Chemistry Letters 2002
935
The structure of 1a was confirmed by the X-ray crystal
analysis as shown in Figure 1.8 The intramolecular distances
between bridged aromatic carbons, C4–C15 and C10–C18, are
Electronic absorption spectra of carbazolophanes and the
references were measured in THF. The absorption spectra of 1a
around 300 to 380 nm exhibited broadening and bathochromic
shift compared with 6 suggesting the existence of transannular ꢀ–
ꢀ electronic interaction. Similar trend was observed for 1b,
though the extent of broadening and bathochromic shift were
slightly larger than those for 1a. These results can be interpreted
by means of the exciton coupling interaction9 and the strain of the
carbazole chromophore which was revealed by the X-ray
analysis.
ꢀ
ꢀ
2.99 A and 2.97 A, respectively. The angle between right (C1–
C6) and left (C7–C12) side benzene in carbazole ring is as much
as 40 ꢁ as shown in Figure 1, while the upper benzene ring kept the
planarity. To our knowledge, this angle is the largest of all the
carbazole derivatives ever reported. Reflecting strong deforma-
ꢀ
tion from the conjugated plane, the distanceof C16–C3(3.22 A) is
ꢀ
shorter than that of C16–C2 (3.48 A). X-ray analysis of 1a
corresponded to the behavior of the chemical shifts of aromatic
protons in solution. Therefore, 1a remained the rigid structure
even in solution. From the comparison of the chemical shift
differences (Áꢁ) of 1a and 1b from the corresponding references
as shown in Table 1, 1b will be also rigid and the geometry of the
carbazole and the naphthalene is taken to be of anti-conformation.
In summary, both [2.2]paracyclo(3,6)carbazolophane 1a and
[2.2](1,4)naphthaleno(3,6)carbazolophane 1b were first prepared
by the photodeselenation of 5a and 5b, respectively. Their
chemical and physical properties were invetigated.10 It was also
found that the carbazole ring in 1a is able to endure the strong
deformation in the rigid [2.2]cyclophane framework.
References and Notes
1J. M. Pearson and M. Stolka, ‘‘Poly( N-vinylcarbazole),’’
Gordon and Breach Sci. Pub., New York (1981).
2
a) K. Tani, Y. Tohda, K. Hisada, and M. Yamamoto, Chem.
Lett., 1996, 145. b) Y. Nakamura, M. Kaneko, N. Yamanaka,
K. Tani, and J. Nishimura, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 4693 (1999).
c) K. Tani, Y. Tohda, H. Takemura, H. Ohkita, S. Ito, and M.
Yamamoto, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 2001, 1914. d)
H. Ohkita, S. Ito, M. Yamamoto, Y. Tohda, and K. Tani, J.
Phys. Chem. A, 106, 2140 (2002).
3
4
5
For example: P. M. Keehn and S. M. Rosenfeld, ‘‘Cyclo-
phanes,’’ Academic Press, New York (1983); F. Vogtle,
¨
‘‘Cyclophane Chemistry,’’ Wiley, Chichester (1989); F.
Diederich, ‘‘Cyclophanes,’’ The Royal Society of Chemistry,
Cambridge (1991).
a) K. Tani, H. Seo, M. Maeda, K. Imagawa, N. Nishiwaki, M.
Ariga, Y. Tohda, H. Higuchi, and K. Kuma, Tetrahedron
Lett., 36, 1883 (1995). b) H. Higuchi, K. Tani, T. Otsubo, Y.
Sakata, and S. Misumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 60, 4027
(1987).
3: dec. 139–141 ꢁC, 1H NMR (CDCl3, ꢁ): 1.44 (t, J ¼ 7:2 Hz,
3H), 4.36 (q, J ¼ 7:2 Hz, 2H), 4.59 (s, 4H), 7.40 (d,
J ¼ 8:4 Hz, 2H, H1), 7.49 (dd, J ¼ 8:4 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 2H, H2),
8.08 (d, J ¼ 1:6 Hz, 2H, H4). Anal. Calcd for C18H15N3Se2:
C, 50.13; H, 3.51; N, 9.74%. Found: C, 49.85; H, 3.43; N,
9.49%.
Figure 1. X-ray analysis of 1a.
6
7
8
1a: mp 164–165 ꢁC: Anal. Calcd for C24H23N: C, 88.57; H,
7.12; N, 4.30%. Found : C, 88.29; H, 7.07; N, 4.29%.
1b: mp 197–199 ꢁC: Anal. Calcd for C28H25N: C, 89.56; H,
6.71; N, 3.73%. Found : C, 89.40; H, 6.69; N, 3.58%.
Crystal Data for 1a: colorless prism (benzene-hexane),
Mr ¼ 325:45, monoclinic, space group P21/c, a ¼
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
5:722ð2Þ A, b ¼ 17:471ð2Þ A, c ¼ 18:109ð2Þ A, ꢂ ¼
ꢀ 3
ꢁ
94:92ð2Þ , V ¼ 1803:7ð8Þ A , Z ¼ 4, Dcalc ¼ 1:198 g/cm3,
ꢃðMo KꢄÞ ¼ 0:69 cmÀ1, Rigaku AFC7R diffractometer,
1866 reflections with I > 3:0ꢅðIÞ, R ¼ 0:046, Rw ¼ 0:032.
M. Kasha, H. R. Rawls, and M. A. El-Bayoumi, Pure Appl.
Chem., 11, 371(1965).
9
10 The emission properties of 1a and 1b are of particular interest
and will be reported in a separated paper.
Figure 2. Electronic absorption spectra in THF.