4450 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 107, No. 18, 2003
Joseph et al.
constant for the static quenching of the singlet excited state of
the photophysical and DNA binding properties of these mol-
ecules. Furthermore, the viologen linked p-tolylacrdine deriva-
tive 1a, which exhibited greater affinity for DNA and oxidizes
DNA very efficiently, can have potential use as a DNA probe
and as a DNA cleaving agent that functions through the
cosensitization mechanism.
the acridine chromophore in these molecules by DNA (kDNA
)
was evaluated using eq 5,
I0/I ) 1 + kDNA/kSI
(5)
where I0 and I are the fluorescence intensities in the absence
and presence of DNA and kSI is the sum of the rate constants
(kd + kET) of the singlet excited-state deactivation.16 The kDNA
values obtained for these derivatives are summarized in Table
2. The static quenching rate constant (kDNA) for 1a was found
to be 7 × 109 s-1, whereas a lower value of 3 × 109 s-1 was
observed for the pyridinium linked derivative 2a. This observa-
tion indicates that the viologen linked p-tolylacridine derivative
1a, though, binds less efficiently but is more efficient in
oxidizing the DNA bases when compared to the corresponding
pyridinium derivative 2a.
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and Department of
Science and Technology, Government of India, for the financial
support of the work. This is contribution no. RRLT-PPD(PRU)-
159 from the Regional Research Laboratory, Trivandrum.
Supporting Information Available: Fluorescence decay
profile of 1a. This material is available free of charge via the
References and Notes
The calculated change in free energy value for the electron-
transfer reactions using oxidation potentials of DNA bases36 and
the reduction potential of acridine (∆G ) -0.64, -0.51, -0.33,
and -0.23 eV for guanine, adenine, cytosine, and thymine,
respectively) shows that all DNA bases can quench the
fluorescence of the acridine moiety by an electron-transfer
mechanism. The extent of fluorescence quenching offered by
DNA depends on the type of interaction of these molecules
undergo with DNA. In the case of the ortho-derivatives 1b and
2b, the steric effects offered by the substitutent groups prevent
the interaction of the acridine moiety with DNA. These results
suggest that the rotation around the acridine and phenyl units
is crucial in the process of intercalation of the acridine moiety
into the DNA core. In the case of the p-tolyl derivatives 1a and
2a, the rotation around these interacting units is facile when
compared to that of the sterically crowded o-tolyl derivatives,
and hence intercalation of the acridine chromophore was
observed only in the case of the para-derivatives.
(1) Bischofberger, N.; Shea, R. G. In Nucleic Acid Targeted Drug
Design; Propst, C. L., Perun, T. J., Eds.; Dekker: New York, 1992; p 579.
(2) Tidd, D. M. In Molecular Aspects of Anticancer Drug-DNA
Interactions, Vol. 1; Neidle, S., Waring, M., Eds.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL,
1993; p 272.
(3) Tullius, T. In Metal-DNA Chemistry; ACS Symposium Series 402;
American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1989.
(4) Barton, J. K. In Bioinorganic Chemistry; University Science
Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1994; p 455.
(5) Wilson, W. D.; Jones, R. L. In Intercalator Chemistry; Whittingham,
M. S., Jacobson, A. J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1982; p 445.
(6) Pullman, B.; Jortner, J. Molecular Basis of Specificity in Nucleic
Acid-Drug Interactions, Vol. 1; CRC: Ann Arbor, MI, 1993.
(7) Armitage, B.; Yu, C.; Devadoss, C.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 9847.
(8) Nielsen, P. E. Bioconjugate Chem. 1991, 2, 1.
(9) Schuster, G. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 253.
(10) Giese, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 631.
(11) Kumar, C. V.; Asuncion, E. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8547.
(12) Nakatani, K.; Sando, S.; Saito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
2172.
(13) Takenaka, S.; Ihara, T.; Takagi, M. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1.
(14) Armitage, B. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 1171 and references therein.
(15) Dunn, D. A.; Lin, V. H.; Kochevar, I. E. Biochemistry 1992, 31,
11620.
Conclusion
(16) Rogers, J. E.; Le, T. P.; Kelly, L. A. Photochem. Photobiol. 2001,
71, 223.
In summary, the absorption and cyclic voltammetry studies
of the viologen and pyridinium linked tolylacridines 1a,b and
2a,b show that there are no ground state interactions existing
between the acridine and acceptor moieties. The fluorescence
quantum yields of the viologen linked tolylacridines were found
to be lower when compared to those of the pyridinium linked
and unsubstituted tolylacridine derivatives, suggesting thereby
that the fluorescence of the acridine chromophore is efficiently
quenched by the viologen moiety in these systems. Calculated
free energy changes and bimolecular fluorescence quenching
rate constants indicate that the photoinduced electron transfer
is the predominant nonradiative pathway in these systems. The
intramolecular electron-transfer rate is found to be more efficient
in the case of the viologen linked ortho-derivative 1b when
compared to the para-derivative 1a, indicating thereby the
existence of strong through-space interactions between the
acridine and viologen moieties in the former case. DNA binding
studies showed that only the para-derivatives 1a and 2a undergo
efficient interaction with DNA while the corresponding o-
tolylacridine derivatives exhibited negligible affinity for DNA.
The static quenching rate constants by DNA (kDNA) indicate
that the viologen linked p-tolylacridine derivative 1a is a better
DNA oxidizing agent when compared to the corresponding
pyridinium derivative 2a. These results demonstrate that the tolyl
spacer group constitutes an interesting variation that controls
(17) Le, T. P.; Rogers, J. E.; Kelly, L. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104,
6778.
(18) Eldho, N. V.; Joseph, J.; Ramaiah, D. Chem. Lett. 2001, 438.
(19) Junjappa, H.; Saxena, M. K.; Ramaiah, D.; Loharay, B. B.; Rath,
N. P.; George, M. V. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9801.
(20) Sajimon, M. C.; Ramaiah, D.; Thomas, K. G.; George, M. V. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3182.
(21) Weber, G.; Teale, F. W. J. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1957, 53, 646.
(22) Scatchard, G. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1949, 51, 660.
(23) McGhee, J. D.; von Hippel, P. H. J. Mol. Biol. 1974, 86, 469.
(24) Adam, W.; Cadet, J.; Dall’Acqua, F.; Epe, B.; Ramaiah, D.; Saha-
Mo¨ller, C. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 107.
(25) Baguley, B. C.; Falkenhang, E.-M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978, 5,
101.
(26) Zhao, T.-G.; Shen, T.; Xu, H.-J. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
1990, 52, 4753.
(27) Bernthsen, A. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1884, 224, 1.
(28) Jonker, S. A.; Ariese, F.; Verhoeven, J. W. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-
Bas 1989, 108, 109.
(29) Ledwith, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 133.
(30) Mann, C. K.; Barnes, K. K. Electrochemical Reactions in Non-
aqueous Systems; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1970; p 324.
(31) Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 834.
(32) Weller, A. Z. Phys. Chem. 1982, 133, 93.
(33) Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. Handbook of Photochem-
istry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993.
(34) Titan software version 1 from Wavefunction, Inc., 18401 Von
Karman, Suite 370, Irvine, CA 92612.
(35) Watanabe, T.; Honda, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 2617.
(36) Steenken, S.; Jovanovich, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
617.