C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 1
an alkyne, must play a critically important role in the present (Z)-
selective dimerization.9,11,12 This is in sharp contrast with the
analogous reactions catalyzed by lanthanide metallocene or ben-
zamidate-ligated catalysts, in which the addition of an alkynide to
an alkyne took place in an “intramolecular” fashion at a monomeric
alkynide/alkyne intermediate and thus always yielded the (E)-enyne
products whenever the head-to-head reaction occurred.3
Scheme 2
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, X-ray
data for 9 and 11 (CIF), and spectral data for all new compounds (PDF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) (a) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259. (b) Nicolaou,
K. C.; Dai, W.-M.; Tsay, S.-C.; Estevez, V. A.; Wrasidlo, W. Science
1992, 256, 1172.
(2) For examples, see: (a) Rubina, M.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 11107. (b) Herrmann, W. A.; Bo¨hm, V. P. W.; Gsto¨ttmayr, C.
W. K.; Grosche, M.; Reisinger, C.-P.; Weskamp, T. J. Organomet. Chem.
2001, 617-618, 616. (c) Ohmura, T.; Yorozuya, S.; Yamamoto, Y.;
Miyaura, N. Organometallics 2000, 19, 365. (d) Nishibayashi, Y.;
Yamanashi, M.; Wakiji, I.; Hidai, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
2909. (e) Qu¨, J.-P.; Masui, D.; Ishii, Y.; Hidai, M. Chem. Lett. 1998,
1003. (f) Trost, B. M.; Sorum, M. T.; Chan, C.; Harms, A. E.; Ru¨hter, G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 698. (g) Yi, C. S.; Liu, N. Organometallics
1996, 15, 3968. (h) Bianchini, C.; Frediani, P.; Masi, D.; Peruzzini, M.;
Zanobini, F. Organometallics 1994, 13, 4616. (i) Jun, C.-H.; Lu, Z.;
Crabtree, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 7119.
(3) For examples, see: (a) Duchateau, R.; van Wee, C. T.; Teuben, J. H.
Organometallics 1996, 15, 2291. (b) Schaverien, C. J. Organometallics
1994, 13, 69. (c) Evans, W. J.; Keyer, R. A.; Ziller, J. W. Organometallics
1993, 12, 2618. (d) Heeres, H. J.; Nijhoff, J.; Teuben, J. H. Organome-
tallics 1993, 12, 2609. (e) Forsyth, C. M.; Nolan, S. P.; Stern, C. L.;
Marks, T. J. Organometallics 1993, 12, 3618. (f) Heeres, H. J.; Teuben,
J. H. Organometallics 1991, 10, 1980. (g) den Haan, K. H.; Wielstra, Y.;
Teuben, J. H. Organometallics 1987, 6, 2053. (h) Haskel, A.; Straub, T.;
Dash, A. K.; Eisen, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3014. (i) Dash,
A. K.; Gourevich, I.; Wang, J. Q.; Wang, J.; Kapon, M.; Eisen, M. S.
Organometallics 2001, 20, 5084.
(4) Z)-Selective head-to-head dimerization of aliphatic alkynes catalyzed by
ruthenium catalysts was recently reported.2e However, these catalysts were
not suitable for the dimerization of aromatic alkynes.
(5) Recent reviews: (a) Arndt, S.; Okuda, J. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1953.
(b) Hou, Z.; Wakatsuki, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 647, 61. (c) Hou,
Z.; Wakatsuki, Y. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 231, 1.
in THF-d8 afforded the head-to-head Z-dimer (2j) in 95% yield
(entry 10, Table 2).
