C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Reduction of R-Fluoroketones by LiBH4 in Et2O in the
a
Presence of TiCl4
entry
substrate
LA
syn:anti
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
R-fluorotetralone
none
TiCl4
none
TiCl4
none
TiCl4
none
TiCl4
none
TiCl4
8:1
27:1
3:1
32:1
1:1
5:1
1:1
6:1
2:1
q
q
R-fluorotetralone
R-fluoroindanone
R-fluoroindanone
3-fluoro-2-butanone
3-fluoro-2-butanone
3-fluoro-2-octanone
3-fluoro-2-octanone
4-fluoro-5-nonanone
4-fluoro-5-nonanone
98
87
91
85
93
88
96
89
10
5:1
a Experimental conditions: 1 equiv of substrate is treated with 1.25-
2.5 equiv of LA at -78 °C, followed by addition of 2 equiv of LiBH4.
Reaction times were 5-7 h.
(Table 2). In each case, pretreatment with TiCl4 substantially
increased the diastereoselectivity of the reduction, providing a
selectivity consistent with chelation. Detailed mechanistic studies
on the use of other Lewis acids and the role of solvent on the
diastereoselectivity of reductions and bond-forming reactions are
currently being examined. The results of these studies will be
reported in due course.
Figure 1. All spectra are recorded at -78 °C in CD2Cl2.1H, 13C, and 19F
NMR spectra of 2-fluoropropiophenone are shown in A, D, and G,
respectively. Spectra B, E, H and C, F, I are the 1H, 13C, and 19F NMR
spectra of 2-fluoropropiophenone-TiCl4 complex and 2-fluoropropio-
phenone-Ti(OiPr)4 complex, respectively. In all 1H NMR spectra, the peak
at δ 5.32 is due to trace amounts of CHDCl2 in CD2Cl2, whereas the
additional peaks at δ 1.41 and 4.67 in spectrum C are due to isopropoxide.
In all 13C NMR spectra, the peak at δ 54.0 is due to CD2Cl2, and the peaks
at δ 76.59 and 26.71 in spectrum F are due to isopropoxide. The peak at δ
25.54 in F is due to 2-propanol impurity.
Acknowledgment. R.A.F. is grateful to the National Science
Foundation (CHE-0413845) and Lehigh University for support of
this work. We thank the reviewers for their insightful comments
on the manuscript.
1
CHF) are observed when H NMR is recorded in the presence of
TiCl4 under similar conditions (Figure 1B).
Supporting Information Available: General experimental condi-
tions, synthetic procedures, and spectral data (PDF). This material is
In the presence of TiCl4, the 13C spectrum shows that the carbonyl
carbon, CH3CFH- and CH3 appear at δ 205.8 (bs), δ 98.36 (d),
and δ 20.12 (d) (Figure 1E), whereas the respective 13C signals of
R-fluoropropiophenone in the absence of Lewis acid appear at δ
196.17 (d), δ 90.93 (d), and δ18.11 (d) (Figure 1D). Addition of
TiCl4 also results in a downfield shift of the aromatic 13C signals
[δ 129.0, 130.7, 132.23, 140.33] with respect to original aromatic
13C signals [δ 129.0, 129.12, 134.07, 134.47]. In addition, 19F NMR
spectra of R-fluoropropiophenone in the presence and absence of
TiCl4 display the 19F signal at δ -174.82 (m) and δ -187.0 (m),
respectively. Interaction of Ti with the fluorine and the carbonyl,
as shown by the concomitant shift of the 19F signal and 13C, provides
compelling evidence for the formation of TiCl4-R-fluoropropio-
References
(1) (a) Welch, J. T.; Eswarakrishnan, S. Fluorine in Bioorganic Chemistry;
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991. (b) Banks, R. E.; Smart, B. E.;
Tatlow, J. C. Organofluorine Chemistry: Principles and Commercial
Applications; Plenum Press: New York, 1994. (c) Ojima, I.; McCarthy,
J. R.; Welch, J. T. Biomedical Frontiers of Fluorine Chemistry; ACS
Symposium Series 639; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC,
1996.
(2) Myers, A. G.; Barbay, J. K.; Zhong, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
7207-7219.
(3) (a) Reetz, M. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 556-569. (b)
Våbenø, J.; Brisander, M.; Lejon, T.; Luthman, K. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 9186-9191.
(4) (a) Islas-Gonza´lez, G.; Puigjaner, C.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Riera,
A.; Perica`s, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6337-6341 and all
references therein. (b) Wo¨lker, D.; Haufe, G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
3015-3021.
(5) Chelation involving Lewis acids and trifluoromethyl or aromatic fluoro
groups has been proposed in a number of reductions and bond-forming
reactions: (a) Hanamoto, T.; Fuchikami, T. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
4969-4971. (b) Ooi, T.; Kagoshima, N.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 5754-5755. (c) Ooi, T.; Kagoshima, N.; Uraguchi, D.;
Maruoka, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7105-7108. (d) Ding, H.;
Friestad, G. K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 637-640. (e) Itoh, Y.; Yamanaka, M.;
Mikami, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13174-13175. (f) Itoh, Y.;
Mikami, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 649-651.
1
phenone chelate. Furthermore, the H and 13C ∆δ values for the
CH2 of propiophenone in the presence and absence of TiCl4 (where
chelation is not possible) were 0.46 and 0.93 ppm, respectively,
1
whereas the corresponding H and 13C ∆δ values for the -CHF
R-fluoropropiophenone were 0.86 and 7.43 ppm, further supporting
the intermediacy of a chelated intermediate.
1
In further studies, H and 13C NMR spectra of R-fluoropropio-
phenone obtained in the presence of Ti(OiPr)4 (Figure 1C,F) do
not show significant downfield shifts of aliphatic proton and carbon
signals (Figure 1A,D). While the Ti(OiPr)4 is bulkier than TiCl4,
the Lewis acidity of alkoxytitanium reagents decreases drastically
as chlorides are replaced by alkoxides in the series from TiCl4 to
Ti(OiPr)4, suggesting that the latter might be incapable of chela-
tion.13
(6) Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 78th ed.; CRC
Press: New York, 1997-1998; p 54.
(7) Bouwkamp, M. W.; de Wolf, J.; Morales, I. D.; Gercama, J.; Meetsma,
A.; Troyanov, S. I.; Hessen, B.; Teuben, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 12956-12957.
(8) The higher syn selectivity in Et2O is consistent with previous studies on
Ti-based reagents utilizing electron-donor solvents: Reetz, M. T.; Wes-
termann, J. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 647-654.
Taken together, these experiments show the following. (1) The
identity of the counterion on the reductant and the Ti-based Lewis
acid alters the diastereoselectivity of reduction of R-fluoro-
propiophenone. (2) NMR data are consistent with chelation between
TiCl4 and R-fluoropropiophenone. For this approach to be useful,
it should be applicable to a range of R-fluoroketones. To initially
examine the generality of this protocol, a series of R-fluoroketones
were reduced using LiBH4 in the presence and absence of TiCl4
(9) Cram, D. J.; Kopecky, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 2748-2755.
(10) Ahn, N. T. Top. Curr. Chem. 1980, 88, 145-162.
(11) Wong, S. S.; Paddon-Row, M. N. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991,
327-330.
(12) Keck, G. E.; Castellino, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3847-3849.
(13) Reetz, M. T. Top. Curr. Chem. 1982, 106, 1-54.
JA052546X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 34, 2005 11897