´
H. Bienayme et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 4830–4833
4833
2. Baez, M.; Yu, L.; Cohen, M. L. Mol. Pharmacol 1990, 38,
31.
3. Kursar, J. D.; Nelson, D. L.; Wainscott, D. B.; Cohen, M.
L.; Baez, M. Mol. Pharmacol. 1992, 42, 549.
4. Humphrey, P. P. A.; Hartig, P.; Hoyer, D. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 1993, 14, 233.
5. Hoyer, D.; Clarke, D. E.; Fozard, J. R.; Hartig, P. R.;
Martin, G. R.; Mylecharane, E. J.; Saxena, P. R.;
Humphrey, P. P. A. Pharmacol. Rev. 1994, 46, 157.
6. Baxter, G.; Kennett, G.; Blaney, F.; Blackburn, T. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 1995, 16, 105.
compound followed by the addition of the agonist
(a-methyl-5-HT) at a concentration corresponding to its
EC80 of the day. The luminescence, related to calcium
release, was measured for 30 s following the agonist
addition. Inhibition percentage of the luminescence was
measured and IC50 evaluated for active compounds.
18. Annigeri, A. C.; Siddappa, S. Indian J. Chem., Sect B
1963, 1, 484.
19. Pathak, V. N.; Pathak, R.; Gupta, R.; Oza, C. K. Synth.
Commun. 1997, 27, 1811.
20. Characterization data for compound 45: (mp 130.1–
131.3 ꢁC); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): dH (ppm),
7.62–7.58 (m, 2H, CHarom), 7.12–7.08 (m, 1H, CHarom),
7. Hoyer, D.; Martin, G. Neuropharmacology 1997, 36, 419.
ˆ ´
8. Latil, A.; Chene, L.; Grisoni, S.; Bienayme, H. WO Patent
2004061408, 2004.
7.04–6.97 (m, 3H, CHarom), 6.91 (dt, 1H, CHarom
J1 = 1.01 Hz, J2 = 7.58 Hz), 6.77 (dd, 1H, CHarom
J1 = 1.01 Hz, J2 = 8.08 Hz), 5.08 (d, 1H, CHpyrazoline
,
,
,
9. Berger, J.; Flippin, L. A.; Greenhouse, R.; Jaime-Figueroa
S.; Liu, Y.; Miller, A. K.; Putman, D. G.; Weinhardt K.
K.; Zhao, S. WO Patent 9744326, 1997.
10. Audia, J. E.; Baker, S. R.; Ezquerra, J.; Lamas, C.;
Pedregal, C. WO Patent 9624351, 1996.
J = 9.35 Hz), 3.51–3.45 (m, 1H, CHpyrazoline), 3.23 (dd,
1H, CHpyrazoline, J1 = 1.26 Hz, J2 = 15.92 Hz), 2.84–2.79
(m, 1H, CH), 2.68–2.59 (m, 3H, CH), 2.50 (m, 1H, CH),
2.40–2.36 (m, 3H, CH), 2.11–2.01 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.60–1.51
(m, 2H, CH2), 0.92 (t, 3H, CH3, J = 7.33 Hz); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d (ppm), 163.1 (d, J = 248.82 Hz),
152.2, 150.7, 129.1, 129.1, 128.2, 128.1, 127.0, 126.4, 123.3,
121.3, 117.5, 115.4, 115.2, 88.1, 60.5, 56.5, 49.6, 49.4, 41.0,
34.8, 32.4, 20.4, 12.1; LC/MS (EI, m/z): (M+l) 380.28; Rf
(10% MeOH in DCM) = 0.52.
´
11. Launay, J. M.; Herve, P.; Peoc’h, K.; Tournois, C.;
Callebert, J.; Nebigil, C. G.; Etienne, N.; Drouet, L.;
Humbert, M.; Simonneau, G.; Maroteaux, L. Nat. Med.
2002, 8, 1129.
12. Bonhaus, D. W.; Bach, C.; Desouza, A.; Salazar, F. H.;
Matsuoka, B. D.; Zuppan, P.; Chan, H. W.; Eglen, R. M.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 1995, 115, 622.
13. Baxter, G. S. Behav. Brain Res. 1996, 73, 149.
14. Audia, J. E.; Evard, D. A.; Murdoch, G. R.; Droste, J. J.;
Nissen, J. S.; Schenck, K. W.; Fludzinski, P.; Lucaites, V.
L.; Nelson, D. L.; Cohen, M. L. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39,
2773.
21. HPLC experiments were carried out using a Waters HPLC
system equipped with a Quaternary Pump 600 E Multisol-
vent Delivery System, a Waters 996 Photodiode Array
Detector, aWaters 2767 Sample Manager, a make-up
pump Waters Reagent Manager (100% MeOH, flow rate
15. Bonhaus, D. W.; Flippin, L. A.; Greenhouse, R. J.; Jaime,
S.; Rocha, C.; Dawson, M.; Van Natta, K.; Chang, L. K.;
Pulido-Rios, T.; Webber, A.; Leung, E.; Eglen, R. M.;
Martin, G. R. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 127, 1075.
16. The selection has been made creating a chemofilter of
autocorrelative vectors (Oto program) by discriminant
analysis from a set of 167 published selective and not
selective 5-HT2B ligands extracted from Aureus Pharma
database. The confidence of the assay was 92% well
identified compared to 63% in the random case. A virtual
screening was conducted with this filter on an internal
collection of 30,000 compounds driving to the set of 1250
small molecules.
1 ml/min), and a preparative/analytical splitter from
LCPackings with a 1/1000 split. The system was run with
MassLynx 3.5 configured with OpenLynx 3.5 and Frac-
tionLynx 3.5. The chiral stationary phases (CSP) were
Chiralpak AD-H, 5 lm. Analytical and preparative assays
were carried out on 250 · 4.6 mm ID and 250 · 20 mm ID
columns, respectively. Flow rates were 1 ml/min and
19 ml/min, respectively. Samples were dissolved in MeOH
(36 mg/ml). Enantiomers were resolved on a semi-pre-
parative scale. Fraction collections were triggered by the
DAD TIC signal (210–500 nm). The HPLC analytical
assay was performed using mixtures of acetonitrile/2-
propanol/diethylamine (85:15:0.1) as eluent. The retention
17. Screening protocol (Euroscreen): CHO cells expressing
5-HT2B receptors, aequorin, and Ga16 were seeded in
poly-D-lysine coated plates with coelentterazine and fetal
serum albumin. After 15-h incubation at rt, the cell
suspension was incubated for 30 min with the tested
time of the 2 enantiomers was tR1 = 4.2 min and
tR2 = 5.2 min.
tR1
tR2
k10
0.24
k20
a
w1
w2
Rs
4.2
5.2
0.53
2.2
0.30
0.47
1.53