examination of reaction parameters, it was found that addition
of a catalytic amount of camphorsulfonic acid (CSA) is highly
beneficial to this transformation. Thus stirring a solution of
allylamine (7) and aldehyde (8) in MeOH (0.5 M) for 1 h
followed by introduction of isocyanoacetamide (9) and CSA
(0.05 equiv., 50 °C, 8 h) provided the oxa-bridged intermediate
(10) in over 95% isolated yield. Five chemical bonds have been
created in this multicomponent domino process by the union of
3CR/intramolecular Diels–Alder (IMDA) cycloaddition.8 For
the present work, this oxo-compound (10) did not need to be
isolated and was fragmented directly to the pyrrolopyridine by
addition of TFA at 278 °C. Over all, the pyrrolopyridine 11 was
produced in over 90% yield from three readily available inputs
by the union of 3CR/IMDA/fragmentation process.
Oxidation of sulfide 11 under standard conditions (MCPBA,
CH2Cl2, 0 °C) proceeded smoothly to provide the correspond-
ing sulfoxide as a mixture of two diastereomers without the
concurrent formation of amine-oxides. Formation of the
7-membered benzazepine ring by Pummerer reaction proved to
be more challenging than expected. After a survey of different
reaction conditions varying electrophiles (TFFA, pTsOH,
TMSOTf), bases, temperature and stoichiometries, the optimal
conditions found consisted of using TMSOTf (5.0 equiv.) as an
activator in dichloromethane (0.1 M) in the presence of Hunig’s
base (DIEA, 5.2 equiv., 220 °C).9 Under these conditions, two
separable diastereoisomers of tetracycle 5 (ratio = 2+1) were
isolated in 88% yield.† The relative stereochemistry of the
major isomer (JH1-H2 = 5.7 Hz) was deduced to be (1S*, 2R*)
by comparison with the literature date.10 To the best of our
knowledge, this represents one of the rare examples wherein a
Pummerer-type cyclization was performed in the presence of
basic nitrogen atoms within the same molecule.11
The same sequence was applied to the synthesis of a
tetracycle (6-6-5-6 fused ring) containing both the tetra-
hydroisoquinoline and pyrrolopyridine systems (Scheme 2).
Compound 6 was obtained in the form of two separable
diastereomers in three steps with an excellent overall yield
(83%).
In conclusion, we developed a three-step synthesis of
lennoxamine type tetracyclic compounds from readily available
starting materials. The combined use of MCR and the
Pummerer reaction characterized the present synthetic ap-
proach. The synthesis creates three heterocycles and delivers at
least three elements of diversity into the final polycycles with
the introduction of two functional groups (ester and sulfide)
susceptible for additional chemical manipulations. Further
applications of such strategy in the synthesis of complex natural
product-like compound libraries are in progress.
Financial support from CONACYT to Dr R. G. M. and
CNRS are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Professor E.
González-Zamora for fruitful discussions.
Notes and references
† 5a (1S*, 2R*), yield 58%: IR (CHCl3) n 3017, 2938, 2856, 1725, 1603,
1515, 1465, 1264, 1113 cm21; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.44-7.19 (m,
10H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 5.86 (s, 1H), 4.68 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (d, J = 14.0
Hz, 1H), 4.43-4.29 (m, 3H), 4.34 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 4.23-4.18 (m, 2H),
3.88 (s, 3H), 3.77-3.65 (m, 5H), 3.46 (s, 3H), 3.53-3.40 (m, 1H), 3.15 (m,
1H), 2.87-2.99 (m, 4H), 2.75 (dd, J = 14.0 Hz, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.0
Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 166.9, 160.3, 159.3, 147.7, 146.5,
141.3, 140.4, 135.7, 134.4, 133.5, 130.8, 129.5, 129.2, 128.9, 128.6, 128.2,
128.0, 126.0, 113.6, 112.9, 68.5, 67.6, 61.9, 60.5, 56.4, 55.9, 55.4, 53.0,
51.0, 40.3, 32.4, 14.3; MS (ES+): m/z 652 (M+, 100%). 5b (1R*, 2R*), yield
31%. IR (CHCl3) n 2928, 2855, 1697, 1602, 1517, 1363, 1286, 1201, 909
cm21; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.33–7.41 (m, 10H), 6.69 (s, 1H), 6.14
(s, 1H), 4.90 (s, 1H), 4.52 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H),
4.37 (m, 1H), 4.30 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (s, 1H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.76-3.60
(m, 5H), 3.53 (s, 3H), 3.38 (m, 1H), 3.11–2.72 (m, 7H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.0 Hz,
3H); 13C NMR (62.5 MHz, CDCl3) d 167.1, 159.7, 158.0, 147.2, 145.8,
141.7, 140.3, 135.9, 134.5, 133.9, 133.3, 132.9, 130.5, 128.6, 128.4, 128.4,
127.2, 126.0, 114.9, 114.0, 71.8, 67.7, 62.0, 59.9, 56.7, 55.9, 55.8, 54.2,
51.1, 40.3, 36.8, 14.4; MS (ES+): m/z 652 (M+, 100%).
