A R T I C L E S
Nakata et al.
R-Man (10 mM), the apparent titration curve flattened (an
apparent association constant (log K ) 4.76)), whereas Me-â-
Glc did not show such an inhibition effect. The lessened affinity
can be reasonably attributed to the masking of the natural
binding pocket of ConA by Me-R-Man and not by Me-â-Glc.
It is clear that the hybridization of an artificial receptor to ConA
successfully allows us to modulate the saccharide selectivity
of a natural lectin by enhancing the affinity of the semisynthetic
receptor toward the specific saccharides.
On the other hand, cellobiose (Cel: D-Glc-â-1,4-D-Glc), a
â-linked disaccharide, is not fluorescently sensed, probably
because of the preference of the R-configuration over â found
in the native ConA pocket. In addition, regioisomers among
the disaccharides composed of two D-Glc units (R-configuration)
can be discriminated by APET-ConA, that is, isomaltose
(Isomal) with a 1,6-connection is selectively detected but not
maltose (Mal) with a 1,4-connection. In Isomal bearing a 1,6-
linkage, the second glucose unit can isomerize to a furanose
ring, 1,2-diol or 1,3-diol of which is favorable to binding by
PBA,14d,e whereas such a pyranose/furanose ring isomerization
cannot occur in Mal bearing 1,4-linkage. Additionally, it seems
that the more flexible motion of the second glucose unit through
the 1,6-connection is readily bound to the PBA site of APET-
ConA. Among the more complicated oligosaccharides, 1,3- and
1,6-Mannotriose (Man-tri), which is the strongest ligand for
native ConA and thus is detected by IAEDANS-ConA, is not
sensed by APET-ConA. This is presumably due to all the OH
groups of Man-tri interacting with the ConA surface as well as
the ConA pocket12 and being unavailable to interact with the
PBA unit. Consistent with this explanation, we found that Man-
tetra, which bears an additional mannose unit to Man-tri, can
be sensed by APET-ConA. Although PBA itself shows the poor
affinity toward Isomal and Man-tetra (log K is less than 2),
APET-ConA gains a moderate affinity to these saccharides. This
may be explained by the proximity effect of PBA to the native
binding pocket of ConA, that is, the PBA site close to the ConA
pocket effectively acts as a subsite for saccharide binding, so
as to cause the PET fluorescence sensing, even though the net
binding affinity is not remarkably enhanced.
Scope and Limitation. In conclusion, the rational coupling
of an artificial receptor with a native receptor protein could
evolve toward a novel semisynthetic receptor and sensor. As
the seminal work by Norrild previously pointed out, PBA
preferentially forms a tight complex with cis-1,2-furanose type
of diol involving the C1 hydroxyl of sugars,14d and the
hybridization of PBA to lectin has limited potential in the
practical application. However, it is important that the present
proof-of-principle experiment clearly demonstrates the coopera-
tive action between an artificial and a native receptor. By using
alternative approaches, host-guest chemistry has produced a
number of artificial receptors such as crown ether, cyclodextrin,
cyclophane, and others based on hydrogen-bonding force,
etc.,15,16 and biochemical studies have already unveiled various
natural receptor proteins for the last several decades.17 Therefore,
it is envisioned that the designed hybrid of these two families
will facilitate the generation of semisynthetic receptors with
Figure 4. Summary of the binding constants evaluated by fluorescence
change of various bio- or chemosensors in this study.
enhanced affinity and selectivity, not only toward a variety of
simple carbohydrates, but also for other biological substances
such as glycolipids, glycopeptides/proteins, and bioactive
hormones, etc.6-8
In cases where targets are structurally complicated and
diverse, such as saccharide derivatives, it is generally difficult
to determine the target structure by a typical one-to-one
recognition. Instead, the pattern recognition is advantageous to
such a case as Anslyn pointed out.1 However, to carry out the
pattern recognition, a set of receptors bearing various selectivity
is required. In the present case, for example, IAEDANS-ConA
cannot distinguish Man-tri from Man-tetra and APET-ConA can
scarcely distinguish Man-tetra from Maltitol. However, compar-
ing the sensing pattern of IAEDANS-ConA and APET-ConA
enables one to distinguish the three saccharides (see the sensing
pattern shown in Figure 4). Although this is still primitive, we
can expect a more precise pattern recognition when a rich variety
of fluorescent biosensors will be prepared according to our
approach. We are currently investigating along this line.
Experimental Section
General Methods. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-
of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) was recorded on PE
Voyager DE-RP, where sinapinic acid (SA) was used as a matrix. UV-
visible spectra were obtained on a Hitachi U-3000 spectrometer.
Fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Hitachi F-4500 spectrometer.
ConA was purchased from Funakoshi and used without further
purification. IAEDANS was purchased from Molecular Probes. The
other chemical reagents were purchased from Aldrich or Tokyo
Chemical Industry.
Photoaffinity Label of ConA with P-PALM Reagent. This process
was conducted according to our previous method.11c The second fraction
was collected and mainly used in the following study.18
Preparation of APET-ConA. To a solution of the labeled ConA
(a heterodimer consisted of the labeled monomoer and the unlabeled
(native) monomer, that is, the second fraction in the affinity column)
(20 µM, 10 mL) in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) was added Tris-
carboxyethylphosphine (TCEP) (a final concentration of TCEP is 100
(18) Since the fluorescence signal from APET-ConA is produced by a saccharide-
binding event at the PBA site, not at the native ConA pocket (Figure 1a),
the binding constants are evaluated on the basis of the saccharide binding
at the PBA-modified ConA site. Although the other unmodified binding
site (i.e., without PBA) may bind saccharides with a weak affinity, it does
not affect the determination of binding constants under conditions of the
excess amount of saccharide (for Benesi-Hildebrandt analysis). In case
of the strong binding affinity observed at the almost stoichiometric amount
of the saccharide, the affinity may be slightly underestimated because the
native binding pocket binds the corresponding saccharide without fluores-
cence sensing so as to decrease the free concentration of the saccharide.
(15) Lehn, J. M. Chem.-Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455.
(16) Rowan, S. J.; Cantrill, S. J.; Cousins, G. R. L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Stoddart,
J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898.
(17) Subrahmanyam, S.; Piletsky, S. A.; Turner, A. P. F. Anal. Chem. 2002,
74, 3942.
9
494 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 2, 2004