), 6.09 (1H, d, J ) 2.2 Hz),
6.56 (1H, d, J ) 2.2 Hz), 7.24 (1H, d, J ) 7.7 Hz), 7.36 (2H,
Ack n ow led gm en t. This research was financially
supported by the University of the Basque Country
(UPV 170.310G37/98), the Ministry of Education and
Culture of Spain (PB97-0600) and the Basque Govern-
ment (GV170.310-G0053/96). R.O. and F.C. thank the
Basque Government and the Ministry of Education and
Culture, respectively, for their predoctoral scholarships.
We are gratefully indebted to Dr. Aurelio Orjales and
Luis Labeaga (Director of Research and Head of Phar-
macology Department respectively at FAES FARMA,
Leioa-Lamiako (Bizkaia, Spain) for the preliminary
pharmacological evaluation and invaluable discussion
of the results.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Experimental pro-
cedures for the synthesis of precursors and intermediates (2-
17); pharmacological results (Table S1) and the corresponding
experimental procedures. This material is available free of
dd, J ) 7.7, 7.7 Hz), 7.45 (2H, d, J ) 7.7 Hz), 7.97 (1H, s); 13
NMR (CDCl3) δ 54.3, 55.5, 56.1, 56.3, 95.9, 98.8, 105.2, 105.6,
C
J O025767J
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 67, No. 21, 2002 7225