C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
cm-1 band assigned to HXeO grew similarly to the experiments
with water. It was shown that the formation of the 1466.1 cm-1
band requires simultaneous doping with both HBr and N2O. The
additional species seen in the IR absorption spectra after annealing
are HXeH, HXeBr, HO2, and O3. These experiments with HBr/
N2O/Xe samples strongly confirm that the species absorbing at
1466.1 cm-1 is formed from H and O atoms.
2.31 Å.23 The exact boundaries between chemical compounds and
van der Waals complexes are not absolutely clear, and accurate
analysis is always needed.4 It is worth noting in this respect that
the computational Xe-F distances are 1.904 Å in XeF+ and 2.146
Å in HXeF,24 which are clearly shorter than in the XeF complex.
The identification of HXeO (2Σ) suggests that analogous radicals
with other rare-gas elements should be searched for. Both HKrO
and HArO are computationally stable species. The H-Ar distance
in HArO is 1.343 Å at the CCSD(T) level of theory, which is
slightly shorter than the corresponding value of 1.355 Å for HArF,24
and the Ar-O distance is 2.021 Å. In HKrO, the H-Kr and Kr-O
distances are 1.490 and 2.087 Å [CCSD(T)]. Direct preparation of
HKrO and HArO using the method described here is problematic
due to the questionable stability of O (1D) atoms in Kr and Ar
solids. However, their probable existence is intriguing, especially
for HArO that might be found in the atmospheres.
In conclusion, the presented data allow us to claim the identifica-
tion of an open-shell triatomic chemical compound containing
xenon, HXeO (2Σ). The HXeO species is prepared by using UV
photolysis of H2O/Xe or N2O/HBr/Xe solid mixtures at 7 K and
subsequent thermal mobilization of oxygen atoms at g30 K. The
calculated stabilization barrier is 213 meV at the MRCISD/aug-
cc-pVTZ level of theory. The HXeO (2Σ) radical forms presumably
in the H + Xe + O (1D) reaction, and it is higher in energy (by
∼1 eV) than the H + Xe + O (3P) triad.
The experimental assignment of HXeO is fully supported by ab
initio quantum chemical calculations performed at the MP2/LJ18/
6-311++G(2d,2p) and CCSD(T)/LJ18/6-311++G(2d,2p) levels of
theory.7 HXeO is computationally a true energy minimum exhibiting
a linear structure with H-Xe and Xe-O distances of 1.652 and
2.171 Å (MP2) and 1.694 and 2.153 Å [CCSD(T)], respectively.
These bond lengths are slightly shorter than the corresponding
distances in HXeOH, which are 1.740 and 2.218 Å at the same
CCSD(T) level.10 The H-Xe and Xe-O distances in HXeO are
close to the corresponding values in XeH+ (1.603 Å)17 and in XeO
(1Σ+) (2.06 Å).18 The natural bond orbital analysis indicates a strong
ionic character of HXeO, with a positive charge on the Xe atom
(+0.88) and a negative charge on the O atom (-0.90). The H-Xe
stretching frequency is 1681 cm-1 at the CCSD(T) level of theory.
The agreement with the experimental value of 1466 cm-1 is very
reasonable, taking into account similar overestimates for H-Rg
stretching frequencies of other known HRgY molecules by this
harmonic theory.7 The bending modes are computationally at 580
cm-1, and the Xe-O stretching mode is at 382 cm-1. Estimated at
the MP2 theory level, the intensity of the H-Xe stretching mode
is 309 km/mol, which is ∼5 times smaller than that of HXeOH.
This would suggest that the concentrations of HXeO and HXeOH
are similar in the H2O/Xe experiments (see Figure 1), and the
formation of HXeO makes an important product channel upon
annealing of photolyzed H2O/Xe samples. The MP2 calculations
yield a much smaller intensity for the bending modes (6 km/mol),
which explains their invisibility in the experiments similarly to the
situation with HXeOH,9,10 and the Xe-O stretching has an intensity
of 185 km/mol.
Acknowledgment. We thank V. Feldman for helpful discus-
sions. The Academy of Finland supported this work. CSC (Espoo,
Finland) is thanked for computing resources.
References
(1) Bartlett, N. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1962, 218.
(2) Turner, J. J.; Pimentel, G. C. Science 1963, 140, 974-975.
(3) Khriachtchev, L.; Pettersson, M.; Runeberg, N.; Lundell, J.; Ra¨sa¨nen, M.
