Adam et al.
SCHEME 3. Syn th esis of twin
Deu ter iu m -Ster eola beled Alk en es 1
F IGURE 1. Relative ene reactivity of lone-substituted 2-meth-
yl-2-butenes with nitrosoarene.
tion of ArNO with styrenes that bear lone aryl substit-
uents. Since the nitrosoarene enophile is more prone to
1
steric and electronic control than O2 and TAD, a highly
selective process might be anticipated for ArNO. The
results of the lone-substituent influence in the ene
reaction of ArNO with the deuterium-labeled alkenes 1
are reported here, and their mechanistic consequences
presented.
F IGURE 2. Expected steric influence of the lone substituent
on twix/twin regioselectivity in the ArNO ene reaction with
trisubstituted alkenes.
SCHEME 2. Coor d in a tion Effects in 1O2 a n d MTAD
En e Rea ction s of Alk en es w ith Ar yl Su bstitu en ts
a t th e Lon e P osition
Resu lts
The twin deuterium-stereolabeled alkenes with various
lone substituents were prepared by stereoselective Wittig
coupling between methyl 2-triphenylphosphoranylidene-
propanoate and the appropriate aldehydes, followed by
reduction of the E-configured esters with LiAlD4 (Scheme
3).9 The resulting alcohols were mesylated7b or, in the
case of the styrenes, transformed into the corresponding
chlorides7b for the subsequent reduction with LiAlD4 to
the twin deuterium-labeled alkenes 1.
The ene reaction of 4-nitronitrosobenzene with the twin
deuterium-labeled lone alkyl- and aryl-substituted al-
kenes 1 gave the expected regioisomeric ene products
from twix and twin hydrogen abstraction, which were
identified and quantified by means of 1H NMR spectros-
copy (Table 1). To confirm the authenticity of the ene
products, the ene reaction with the unlabeled alkenes
1-d 0 was conducted on the preparative scale and the
unlabeled ene products were isolated and fully character-
ized (see Supporting Information).
For the lone alkyl-substituted alkenes 1a -f (entries
1-6), the twix selectivity is quite constant at about 85 (
3%, while for the tert-butyl derivative 1g (entry 7), the
twix regioisomer is heavily favored (> 95%). For the ethyl
substrate 1b (entry 2), about 16% of the ene product
(hydroxylamine) is oxidized in situ by the enophile to the
corresponding nitrone and hydrolyzed to its ketone.10
Fortunately, the regioselectivity is not affected by this
side reaction, since the two regioisomeric ene products
are equally likely oxidized by the nitroso enophile. This
was confirmed by a control experiment for the regio-
isomeric ene products derived from the ene reaction of
E- and Z-3-methyl-2-pentene.11
ment of twin deuterium-labeled alkenes with different
lone substituents (Figure 2). Compared to the parent
2-methyl-2-butene substrate, enhanced twix regioselec-
tivity is expected as a result of steric obstruction by the
lone group along the TStwin approach.
Generally, in contrast to the ArNO enophile, a lower
regioselectivity is observed in the ene reaction of 1O2 and
TAD with simple alkenes.2,6 However, in the case of
styrenes with the aryl group at the lone position, en-
hanced twix regioselectivity was reported.7 This observa-
tion was rationalized in terms of coordination between
the enophile and the incipient delocalized positive charge
of the lone aryl group in TStwix, which promotes twix
hydrogen abstraction (Scheme 2). Moreover, some [4 +
2] cycloaddition occurs with these styrenes,7,8 which is
the consequence of the delocalized positive charge in the
lone aryl group of the zwitterionic intermediates (ZI),
especially when stabilized by electron-rich aryl groups
(Scheme 2, R ) OMe). Such zwitterionic intermediates
have been proposed to be responsible for the loss of
stereoselectivity in the [4 + 2] cycloaddition of MTAD to
the twix-CD3-labeled â,â-dimethyl-(p-methoxy)styrene (R
) OMe).7b
For the styrenes 1h -k with lone aryl substituents, twix
selectivity is also exclusive (>95%). Since the reactivity
of the aryl conjugated double bond in styrenes 1h -k is
lower, their conversion is less than for the alkyl-
substituted cases 1a -g. For all of these alkenes, only the
Of mechanistic interest was the assessment of the
mode selectivity (ene reaction versus [4 + 2] cycloaddi-
tion) and regioselectivity (twix versus twin) in the reac-
(6) (a) Ohashi, S.; Leong, K.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Butler, G. B. J .
Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3467-3471. (b) Adam, W.; Schwarm, M. J . Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 3129-3130.
(7) (a) Stratakis, M.; Orfanopoulos, M.; Foote C. S. J . Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 1315-1318. (b) Stratakis, M.; Hatzimarinaki, M.; Froudakis,
G. E.; Orfanopoulos, M. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3682-3687.
(8) Matsumoto, M.; Kuroda, M. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 987-
992.
(9) (a) Stephenson, L. M.; Speth, D. R. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44,
4683-4689. (b) Ayray, G.; Wong, D. J . J . Labelled Compd. Radio-
pharm. 1978, 14, 935-944.
(10) (a) Adam, W.; Bottke, N. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9846-
9847. (b) Knight, G. T.; Pepper, B. Tetrahedron 1971, 27, 6201-6208.
(c) Knight, G. T.; Loadman, M. J . R. J . Chem. Soc. B 1971, 2107-
2112.
(11) Krebs, O. Diplomarbeit, Universita¨t Wu¨rzburg, 2000.
8396 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 24, 2002