Tetraosmium Carbonyl Clusters
Organometallics, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2003 1031
H, 1.2, N, 1.1. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CO) 2095(w), 2064(s), 2047(s),
2032(m), 1997(w). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ -16.79 (s, 1H, hy-
dride), -13.35 (s, 1H, hydride), -0.03 (s, br, 1H, NH2), 0.32
(s, br, 1H, NH2), 2.60 (s, 1H, methyl), 6.73 (dd, J HH ) 7.8, 2H,
phenyl), 7.24 (m, 6H, phenyl), 7.43 (m, 2H, phenyl). FAB-MS
(m/z): 1266. 4 Anal. Calcd for C25H15NO11Os4: C, 23.71; H,
1.19; N 1.11. Found: C, 23.7; H, 1.2, N, 1.2. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CO)
2103(w), 2074(s), 2055(s), 2029(s), 2008(w). 1H NMR (CD2-
Cl2): δ -19.10 (s, 1H, hydride), -15.90 (s, 1H, hydride), 4.00
(s, br, 1H, NH2), 4.83 (s, br, 1H, NH2), 2.12 (s, 1H, methyl),
6.81 (d, J HH ) 6.9, 2H, phenyl), 7.02 (m, 6H, phenyl), 7.31 (t,
J HH ) 7.9, 2H, phenyl). FAB-MS (m/z): 1087. [M - Ph(CHd
C)Ph]+.
P r ep a r a tion of [Os4(µ-H)4(CO)10(µ-NH2)(NCMe)2][BF 4]
(5). Solid 2 (23 mg, 0.02 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile
(30 mL) to give a yellow solution. One equivalent of trimethy-
lamine-N-oxide was added dropwise into the yellow solution.
Upon stirring for 3 h, the yellow solution darkened. The solvent
was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was redis-
solved in dichloromethane and separated by TLC eluting with
n-hexane/dichloromethane (1:3, v/v) affording [Os4(µ-H)4(CO)10-
using a Bruker SMART CCD 1000 diffractometer with graphite-
monochromated Mo KR radiation using ω scan type. Details
of the intensity data collection and crystal data are given in
Table 1. The data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization
effects. The structures were solved by direct methods (SIR92
or SHELXS86)16 and expanded using Fourier techniques
(DIRDIF94),17 refined by full-matrix least-squares analysis.
Refinements for all non-hydrogen atoms anisotropically have
been attempted for all the structures. However, some thermal
parameters of these atoms were found to be nonpositive
definite, and their thermal parameters were refined in an
isotropical manner. This is a common problem encountered
for strongly absorbing crystals, as the absorption correction
is imperfect. Hydrogen atoms on the organic moieties were
introduced in their idealized position, while hydride atoms
were located either by difference Fourier syntheses using low
angle data or from potential energy calculations.18 They were
included in the structure factors but not refined. The absolute
structures of 8 and 9 were also established from the refined
Flack parameters. All calculations were performed using the
teXsan19 crystallographic software package of the Molecular
Structure Corporation.
(µ-NH2)(NCMe)2][BF4] (5) (15 mg, 66%). Anal. Calcd for C14H12
-
BF4N3O10Os4: C, 13.67; H, 0.98; N, 3.42. Found: C, 13.8; H,
1.0, N, 3.5. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CN) 2107(m); ν(CO) 2072(s), 2059-
(s), 2022(m), 2001(w), 1989(w). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ -21.98
(s, 2H, hydride), -15.53 (s, 2H, hydride), 0.64 (s, 2H, NH2),
2.69 (s, 6H, methyl). FAB-MS (m/z): 1143.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Syn th esis. The preparation of 1-9 is summarized
in Scheme 2. The parent amino cluster 1 was simply
prepared by the reaction of [Os4(µ-H)4(CO)12] with o-tert-
butylhydroxylamine hydrochloride (tBuONH2‚HCl). An
amino transfer to the cluster can be achieved upon
elimination of the tBuO group as tBuOH in acidic
medium. This would result in the further coordination
of NH2 ligand to the metal core. The novel cationic
amido cluster 2 was isolated by using this strategy. The
amido-supported butterfly geometry of 2 is thought to
be favorable for the formation of a nitrene cluster after
removing the labile acetonitrile ligand. The carbonyla-
tion of 2 in the refluxing chloroform afforded the neutral
clusters 6 and 7. The formation of trinuclear cluster 7
is attributed to the decomposition of 2. Cluster 7, the
deprotonated analogue of 2, was protonated with trif-
luoromethylsulfonic acid (CF3SO3H) to give the cationic
8. Clusters 2 and 8 are isoelectronic, and the protonation
and deprotonation processes are found to be reversible.
The first example of a (µ3-NH) nitrene osmium cluster
9 was isolated by the thermolysis of 7 in toluene. The
transformation of an amino ligand to a nitrene ligand
through an amido ligand was established. In addition,
the reaction of 2 with excess Me3NO in acetonitrile gave
another cationic cluster, 5.