Nature (London) 2000, 406, 874-876.
(4) Pyykko¨, P. Science 2000, 290, 64-65.
(5) Christe, K. O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1419-1421.
(6) Li, J.; Bursten, B. E.; Liang, B.; Andrews, L. Science 2002, 295, 2242-
2245.
The dissociation of HXeO (2Σ) to the atomic products correlates
with the singlet oxygen (1D) potential surface meaning that the H
+ Xe + O (1D) reaction can lead to HXeO which is 1.52 eV lower
in energy [CCSD(T)]. In contrast, the H + Xe + O (3P) triad is
much lower in energy than HXeO (by ∼1.01 eV), which suggests
that the O (3P) atoms are energetically incapable of forming the
HXeO radical. The diffusion-controlled formation of HXeO at 30-
35 K indicates the presence of O (1D) atoms in the Xe lattice. It
follows that solid Xe can provide storage for the O (1D) atoms,
and they move upon thermal annealing at g30 K. This agrees with
the discussions on favorable stabilization of the O (1D) atoms in
Xe lattice compared with O (3P).19
(7) Lundell, J.; Khriachtchev, L.; Pettersson, M.; Ra¨sa¨nen, M. Low Temp.
Phys. 2000, 26, 680-690.
(8) Berski, S.; Silvi, B.; Lundell, J.; Noury, S.; Latajka, Z. In New Trends in
Quantum Systems in Chemistry and Physics; Maruani, J. et al., Eds.;
Kluwer: Dordrecht, 2001; Vol. 1, pp 259-279.
(9) Khriachtchev, L.; Tanskanen, H.; Pettersson, M.; Ra¨sa¨nen, M.; Ahokas,
J.; Kunttu, H.; Feldman, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 5649-5656.
(10) Pettersson, M.; Khriachtchev, L.; Lundell, J.; Ra¨sa¨nen, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 11904-11905.
(11) Goodman, J.; Brus, L. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 4858-4865.
(12) Creuzburg, M.; Koch, F.; Wittl, F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 156, 387-
391.
(13) Lawrence, W. G.; Apkarian, V. A. J. Chem. Phys, 1992, 97, 2229-2236.
(14) Pettersson, M.; Nieminen, J.; Khriachtchev, L.; Ra¨sa¨nen, M. J. Chem.
Phys. 1997, 107, 8423-8431.
(15) Danilychev, A. V.: Apkarian, V. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 8617-
8627.
To check the energetic stability of HXeO with respect to the H
+ XeO (1Σ+) channel, computations at the valence MRCISD/aug-
cc-pVTZ level of theory were performed. It was found that HXeO
is lower in energy than H + XeO (1Σ+) by 137 meV, and it is
additionally stabilized by 76 meV due to crossing of the neutral
and charge-transfer potential surfaces, which means a stabilization
barrier of 213 meV (20.6 kJ/mol). This energetics qualitatively
corresponds to the computational results on HArF.20
(16) Khriachtchev, L.; Lundell, J.; Pettersson, M.; Tanskanen, H.; Ra¨sa¨nen,
M. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 4758-4761.
(17) Rogers, S. A.; Brazier, C. R.; Bernath, P. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87,
159-162.
(18) Yamanishi, M.; Hirao, K.; Yamashita, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 1514-
1521.
(19) Danilychev, A. V.; Apkarian, V. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5556-
5566.
(20) Runeberg, N.; Pettersson, M.; Khriachtchev, L.; Lundell, J.; Ra¨sa¨nen M.
J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 836-841.
(21) Stein, L.; Norris, J. R.; Downs, A. J.; Minihan, A. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1978, 502-504.
HXeO is an open-shell species (2Σ), which makes it rather
exceptional among neutral rare-gas compounds. The known open-
(22) Filippi, A.; Troiani, A.; Speranza, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 9344-
9350.
(23) Aquilanti, V.; Luzzatti, E.; Pirani, F.; Volpi, G. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1988,
89, 6165-6175.
shell species with rare-gas atoms are mainly radical cations, such
+ 21
as Xe2
and XeO+.22 A good candidate for a neutral open-shell
(24) Lundell, J.; Chaban, G. M.; Gerber, R. B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 331,
308-316.
species containing rare-gas atoms seems to be the XeF complex,
which has a dissociation energy of 145 meV and a bond length of
JA029024R
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 6, 2003 1455