All of these reactions were homogeneous at the reaction
temperatures (80-110 °C). When the reaction mixtures were cooled
to room temperature, however, the corresponding lutetium alkynide
species precipitated as crystalline powders. In the case of phenyl-
acetylene, single crystals of 11 were obtained, which adopted a
dimeric structure via the phenylacetylide bridges as shown by an
X-ray analysis.8,9 The activity and selectivity of 11 for the
dimerization of phenylacetylene were almost the same as those of
the alkyl complex 8 under similar conditions,10 which strongly
suggests that the true catalysts in the present systems are alkynide
species and more importantly the alkynide catalyst species can be
recovered and reused. A much higher recovery yield for the less
substituted (and thus less soluble) anilido complex 12 (93%) was
achieved than for 11 (65%) by evaporation of the reaction solvent
and hexane extraction of the residue. The recovered 11 or 12 was
identical to that freshly prepared by the reaction of 8 or 9 with
phenylacetylene, respectively, and could therefore be reused without
loss of activity and selectivity (Scheme 1).10
A possible reaction mechanism is shown in Scheme 2. Acid-
base reaction between an alkyl complex and a terminal alkyne
should easily give a dimeric alkynide species such as 11 or 12.
Coordination of an alkyne to a metal center of the dimeric alkynide
species could afford A or B by breaking one of the two alkynide
bridges.11 Attack of the terminal alkynide to the coordinated alkyne
in A (path a) should give C, which upon deprotonation reaction
with another molecule of alkyne would release the (Z)-enyne
product 2 and regenerate the alkynide catalyst species. On the other
hand, the addition of the terminal alkynide to the alkyne in B (path
b) would give D, which upon reaction with another molecule of
alkyne could yield the head-to-tail dimer 4 and regenerate the
alkynide species similarly.12 Apparently, a dimeric intermediate such
as A, which leads to “intermolecular” addition of an alkynide to
(6) (a) Hou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tezuka, H.; Xie, P.; Tardif, O.; Koizumi, T.;
Yamazaki, H.; Wakatsuki, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10533. (b)
Hou, Z.; Koizumi, T.; Nishiura, M.; Wakatsuki, Y. Organometallics 2001,
20, 3323. (c) Tardif, O.; Hou, Z.; Nishiura, M.; Koizumi, T.; Wakatsuki,
Y. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4565. (d) Hou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tardif, O.;
Wakatsuki, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9216. (e) Hou, Z.; Zhang,
Y.; Nishiura, M.; Wakatsuki, Y. Organometallics 2003, 22, 129.
(7) Complexes 5-9 (new compounds) were synthesized by the reactions of
Ln(CH2SiMe3)3(THF)2 with 1 equiv of Me2Si(C5Me4H)NHR′, according
to a procedure reported for the synthesis of 10. See: Arndt, S.; Voth, P.;
Spaniol, T. P.; Okuda, J. Organometallics 2000, 19, 4690.
(8) See the Supporting Information for details.
(9) The dimeric alkynide complexes 11 and 12 were very thermally stable,
which remained unchanged after being heated at 150 °C in toluene-d8
overnight in the absence of an alkyne. This is in striking contrast with
what was observed previously in the case of the analogous metallocene
or benzamidate-ligated lanthanide alkynide complexes, which rapidly
decomposed or coupled into trienediyl derivatives upon heating.3a,c-e
(10) A small amount of THF (2 equiv per 11 or 12) was required to achieve
the exclusive head-to-head (Z)-dimerization of phenylacetylene, because
11 or 12 is a THF-free complex, while 8 or 9 bears a THF ligand. This
result is in agreement with the THF effect observed above.
(11) The 13C NMR spectrum of the analogous yttrium (I ) 1/2) alkynide
complex [Me2Si(C5Me4)(NPh)Y{µ-CCC6H4(C5H11-n)-4}(THF)]2 in C6D6
(containing 1 equiv of THF per Y) showed a triplet at both 22 °C (δ
138.7, 1JYC ) 23 Hz) and 80 °C (δ 142.2, 1JYC ) 23 Hz) for the R-alkynide
carbon, suggesting that the µ-alkynide-bridged dimeric structure in this
type of complex is considerably strong. Addition of 2 equiv of 4-(n-
pentyl)phenylacetylene to this solution at 80 °C afforded quantitatively
the corresponding Z-dimerization product in 3 h, while the triplet for the
R-alkynide carbon remained almost unchanged after the reaction.
(12) Path a could be a sterically favored process, while path b might be
electronically preferred especially when R is an alkyl or electron-donating
group. In the presence of THF, A might be preferred to B because of
crowdedness caused by the THF molecules (ligands) around the metal
centers. Further studies are in progress to clarify the mechanism.
JA027595D
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 5, 2003 1185