of 17 at -78 °C with 1.1 equiv each of LiHMDS/TBSCl,
using a solvent combination expected to favor (Z)-enolate
formation (THF/HMPA). No effort was made to isolate the
presumed intermediate 18, which was cleanly transformed
to the (Z)-bromoalkene 19 upon warming to room temper-
ature (75-85%).10 Finally, 19 afforded 45-50% yields of
the alkyne acid 20 upon treatment with NaH in DMF (not
optimized).
Scheme 3
We also tested the compatibility of the achiral Ireland-
Claisen rearrangement with sensitive functionality (Scheme
2). Allylic esters 23a-c were prepared by acylation of the
Scheme 2
Most likely, the nonreactive nature of 29, 31, and 32 stems
from a combination of factors. In the case of 29 an important
issue is competitive ester enolization, but with 31 and 32,
the principal effects are probably steric. Reagent 15 derives
much of its selectivity from its size and structural rigidity,7
both of which contribute to steric crowding. These interac-
tions are accentuated during 3,3-sigmatropic rearrangement
due to the formation of a quaternary center. Finally, the large
bromine atom imparts additional strain into what is already
a high-energy transition state, thereby inhibiting reaction.
This rationale is supported by experiments carried out with
the desbromo substrates 23a-d (Scheme 4). As with 29
commercially available alcohol 21 with carboxylic acid
derivatives 22a-c (X ) OH, Cl). As with the allylic ester
17 (cf. Scheme 1), 23b and 23c gave high yields of alkene
acids 25 and 26 using the Ireland protocol. However, ester
23a presented a special case, since competitive deprotonation
occurred at the R-position of the carbomethoxy group. As a
result we obtained only trace amounts of the desired alkene
24 under standard conditions. Interestingly, however, similar
substrates undergo clean rearrangement utilizing 2.2 equiv
of LiHMDS/TBSCl.11
Scheme 4
We next studied the reactivity of allylic esters 29, 31, and
32 with Lewis acids (Scheme 3). Ester 29 was prepared in
93% yield by condensation of acid chloride 22a with allylic
alcohol 28, itself derived by bromination of alkene 21.12 In
analogous fashion, esters 31 and 32 were obtained by DCC-
mediated coupling of 28 with the appropriate carboxylic acids
22e,f. Allylic ester 29 was then reacted with the Corey
reagent 15 in an attempt to effect 3,3-sigmatropic rearrange-
ment. Using the literature conditions, we obtained only trace
amounts of the desired product S-30 after several days at
temperatures from -20 to 0 °C.7 Similarly, we observed no
reaction employing the Oh reagent (-)-Ipc2BCl13 or with
achiral reagents such as Bu2BOTf.
above (cf. Scheme 3), allylic esters 23a,b failed to undergo
3,3-sigmatropic rearrangement, presumably due to competing
complexation of 15 with the carbomethoxy or nitrile groups.
In contrast, substrates 23c,d were transformed relatively
smoothly to the corresponding alkene acids S-(-)-26 and
S-(-)-27 with ee ≈ 85%.14 The isolated yields of these
materials depended strongly upon the concentration of 15
and reached a maximum of ∼50% utilizing a 3-fold excess
(10) Geometry of 19 was established by NOE studies, which showed a
strong interaction between the vinyl C-H and the geminal methyl groups
(curved arrow).
(11) Jacobi, P. A.; Tassa, C. Manuscript in preparation.
(12) Ito, M.; Koyama, T.; Ogura, K. Chem. Lett. 1986, 101.
(13) Oh, T.; Wrobel, Z.; Devine, P. N. Synlett. 1992, 81.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 5, 2003
703