rearrangement and transannular oxymercuration. Most im-
portantly, the absolute stereochemistry resident in the sugar
is transformed efficiently and specifically into the hetero-
cyclic product.
Scheme 1
The highly reactive complex generated in situ by treating
solutions of Cp2ZrCl2 with n-BuLi in toluene or THF12 is
often referred to as “zirconocene” and depicted simply as
“Cp2Zr”.13 One of the key properties of this reagent is its
ability to enter into ligand exchange with unsaturated
compounds. If the substrate is an allylic ether, the high
oxophilicity of the zirconium atom subsequently manifests
itself via â-elimination of the alkoxy group.14 Reaction of
Cp2Zr with vinyl sugars in the presence of boron trifluoride
etherate results in extrusion of the oxygen atom and
formation of a highly functionalized carbocyclic ring, often
with high levels of diastereodifferentiation.10,11 For the
present purposes, the goal was to generate 2,3,4-trisubstituted
cyclobutanones such as 7 in advance of the stereocontrolled
1,2-addition of an acetylide anion, thermal activation of 6
so produced to deliver 5, and ultimate conversion to 3 and/
or 4 via intramolecular Hg(II)-promoted cyclization15 (Scheme
1). Indeed, highly functionalized oxabicyclics of type 3 and
4 are attainable from D-arabinose and D-glucose via this
protocol.
The tert-butylsiloxy substituent in 11 must be R-oriented
in the vinyl group. An assessment of this requirement
demands that carbinol 8, which is readily available from
D-arabinose,11,16 be initially subjected to sequential Dess-
Martin oxidation17 and NaBH4 reduction.18 The ketone
intermediate is attacked exclusively syn to the vinyl group,
such that 9a is obtained in 88% overall yield (Scheme 2).
After hydroxyl protection, pursuit of the deoxygenative ring
contraction of 9b by Cp2Zr was examined and found to
proceed too slowly to be preparatively useful. Consequently,
anomer 10 was prepared and integrated into the synthetic
pathway. In an alternative route to 10 developed simulta-
neously, D-glucose diacetonide was converted to 12a via the
Horton protocol,19 protected as the p-methoxybenzyl ether,
and selectively hydrolyzed to give the exocyclic vicinal diol.
Advancement to 13 took advantage of the reliability associ-
ated with the capability of zinc dust and NaI in hot DMF to
induce reductive elimination of the ditosylate.20-22
Exposure of 10 to Cp2Zr and BF3‚OEt2 in toluene resulted
in forward progress to deliver 11 as the only characterizable
product in 65% yield. The success of this transformation is
consistent with adoption of transition state A. The manner
in which all four cyclobutane substituents are set in a well-
defined absolute configurational sense introduces a minimum
of nonbonded steric interactions along this reaction trajectory.
Oxidation of 11 with the Dess-Martin reagent17 resulted
in formation of the cyclobutanone without loss of stereo-
chemical integrity. As hoped for,23-25 the double bond does
not migrate into conjugation with the carbonyl provided that
the use of silica gel chromatography is skirted. The appropri-
ate tactic was to add the acetylenic Grignard directly, in
which case 1,2-addition to produce 14a occurred with
complete diastereocontrol (Scheme 3).
This intermediate was, in turn transformed into diol 14b
via mild acid hydrolysis. The platform established in 14b
was responsive to ring strain effects,26,27 heating in benzene
leading smoothly to 15 in quantitative yield. The oxygen
(10) (a) Ito, H.; Motoki, Y.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 8835. (b) Hanzawa, Y.; Ito, H.; Taguchi, T. Synlett 1995,
299.
(11) Paquette, L. A.; Cunie`re, N. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1927.
(12) Negishi, E.; Cederbaum, F. E.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
27, 2829.
(13) (a) Negishi, E.; Takahashi, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 124. (b)
Negishi, E.; Takahashi, T. Synthesis 1988, 1. (c) Buchwald, S. L.; Nielsen,
R. B. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 1047.
(14) (a) Ito, H.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
1295. (b) Ito, H.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33,
7873. (c) Ito, H.; Nakamura, T.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 3769. (d) Ito, H.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y. J. Org. Chem.
1993, 58, 774.
(15) Paquette, L. A.; Bolin, D. G.; Stepanian, M.; Branan, B. M.;
Mallavadhani, U. V.; Tae, J.; Eisenberg, S. W. E.; Rogers, R. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11603.
(16) Dahlman, O.; Garegg, P. J.; Mayer, H.; Schramek, S. Acta Chem.
Scand. B 1986, 40, 15.
(17) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277,
(b) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155.
(18) Nicolaou, K. C.; Pavia, M. R.; Seitz, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
104, 2027.
(20) Tipson, R. S.; Cohen, A. Carbohydr. Res. 1965, 1, 338.
(21) Yamazaki, T.; Matsuda, K.; Sugiyama, H.; Seto, S.; Yamaoka, N.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 1981.
(22) Paquette, L. A.; Arbit, R. M.; Funel, J. A.; Bolshakov, S. Synthesis
2002, 2105.
(23) Harris, N. J.; Gajewski, J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6121.
(24) Ollivier, J.; Salaun, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 1269.
(25) Miller, S. A.; Gadwood, R. C. Org. Synth. 1989, 67, 210.
(19) Baker, D. C.; Horton, D.; Tindall, C. G., Jr. Carbohydr. Res. 1972,
24, 192.
222
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 2, 2003