1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition to the Fe-OdC Fragment
Organometallics, Vol. 21, No. 25, 2002 5637
and ketone C(7) atoms show coordination shifts of 14-
16 and 21-37 ppm, respectively, to lower frequency as
a result of extensive π-back-donation from the iron into
the low lying π*-orbital of the R-iminoketone. Compared
to the resonances of the imine and ketone carbon atoms
in the precursor complexes 1a ,b, an additional shift of
2-7 ppm (CdN) and 4-12 ppm (CdO) to lower fre-
quency is observed in complexes 7. The shifts clearly
reflect the σ-donor capacity of the phosphorus ligand
used; that is, the shifts increase in the order P(OMe)3
< PPh3, PEt3 ≈ P(nPr)3 < DPPE. Comparable shifts to
lower frequency have been observed for the imine carbon
atoms in Fe(CO)3(R1-DAB) upon substitution of one31
or three4 CO ligands for the more σ-donating/less
π-accepting isocyanide ligands. Like in the precursor
complexes 1a ,b, the larger shifts of the ketone carbon
in comparison with the imine carbon atom indicate that
the chelate coordination exerts a larger effect on the
ketone carbon atom. This may be related to the observed
regioselective addition over the Fe-OdC fragment.
As a result of enhanced π-back-donation the reso-
nances of the remaining terminal CO ligand(s) in 7 are
shifted to higher frequency. As expected, the shift
increases in the order P(OMe)3 < PPh3, PEt3 ≈ P(nPr)3
< DPPE, reflecting the σ-donor capacity of the phos-
phorus ligand. The two terminal CO carbons C(19) and
C(19′) in Fe(CO)2(PR3)(imket) (7a k -n ,bk ,bm ) are iden-
tical on the NMR time scale down to 193 K; that is, they
are observed as one doublet due to coupling with
phosphorus. This may be explained by Berry pseudoro-
tations32,33 which scramble the CO ligands and inter-
change the two faces of the R-iminoketone ligand.
Similar observations have been reported for the CO
ligands in M(CO)3(R1-DAB) (M ) Fe,34 Ru35), Fe(CO)2-
(CNR)(R1-DAB),31 and Fe(CO)3(R-iminoketone)5 and for
the CNR ligands in Fe(CNR)3(R1-DAB).4
with PEt3 coordinated in an apical position and P-Fe-
C(O) angles of 80°. Since very small P,C coupling
constants are observed on the terminal carbonyl car-
bons, this geometry is probably preserved in solution.
Furthermore, these complexes do not show P,C coupling
on the imine carbon atoms. In all complexes 7 a
3
relatively large J (P,C) coupling constant (6-10.6 Hz)
on the ketone carbon atom C(7) is found. Only in the
case of complexes 7 containing ligand b is a 3J (P,C)
coupling (3.8-6.0 Hz) on the imine carbon C(8) ob-
served. A similar effect is found for complexes 8.
To explain the P,C coupling constants found for
complexes 7bk ,bm , a distorted sqp geometry is pro-
posed, as shown in Figure 2 (isomer A). The PR3 is
probably somewhat bent away from the N-Fe-O plane,
3
which might explain the rather large J (P,C) coupling
on the ketone carbon C(7). Obviously, due to this
deformation, also the P-Fe-CO angles change com-
pared to those in Fe(CO)2(PEt3)(p-anisyl-DAB), which
results in somewhat larger P,C coupling constants on
the terminal carbonyl carbons C(19) and C(19′). It has
been shown that 1b (X-ray)16 has approximately a
square pyramidal geometry (89% along the Berry pseu-
dorotation axes)37 in which the nitrogen of the R-imi-
noketone occupies a basal and the oxygen an apical
position. The two isomeric forms of 7bk , seen in the IR,
may thus be explained by interconversion between a
basal (N)-basal (O) and a basal (N)-apical (O) coordi-
nation of the R-iminoketone. However, because on
average relatively small coupling constants are found
on C(19) and C(19′), the P(OMe)3 is apparently coordi-
nated in a cis fashion to both CO ligands (isomer B),
i.e., trans to the nitrogen σ-donor. This agrees well with
the observation that only with the weakest P-donor,
P(OMe)3, isomer B is detected.