1 E. Valencia, A. J. Freyer, M. Shamma and V. Fajardo, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1984, 25, 599–602.
2 Synthesis of lennoxamine, see (a) J. R. Fuchs and R. L. Funk, Org. Lett.,
2001, 3, 3923–3925; (b) A. Padwa, L. S. Beall, C. K. Eidell and K. J.
Worsencorft, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 2414–2421; (c) A. Couture, E.
Deniau, P. Grandclaudon and C. Hoarau, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56,
1491–1499; (d) S. Ruchirawat and P. Sahakitpichan, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2001, 41, 8007–8010; (e) Y. Koseki, S. Kusano, H. Sakata and T.
Nagasaka, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 40, 2169–2172; (f) A. Korenova, P.
Netchitailo and B. Decroix, J. Heterocyclic Chem., 1998, 35, 9–12; (g)
G. Rodríguez, M. M. Cid, C. Saá, L. Castedo and D. Domínguez, J. Org.
Chem., 1996, 61, 2780–2782; (h) F. G. Fang, M. E. Maier, S. J.
Danishefsky and G. Schulte, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 831–838; (i) C. J.
Moody and G. J. Warrellow, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 6089–6092;
(j) E. Napolitani, G. Spinelli, R. Fiaschi and A. Marsili, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans 1, 1986, 785–787; (k) S. Teitel, W. Klotzer, J. Borgese and
A. Brossi, Can. J. Chem., 1972, 50, 2022–2024.
3 Recent synthesis of isoindoloisoquinolinones, see: (a) A. R. Katritzky,
H.-Y. He and R. Jiang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 2831–2833; (b) A.
R. Katritzky, S. Mehta and H.-Y. He, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66,
3158–3175.
4 (a) S. L. Schreiber, Science, 2000, 287, 1964–1969; (b) P. Arya, D. T.
H. Chou and M. G. Baek, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2001, 40,
339–346; (c) D. G. Hall, S. Manku and F. Wang, J. Comb. Chem., 2001,
3, 125–150.
5 (a) A. Dömling and I. Ugi., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3168; (b)
H. Bienaymé, C. Hulme, G. Oddon and P. Schmidtt, Chem. Eur. J.,
2000, 6, 3321–3329; (c) G. H. Posner, Chem. Rev., 1986, 86,
831–844.
6 A. Padwa and A. G. Waterson, Curr. Org. Chem., 2002, 4, 175–203.
7 (a) X. Sun, P. Janvier, G. Zhao, H. Bienaymé and J. Zhu, Org. Lett.,
2001, 3, 877–880; (b) G. Zhao, X. Sun, H. Bienaymé and J. Zhu., J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 6700–6701; (c) E. González–Zamora, A. Fayol,
M. Bois–Choussy, A. Chiaroni and J. Zhu, Chem. Commun., 2001,
1684–1685; (d) P. Janvier, X. Sun, H. Bienaymé and J. Zhu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 2560–2567; (e) R. Gámez–Montaño, E.
González–Zamora, P. Potier and J. Zhu, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58,
6351–6358.
8 For Union concept proposed by Ugi, see ref 5a.
9 D. Craig, K. Daniels and A. R. MacKenize, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48,
7803–7816.
10 H. Ishibashi, H. Kawanami and M. Ikada, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans
1, 1997, 817–821.
11 See for example: M. Amat, S. Hadida, G. Pshenichnyi and J. Bosch, J.
Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 3158–3175.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: a) MeOH, CSA (0.1 equiv.), 50 °C, 8
h, then TFA, 278 °C, 94%; b) MCPBA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 98%; c) TMSOTf,
DIEA, CH2Cl2, 220 °C, 90%.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2448–2449
2449