Chemistry Letters Vol.32, No.1 (2003)
107
nanopore of 1 forms a large macrocyclic ring constructed from
five Cu(I) ions and five TACH molecules, as shown in Figure 2,
whose large ring is not flat but wounded. The whole structure, as
shown in Figure 1, has a streamlined shape. As described above,
the used components, Cu(I) and TACH, were a building unit that
leads to the formation of the compound with a three-fold axial
symmetry. However, the nanopore revealed by the crystal
structure analysis shows a distorted pseudofive-fold axial
symmetry, which is quite unique. Because the crystallography
teaches that the five-fold axis of rotation and five-fold axis of
rotatory inversion are not present theoretically. Figure 3, which
shows the view from the apex of the cubic cell, will give the
solution for the question that the large macrocyclic ring with the
distorted pseudofive-fold axial symmetry is prepared from the
building units with a three-fold axial symmetry. The careful
observation of this crystal structure exhibited that the center of
TACH and Cu(I) ion lie on the same three-fold axis and both
contribute to the formation of the large macrocycles. The three
bonds expanded from the Cu(I) atom toward the planar triangular
directions are connected to the three amino groups of the
downward TACH molecule to form three macrocyclic rings,
which are also used for the formation of another three rings
expanded horizontally. The structure viewed from the three-fold
axis is a propeller-like one having six wings of macrocycles for
the horizontal and vertical directions.
We succeeded in the preparation of an infinite right-handed
single helical channel with a large nanopore. The macrocycle as a
minimum unit of channel has a distorted pseudofive-fold axial
symmetry, in which the large robust pore has been supported by
other TACH molecules. These findings suggest that the use of
lower symmetric building units leads to the formation of robust
channel, one of most important factors in appearance of the
functions.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (No. 11228203) from the Ministry of Education,
Science, Sports and Culture and supported in part by a grant
from the NITECH 21st Century COE Program, to which our
thanks are due.
References and Notes
1
2
3
O. M. Yaghi, H. Li, C. Davis, D. Richardson, and T. L. Groy,
Acc. Chem. Res., 31, 474 (1998).
M. Eddaoudi, D. B. Moler, H. Li, B. Chen, T. M. Reineke, M.
O’Keeffe, and M. Yaghi, Acc. Chem. Res., 34, 319 (2001).
S. Noro, R. Kitaura, M. Kondo, S. Kitagawa, T. Ishii, H.
Matsuzaka, and M. Yamashita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 2568
(2002).
4
5
H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, M. O’Keeffe, and O. M. Yaghi, Nature,
402, 276 (1999).
M. Kondo, T. Okubo, A. Asami, S. Noro, T. Yoshitomi, S.
Kitagawa, T. Ishii, H. Matsuzaka, and K. Seki, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 38, 140 (1999).
6
7
S. S.-Y. Chui, S. M.-F. Lo, J. P. H. Charmant, A. G. Orpen, and
I. D. Williams, Science, 283, 1148(1999).
J. S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon, and K.
Kim, Nature, 404, 982 (2000).
8M. Yoshizawa, Y. Takeyama, T. Kusukawa, and M. Fujita,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 41, 1347 (2002).
J. E. Bollinger, J. T. Mague, W. A. Banks, A. J. Kastin, and D.
M. Roundhill, Inorg. Chem., 34, 2143 (1995).
10 G. J. Kubas, Inorg. Synth., 19, 90 (1979).
9
Figure 2. ORTEP view of the macrocyclic ring unit of 1 with a
distorted pseudofive-fold axial symmetry, showing 30% prob-
ability thermal ellipsoids. The counter anions and hydrogen
atoms except for amino groups are omitted for clarity.
11 Crystallographic data for 1 (C6H12N3F6CuSb): cubic, space
ꢀ 3
ꢀ
group P213, a ¼ 10:8900ð8Þ A, V ¼ 1291:5ð2Þ A , Z ¼ 4,
Dcalcd ¼ 2:194 g cmÀ3, ꢀ ¼ 37:54 cmÀ1, 2ꢁmax ¼ 55ꢂ, Mo
ꢀ
Kꢂ radiation (ꢃ ¼ 0:71070 A), T ¼ 173 K, R1 ¼ 0:028,
Rw ¼ 0:094, and GOF = 1.54 for 556 independent reflections
with I > 2:0ꢄðIÞ and 53 variables.
12 G. Schwarzenbach, H.-B. Burgi, W. P. Jensen, G. A.
¨
Lawrance, L. Mꢁnsted, and A. M. Sargeson, Inorg. Chem.,
22, 4029 (1983).
13 X. S. Tan, Y. Fujii, T. Sato, Y. Nakano, and M. Yashiro,
Chem. Commun., 1999, 881.
14 B. M. T. Lam, J. A. Halfen, B. G. Young, Jr., J. R. Hagadorn,
´
´
P. L. Holland, A. Lledos, L. Cucurull-Sanchez, J. J. Novoa, S.
Alvarez, and W. B. Tolman, Inorg. Chem., 39, 4059 (2000).
15 The hole size was estimated from the distance between the
mean planes defined by the most deviated atoms in the
channel structure.
16 R. MacGillivray, S. Subramanian, and M. J. Zaworotko,
Chem. Commun., 1994, 1325.
17 O. M. Yaghi and H. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 10401 (1995).
Figure 3. ORTEP view looking down from the apex of the cubic
cell in 1, showing 30% probability thermal ellipsoids. The counter
anions and hydrogen atoms except for amino groups are omitted
for clarity.