In complexes 7a k -n significantly larger coupling
constants are found on C(19) and C(19′). This may be
rationalized by a molecular geometry closely approach-
ing a trigonal bipyramidal (tbp) structure and placing
the phosphorus in an equatorial position (cf. Figure 2,
isomer C). Because the two CO ligands rapidly inter-
change positions, the large equatorial coupling constant
contributes strongly to the observed averaged value. The
change to a tbp structure is in agreement with the
decreased π-acceptor capacity of ligand a in comparison
with that of b. From X-ray studies of five-coordinate Fe-
(R-diimine) complexes it is known31,36,38,39 that their
geometries change from near tbp to sqp with increasing
π-acceptor capacity of the R-diimine.
Interestingly, the 2J (P,C) coupling constants on C(19)
and C(19′) differ significantly between the Fe(CO)2(PR3)-
(imket) complexes 7a k -n and 7bk ,bm , respectively.
This might indicate that these complexes have different
coordination geometries and/or have a different ligand
arrangement. This is supported by the difference in the
31P chemical shifts of 7a k -n and 7bk -n . Complexes
7bl and 7bn are characterized only by 31P NMR and
IR. For complexes 7bk , bm relatively small P,C coupling
constants of 9.1 (7bm ) and 17.5 Hz (7bk ) are observed
on the terminal carbonyl carbons C(19) and C(19′). In
the corresponding complexes 7a k -n these coupling
constants are approximately twice as large and lie
between 21.8 (7a l-n ) and 36.2 Hz (7a k ). The isostruc-
tural Fe(CO)2(PR3)(R1-DAB)36 (R1 ) iPr, p-anisyl) com-
plexes show even smaller P,C coupling constants on the
terminal carbonyl carbon atoms which lie between 4.2
Hz (R ) Me, Et) and 8.4 Hz (R ) OMe). The solid state
structure of Fe(CO)2(PEt3)(p-anisyl-DAB) showed that
this complex has a square pyramidal (sqp) geometry
The coupling constants of 7a o,bo are almost equal,
which indicates that they probably have the same ligand
arrangement. Interestingly, analogous to the ketone
carbon C(7), the carbonyl carbon C(19) in Fe(CO)-
(DPPE)(imket) (7a o,bo) is observed as a triplet due to
the coupling with phosphorus. This indicates that the
DPPE phosphorus atoms are equivalent, which is
confirmed by the singlet observed in the 31P NMR for
the two DPPE phosphorus atoms. Since the R-iminoke-
(31) de Lange, P. P. M.; Kraakman, M. J . A.; van Wijnkoop, M.;
Fru¨hauf, H.-W.; Vrieze, K.; Smeets, W. J . J .; Spek, A. L. Inorg. Chim.
Acta 1992, 196, 151-160.
(32) Albright, T. A.; Hoffmann, R.; Thibeault, J . C.; Thorn, D. L. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3801.
(33) Berry, R. S. Chem. Phys. 1960, 32, 933.
(34) Leibfritz, D.; tom Dieck, H. J . Organomet. Chem. 1976, 105,
255.
(37) Holmes, R. R. In Progress in Inorganic Chemistry; Lippard, S.
J ., Ed.; Wiley: Cambridge, MA, 1984; Vol. 32, pp 119-236.
(38) De Paoli, M. A.; Fru¨hauf, H.-W.; Grevels, F.-W.; Koerner von
Gustorf, E. A.; Riemer, W.; Kru¨ger, C. J . Organomet. Chem. 1977, 136,
219-233.
(35) Mul, W. P.; Elsevier: C. J .; Fru¨hauf, H.-W.; Vrieze, K.; Pein,
I.; Zoutberg, M. C.; Stam, C. H. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 2336-2345.
(36) Fru¨hauf, H.-W.; Pein, I. Unpublished results, 1988.
(39) Kokkes, M.; Stufkens, D. J .; Oskam, A. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1983, 439.