Scheme 4
rearranged products 5 and 6. Alternatively the nucleophile
could be the less effective alkylated-carbonate-oxygen, or
carbamate nitrogen, and decarboxylation is concurrent with, or
occurs after, the ring closure (Scheme 4). Cyclisation of alkyl
carbamates to form nitrogen heterocycles can be initiated by
selenium reagents, but in these cases nitrogen-decarboxylation
does not occur in situ.4,10–12
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, PhCOCl, pyridine, 88%; ii, NaH,
DMF; Me2NCOCl or MeOCOCl, (3) 91%; (4) 78%; iii, n-BuLi, DABCO,
THF; cyclohexanone; then PhCOCl or Me2NCOCl, (5) 5%; (6) 4%; iv,
SiO2, CHCl3, D, see Table 1.
by reaction of the primary sulfide 6 (Table 1, entry 12). Only
elimination was observed for carbonate 4.
Alumina also catalyses the reaction of the carbonyl deriva-
tives on heating, but does not do so at ambient temperature.
Other solids (TiO2, MgSO4) do not catalyse the transformation.
The choice of solvent is also important: the reaction does not
occur in solvents that reduce the activity of silica gel such as
methanol and THF, but does so in less Lewis basic solvents
(PhMe and EtOAc). Addition of water inhibits the reactions,
whereas drying the silica gel at elevated temperature in vacuo
increases the activity of the catalyst. The residual ethanol
present in commercial chloroform also inhibits the reaction. The
reactions were performed in chloroform that had been purified
by passage through a column of silica gel.
A range of cyclisation reactions in which the episulfonium
ion could be captured by an intramolecular nucleophile was
then attempted. Activation of the leaving group while temporar-
ily protecting the nucleophile could be achieved with a cyclic
carbamate or carbonate (Scheme 3). The generation of the
episulfonium ion would then be followed by a ring closure with
loss of carbon dioxide. Treatment of the cyclic carbamate 8 with
silica gel in refluxing chloroform produced the pyrrolidine 9 in
excellent yield. Filtration, washing of the silica gel and removal
of solvent produces essentially pure cyclic amine. In identical
conditions the cyclic carbonate reacted quantitatively to give a
roughly equal mixture of THF 11 and allylic sulfide 12 in
chloroform, but more cyclisation occurred in CCl4. As it is
known that the equivalent free hydroxyl group readily cyclises
to give a quantitative yield of THF,1 the silica gel reactions
indicate that the carbonate group must have an appreciable life-
time after episulfonium ion generation. For both the ether and
amine cyclisations, slow decarboxylation may occur before the
cyclisation, but this seems unlikely given the isolations of the
Scheme 5 Reagents and conditions: i, LDA, THF, 278 °C then BrCH2CN,
HMPA, 43%; ii, LiAlH4, Et2O, 99%; iii, CDI, DMF, 65%; iv, SiO2, CHCl3,
D.
The seven-membered carbamate 14 was synthesised from
ketone1 13 (Scheme 5). Treatment of this cyclic compound with
silica gel in refluxing chloroform produced a mixture of
unrearranged pyrrolidine 15 and rearranged piperidine 16
(Scheme 5). The nitrogen nucleophile attacks the proximal end
of the episulfonium ion more readily to form a five-membered
ring, than the distal end to produce a six-membered ring. In the
equivalent strong-acid-catalysed ether-cyclisation reaction, the
six-membered-ring compound is the only product, and the
reaction is under thermodynamic control. In this silica gel
catalysed process however it seems that the loss of CO2
prevents the regeneration of an episulfonium ion and that the
product ratio is controlled by the relative rates of cyclisation
rather than the ultimate stability of the products. Similar product
ratios have been observed in other non-equilibrating cyclisation
reactions.1,9
We thank the EPSRC for a grant to L. C.
Notes and references
1 D. J. Fox, D. House and S. Warren, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41,
2462.
2 J. M. Barks, G. G. Weingarten and D. W. Knight, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 2000, 3496.
3 T. Wirth, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3740.
4 R. Deziel and E. Malenfant, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 4660.
5 A. D. Jones, D. W. Knight and D. E. Hibbs, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 2001, 1182.
6 Y. Tamaru, S. Kawamura, T. Bando, K. Tanaka, M. Hojo and Z.
Yoshida, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 5491.
7 W. S. Lee, K. C. Jang, J. H. Kim and K. H. Park, Chem. Commun., 1999,
251.
8 T. Ohsawa, M. Ihara, K. Fukumoto and T. Kametani, J. Org. Chem.,
1983, 48, 3644.
9 D. Brugier, F. Outurquin and C. Paulmier, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 2001, 37.
10 M. Caplow, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90, 6795.
11 D. L. J. Clive, C. K. Wong, W. A. Kiel and S. M. Menchen, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1978, 379.
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, CDI, CH3CN; ii, SiO2, CHCl3, D; iii,
SiO2, CHCl3 (11+12 = 50+50) or CCl4 (11+12 = 86+14), D.
12 K. C. Nicolaou, D. A. Claremon, W. E. Barnette and S. P. Seitz, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 3704.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 2528–2529
2529