10.1002/chem.201700868
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
elimination by Si–C bond formation and elimination of the β-(E)
vinylsilane. Since some occurrences, such as the formation of
alkynyl silanes (Scheme 4), cannot be explained by this
mechanism, the so-called modified Chalk-Harrod (m.C.H.)
mechanism was proposed later. In the m.C.H. mechanism, the
alkyne inserts into the M–Si bond to furnish a metal alkenyl
intermediate. The geminal α product or β-(Z) vinylsilane are
considered to form after isomerisation of the metal alkenyl
intermediate.
Overall, the observed effects in redox-induced catalysis[23] can
be explained as follows: the oxidation of the iron atom in the
metalloligand causes an additional positive charge on the
rhodium atom. Being in the formal oxidation state +3 before the
reductive elimination step, the additional charge lowers the
activation barrier to re-generate the +1 oxidation state of Rh.
This cooperative “oxidatively induced reductive elimination” step
obviously provides the key to a different catalytic cycle and thus
to both a higher catalytic activity and, in most cases, a markedly
different selectivity.
Experimental Section
Experimental Details: See the Supporting Information.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from the DFG-funded trans-
regional collaborative research centre SFB/TRR 88 “Cooperative
effects in homo- and heterometallic complexes (3MET)”
(projects B1 and B4). We thank Wolfram Feuerstein for
calculating the g tensor of 2+.
Scheme 4. Chalk-Harrod (A) and modified Chalk-Harrod (B) mechanism for
the hydrosilylation of alkynes.
In contrast to platinum, rhodium-catalysed hydrosilylation
reactions occur preferentially along the m.C.H. mechanism and
therefore exhibits different selectivities. In a seminal paper,
Sakaki and co-workers investigated the elementary steps of both
mechanistic variants in the rhodium-catalysed hydrosilylation of
ethylene by quantum chemical calculations.[22] It was concluded
that the rate-determining step in the C.H. mechanism is the Si–C
reductive elimination (114.6 kJ mol-1 at DFT level). The ethylene
insertion into the Rh–H bond in the classical C.H. mechanism is
basically barrier-free (<1 kJ mol-1). Contrary to this, the rate-
determining step of the m.C.H. mechanism is either ethylene
insertion into the Rh–Si bond (56.5 kJ mol-1) or the oxidative
addition of the silane (65.7 kJ mol-1), depending on the level of
theory. Overall, the m.C.H. mechanism is therefore more
favourable in Rh-catalysed hydrosilylations.
Keywords: Redox-switchable catalysis, [1]ferrocenophane,
cooperative effects, bimetallic complexes, metalloligand
References
1
(a) A. M. Allgeier, C. A. Mirkin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 894; (b)
V. Lyaskovskyy, B. de Bruin, ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 270; (c) O. R. Luca, C.
H. Crabtree, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1440; (d) V. Blanco, D. A. Leigh,
V. Marcos, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 5341; (e) V. K. K. Praneeth, M. R.
Ringenberg, T. R. Ward, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10228.
I. M. Lorkovic, R. R. Duff, M. S. Wrighton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
3617.
2
3
Reviews: (a) S. M. Guillaume, E. Kirillov, Y. Sarazin, J.-F. Carpentier,
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 7988; (b) A. J. Teator, D. N. Lastovickova, C. W.
Bielawski, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1969.
4
5
Selected examples: (a) C. K. A. Gregson, V. C. Gibson, N. J. Long, E. L.
Marshall, P. J. Oxford, A. J. P. White, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
7410; (b) X. Wang, A. Thevenon, J. L. Brosmer, I. Yu, S. I. Khan, P.
Mehrkhodavandi, P. L. Diaconescu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11264.
(a) L. Hettmanczyk, S. Manck, C. Hoyer, S. Hohloch, B. Sarkar, Chem.
Commun. 2015, 51, 10949; (b) S. Ibanez, M. Poyatos, L. N. Dawe, D.
́
̃
Gusev, E. Peris, Organometallics 2016, 35, 2747; (c) L. Hettmanczyk, L.
Suntrup, S. Klenk, C. Hoyer, B. Sarkar, Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 576; for
closely related work, see (d) P. Neumann, H. Dib, A.-M. Caminade, E.
Hey-Hawkins, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 311; (e) K. Arumugam,
C. D. Varnado, Jr., S. Sproules, V. M. Lynch, C.W. Bielawski, Chem.
Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10866; (f) M. Süßner, H. Plenio, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 6885.
Scheme 5. DFT-calculated (BP86/def-SV(P) and {B3LYP/def2-TZVPP})
reductive elimination using 2 or 2+ as catalyst (Section S5 of the Supporting
Information).
We speculated that in our case the introduction of an additional
positive charge on the metalloligand lowers the activation barrier
of the Si–C reductive elimination to such an extend that the
classical C.H. mechanism becomes favourable for the rhodium
catalyst 2+. Indeed, DFT calculations (BP86/def-SV(P) and
{B3LYP/def2-TZVPP}) provided clear evidence: the activation
barrier for the reductive elimination step was found to be
considerable smaller (64.4 kJ {66.7} mol-1) for 2+ as compared to
2 (105.5 {82.1} kJ mol-1, Scheme 5; see also Table S5-1). Our
calculations also predict that going form the starting to the
transition state both the positive charge and the spin density in
2+ is significantly shifted to the rhodium atom (q(Rh)Start = 0.13,
q(Rh)TS = 0.46; sd(Rh)Start = 0.00, sd(Rh)TS = 0.84; all for
B3LYP/def2-TZVPP).
6
(a) S. González-Gallardo, I. Kuzu, P. Ona-Burgos, T. Wolfer, C. Wang, K.
W. Klinkhammer, W. Klopper, S. Bräse, F. Breher, Organometallics 2014,
33, 941; (b) S. Styra, S. González-Gallardo, F. Armbruster, P. Ona-
Burgos, E. Moos, M. Vonderach, P. Weis, O. Hampe, A. Gren, Y.
Schmitt, M. Gerhards, F. Menges, M. Gaffga, G. Niedner-Schatteburg,
F. Breher, Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 8436.
7
8
F. Walz, E. Moos, D. Garnier, R. Köppe, C. E. Anson, F. Breher, Chem.
Eur. J. 2017, 23, 1173.
Recent reviews on strained sandwich compounds: (a) D. E. Herbert, U. F.
J. Mayer, I. Manners, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5060; (b) M.
Tamm, Chem. Commun. 2008, 3089; (c) H. Braunschweig, T. Kupfer,
Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 455; (d) H. Bhattacharjee, J. Müller, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2016, 314, 114. Selected examples on [1]phosphaferroceno-
phanes: (e) E.
K.
Sarbisheh, J.
C.
Green and J. Müller,
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.