Ca r bon yla tion of 2. A solution of 2 (23 mg, 0.02 mmol) in
chloroform (30 mL) was heated to refluxing temperature with
carbon monoxide bubbled through the solution for 10 h. With
the aid of IR monitoring, the reaction was halted until all of 2
was consumed. The solvent was then removed in vacuo, and
the residue was chromatographed on TLC using n-hexane/
dichloromethane (1:1, v/v) as eluent. A minor yellow band of
[Os3(µ-H)2(CO)9(µ-NH2)Cl] (6) (2 mg, 10%) and a pale yellow
band of [Os4(µ-H)3(CO)12(µ-NH2)] (7) (12 mg, 55%) were
isolated. 6: Anal. Calcd for C10H4ClNO9Os3: C, 13.52; H, 0.45;
N, 1.58. Found: C, 13.4; H, 0.44, N, 1.59. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CO)
2124(w), 2116(w), 2091(m), 2063(s), 2049(m), 2005(m). 1H
NMR (CD2Cl2): δ -15.37 (t, J HH ) 2.0, 2H, hydride), 5.30 (s,
br, 2H, NH2). FAB-MS (m/z): 876. 7: Anal. Calcd for C12H5-
NO12Os4: C, 12.91; H, 0.45; N, 1.25. Found: C, 12.8; H, 0.46,
N, 1.25. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CO) 2107(w), 2078(s), 2060(s), 2014-
(s), 1989(m). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2): δ -16.38 (s, 3H, hydride),
-0.57 (s, br, 2H, NH2). FAB-MS (m/z): 1116.
R ea ct ion of
7 w it h Tr iflu or om et h ylsu lfon ic Acid
(CF 3SO3H). To a yellow dichloromethane solution of 7 (22 mg,
0.02 mmol) were added several drops of trifluoromethylsulfonic
acid (CF3SO3H). The yellow solution was stirred at ambient
temperature for 3 h, and then the solvent was reduced in
vacuo. Some colorless precipitate appeared and was character-
ized as [Os4(µ-H)4(CO)12(µ-NH2)][CF3SO3] (8) (8 mg, 36%). Anal.
Calcd for
Found: C, 12.4; H, 0.46, N, 1.09. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CO) 2126(s),
2105(s), 2084(vs), 2049(s), 2018(w). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2):
C13H6F3NO15Os4S: C, 12.33; H, 0.48; N, 1.11.
The main stimulus for the study of 1 toward diphe-
nylacetylene stems from the success of the isolation of
a series of µ4-nitrene clusters in the reaction of [Ru3-
(CO)10(µ3-NOMe)] with diphenylacetylene.20 The diphe-
nylacetylene is suggested to be important structural
stabilizers in the formation of a square planar metal
core that contains a µ4-NH ligand. However, only two
δ
-17.20 (s, 4H, hydride), 2.63 (s, br, 2H, NH2). FAB-MS (m/z):
1117.
Th er m olysis of [Os4(µ-H)3(CO)12(µ-NH2)]. A solution of
7 (22 mg, 0.02 mmol) in toluene (30 mL) was refluxed under
an argon atmosphere for 24 h. After cooling, the solvent was
removed in vacuo and the residue was separated by prepara-
tive TLC on silica, with an eluent of n-hexane/dichloromethane
(1:1, v/v). The pale yellow band was isolated and identified as
[Os4(µ-H)2(CO)12(µ3-NH)] (9) (5 mg, 24%). Anal. Calcd for C12H3-
NO12Os4: C, 12.94; H, 0.27; N, 1.26. Found: C, 12.9; H, 0.26;
N, 1.27. IR (CH2Cl2): ν(CO) 2078(s), 2030(s), 2006(m). 1H NMR
(CD2Cl2): δ -16.82 (d, J HH ) 0.8, 2H, hydride), 9.35 (s, br,
1H, NH). FAB-MS (m/z): 1115.
(16) Altomare, A.; Burla, M. C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, M.;
Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi A.; Polidori, G. SIR92, J . Appl. Crystallogr.
1994, 27, 435.
(17) SHELXS 86, Program for Crystal Structure Solution: Sheld-
rick, G. M. Acta Crystallgr., Sect. A 1990, 46, 467.
(18) Orpen, A. G. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1980, 2509.
(19) DIRDIF94: Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.;
Bosman, W. P.; Gelder, R. de.; Israel, R.; Smits, J . M. M. The DIRDIF-
94 program system; Technical Report of the Crystllography Laboratory;
University of Nijmegen: The Netherlands, 1994.
X-r a y Cr ysta llogr a p h y. Single crystals of 2-9 were grown
from their appropriate solvent systems under favorable condi-
tions. Intensity data were collected at ambient temperature
(20) Ho, E. N. M.; Wong, W. T. J . Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998,
4215.